Stepwise Labor Induction Following Failure of Prostaglandin Vaginal Insert for Labor Induction

March 23, 2016 updated by: Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

Induction of labor is one of the most common obstetrical medical procedures performed today. Iatrogenic stimulation of uterine contractions prior to the onset of spontaneous labor is undertaken for various maternal and fetal indications and spans 20% of deliveries today.

  1. During the past years there has been an additional rise due to elective inductions
  2. Induction is undertaken when potential risks of prolonging pregnancy outweigh the risks of induced delivery, particularly those associated with post-term pregnancy, rupture of membranes, oligohydramnios and additional fetal and maternal conditions that pose risks to mother and fetus.

In many circumstances of women with an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score of 7 or less) sequential induction with more than one agent is necessary. To date, no trial has compared the optimal subsequent ripening method after the preliminary use of dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2). In this trial investigators aim to compare the obstetrical outcomes of subsequent induction in women admitted for induction of labor with Bishop score <7 or less 24 hours after the insertion of vaginal prostaglandin insert (Propess). Two methods of routine induction of labor will be compared: An additional Propess induction for another 24 hours vs. intravenous oxytocin infusion combined with intra-cervical balloon insertion.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Induction of labor is one of the most common obstetrical medical procedures performed today. Iatrogenic stimulation of uterine contractions prior to the onset of spontaneous labor is undertaken for various maternal and fetal indications and spans 20% of deliveries today

  1. During the past years there has been an additional rise due to elective inductions
  2. Induction is undertaken when potential risks of prolonging pregnancy outweigh the risks of induced delivery, particularly those associated with post-term pregnancy, rupture of membranes, oligohydramnios and additional fetal and maternal conditions that pose risks to mother and fetus.

In many circumstances of women with an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score of 7 or less) sequential induction with more than one agent is necessary. To date, no trial has compared the optimal subsequent ripening method after the preliminary use of dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2). In this trial investigators aim to compare the obstetrical outcomes of subsequent induction in women admitted for induction of labor with Bishop score <7 or less 24 hours after the insertion of vaginal prostaglandin insert (Propess). Two methods of routine induction of labor will be compared: An additional Propess induction for another 24 hours vs. intravenous oxytocin infusion combined with intra-cervical balloon insertion.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

320

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Maternal age of 18 years or greater
  2. Singleton gestation
  3. Bishop score of 7 or less 24 hours after the insertion of Propess
  4. Pregnancies at 36+0/7 weeks of gestation and beyond
  5. Normal fetal heart rate tracings and normal sonogram at admission (ie Vertex, appropriate for gestational age, biophysical score of 8/8, normal amniotic fluid index)
  6. No contraindication for prolongation of pregnancy (e.g. intrauterine infection, placental abruption, etc.)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Situations preventing continuation of induction process in any arm - patient refusal, maternal of fetal conditions necessitating prompt delivery.
  2. Rupture of membranes (ROM) after initial Propess insertion.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Administration of Propess

All women who failed induction of labor using vaginal insert slow release of dinoprostone 10 mg (Propess), defined as bishop score ≤ 7 24 hours after propess insertion will be randomized to one of the following treatment arms:

1.Administration of Propess for additional 24 hours.

  1. History taking and physical examination including cervical length
  2. Eligibility assessment
  3. Explanation regarding the study protocol
  4. Signed informed consent (at VAS<3)
  5. Women agreeing to continued induction of labor 24 hours after insertion of Propess, will be randomized using sealed envelopes to the subsequent method of induction of labor (additional vaginal insert vs. oxytocin infusion with intracervical balloon insertion with 60ml saline). Treatment will be given according to the pre-existing and approved departmental protocol. The protocol for oxytocin infusion is 4 units of Pitocin in 10 cc 0.9% NaCl, infused at a rate of 0.4 ml/hour. Infusion rate will be increased every 20 minutes until 3-4 contractions every 10 minutes are produced.

Follow up on all women will be performed from the time of second agent induction until discharge from hospital postpartum.

Experimental: Intravenous oxytocin infusion + balloon

All women who failed induction of labor using vaginal insert slow release of dinoprostone 10 mg (Propess), defined as bishop score ≤ 7 24 hours after propess insertion will be randomized to one of the following treatment arms:

2. Intravenous oxytocin infusion combined with intracervical balloon administration, inflated with 60cc of saline.

  1. History taking and physical examination including cervical length
  2. Eligibility assessment
  3. Explanation regarding the study protocol
  4. Signed informed consent (at VAS<3)
  5. Women agreeing to continued induction of labor 24 hours after insertion of Propess, will be randomized using sealed envelopes to the subsequent method of induction of labor (additional vaginal insert vs. oxytocin infusion with intracervical balloon insertion with 60ml saline). Treatment will be given according to the pre-existing and approved departmental protocol. The protocol for oxytocin infusion is 4 units of Pitocin in 10 cc 0.9% NaCl, infused at a rate of 0.4 ml/hour. Infusion rate will be increased every 20 minutes until 3-4 contractions every 10 minutes are produced.

Follow up on all women will be performed from the time of second agent induction until discharge from hospital postpartum.

  1. History taking and physical examination including cervical length
  2. Eligibility assessment
  3. Explanation regarding the study protocol
  4. Signed informed consent (at VAS<3)
  5. Women agreeing to continued induction of labor 24 hours after insertion of Propess, will be randomized using sealed envelopes to the subsequent method of induction of labor (additional vaginal insert vs. oxytocin infusion with intracervical balloon insertion with 60ml saline). Treatment will be given according to the pre-existing and approved departmental protocol. The protocol for oxytocin infusion is 4 units of Pitocin in 10 cc 0.9% NaCl, infused at a rate of 0.4 ml/hour. Infusion rate will be increased every 20 minutes until 3-4 contractions every 10 minutes are produced.

Follow up on all women will be performed from the time of second agent induction until discharge from hospital postpartum.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time from second agent induction to delivery
Time Frame: 48 hours
Time from second agent induction to active labor
48 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of failed induction defined as 5 cm dilatation
Time Frame: 48 hours
Defined as 5 cm dilatation with regular contractions
48 hours
Rate of failed induction defined as regular contractions
Time Frame: 48 hours
Rate of failed induction defined as regular contractions (over 3 contractions in 30 min)
48 hours
cesarean sections rate
Time Frame: 48 hours
Number of cesarean sections rate due to tachysystole and non-reassuring fetal heart rate.
48 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 28, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

February 17, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 24, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2016

Last Verified

March 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 686-15- TLV

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Induction of Labor

Clinical Trials on Administration of Propess

3
Subscribe