Artificial Induction of Labour in Full-term Singleton Pregnancy : Comparative Randomized Trial of Two Strategies (BESTWAY)

May 12, 2023 updated by: University Hospital, Montpellier

Artificial Induction of Labour in Full-term Singleton Pregnancy : Comparative Randomized Clinical Trial of Two Strategies (DINO-FIRST Versus BALLON-FIRST)

Labour induction is an obstetrical procedure, which artificially starts the process of cervix dilation, in order to induce labour. Several methods of labour induction exist : mechanical ones (using dilatation balloons) or pharmacological ones (using prostaglandins or oxytocin). This trial aims to compare, in case of non-favourable cervix, the strategy of labour induction using the Propess® method first (Dino-first) versus the strategy beginning with the use of a dilatation balloon (Ballon-first), with respect of the usual practice and the current guidelines.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

450

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Montpellier, France, 34295
        • Montpellier University Hospital
      • Nîmes, France, 30029
        • Nîmes University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women with singleton pregnancy
  • Fetus with cephalic presentation
  • Intact membranes between 37 and 42 weeks of amenorrhea
  • Medical indication for labour induction according to the "Haute Autorité de Santé" (HAS) guidelines
  • Unfavourable cervix (Bishop scoring < 7)
  • Age > 18 years-old
  • Person affiliated to a healthcare system
  • Good understanding of the French language

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous C-section or uterine incision
  • Placenta previa
  • Metrorrhagia of unknown origin
  • Lethal foetal abnormality
  • Hyperreactivity to one of the molecules used for the induction (dinoprostone or oxytocin) or to latex
  • Subject participants to another biomedical research
  • Subject under legal guardianship or curatorship

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Dino-first
Labour will be induced by the use of the vaginal Dinoprostone system (Propess®) first.
Labour will be induced using the vaginal Dinoprostone system (Propess®) as a first strategy
Active Comparator: Balloon-first
Labour will be induced by the use of a cervix dilatation balloon first.
Labour will be induced using a cervix dilatation balloon as a first strategy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of vaginal deliveries
Time Frame: On the day of the delivery
Rate of vaginal deliveries (both spontaneous or instrumentally assisted)
On the day of the delivery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of spontaneous vaginal deliveries
Time Frame: On the day of the delivery
Number of spontaneous vaginal deliveries
On the day of the delivery
Rate of instrumentally assisted vaginal deliveries, including the reason for the assistance
Time Frame: On the day of the delivery
Number of instrumentally assisted vaginal deliveries, including the reason for the assistance
On the day of the delivery
Rate of C-section including the reason for the C-section
Time Frame: On the day of the delivery
Number of C-section including the reason for the C-section. The reasons for the C-section can be : a failure of dilatation at the first stage of the labour (between 0 and 10 cm), an absence of foetal descent at the second stage of labour, a foetal reason or a maternal reason)
On the day of the delivery
Timeframe between the beginning of the induction and the beginning of the labour
Time Frame: On the day of the delivery
Time elapsed between the beginning of the induction and the beginning of the labour
On the day of the delivery
Cumulated rate of spontaneous vaginal deliveries
Time Frame: at 12 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours
Cumulated number of spontaneous vaginal deliveries at 12 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours
at 12 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours
Rate of labour induction failure
Time Frame: On the day of the delivery
Rate of labour induction failure is measure by the number of C-sections carried out due to a latency phase (0-6cm), which lasted more than 24 hours, together with the administration of oxytocin for at least 12 to 18 hours after the membranes artifically broke.
On the day of the delivery
Rate of secondary or tertiary use of Propess, Foley catheter of intra-veinous oxytocin
Time Frame: On the day of the delivery
Number of secondary or tertiary use of Propess, Foley catheter of intra-veinous oxytocin
On the day of the delivery
Rate of peridural anaesthesia during labour
Time Frame: On the day of the delivery
Number of peridural anaesthesia during labour
On the day of the delivery
Rate of uterine hyperstimulation without impact on the foetus
Time Frame: On the day of the delivery
Uterine hyperstimulation is described as a number of contractions of 6 or more within 10 minutes, repeating at least twice). Foetal impact is defined as a slowing of the foetal heart rate.
On the day of the delivery
Rate of uterine hyperstimulation with an impact on the foetus
Time Frame: On the day of the delivery
Uterine hyperstimulation is described as a number of contractions of 6 or more within 10 minutes, repeating at least twice). Foetal impact is defined as a slowing of the foetal heart rate.
On the day of the delivery
Rate of uterine hypertonia
Time Frame: On the day of the delivery
Uterine hypertonia is describes as a frequency of contractions every 2 minutes or less together with a slowing of the foetal heart rate.
On the day of the delivery
Rate of post-partum haemorrhagia
Time Frame: On the day of the delivery
Rate of post-partum haemorrhagia above 500 mL, above 1000 mL, transfusion level and number of packed red blood cells transfused
On the day of the delivery
Rate of uterine rupture
Time Frame: On the day of the delivery
Number of patients with a uterine rupture
On the day of the delivery
Rate of intra-uterine infections
Time Frame: On the day of the delivery
Number of patients with intra-uterine infections (body temperature above 38°C measured twice within 30 minutes, associated to 2 criteria within the followings: foetal tachycardia above 160 beats per minute, pain of the uterus or painful uterus contractions ou spontaneous labour induction, or purulent amniotic fluid.
On the day of the delivery
Rate of post-partum infections
Time Frame: One week after day of the delivery
Number of patients with post-partum infections (body temperature above 38°C with antibiotic treatment, urinary tract infections, bacteriological endometritis)
One week after day of the delivery
Rate of neonatal asphyxia
Time Frame: On the day of the delivery
Number of fetuses with neonatal asphyxia
On the day of the delivery
Rate of hospitalization in Neonatal intensive care unit
Time Frame: Up to four days after the delivery
Number of newborn babies hospitalized in Neonatal intensive care unit
Up to four days after the delivery
Rate of proven bacteriological infections in newborn babies
Time Frame: Up to four days after the delivery
Number of proven bacteriological infections in newborn babies
Up to four days after the delivery
Rate of metrorrhagias while putting in place the dilatation balloon or the vaginal pad (dinoprostone)
Time Frame: On the day of the delivery
Number of women who experienced metrorrhagias while putting in place the dilatation balloon or the vaginal pad (dinoprostone)
On the day of the delivery
Pain level linked to the inflation of the dilatation balloon and requiring the partial deflation of the balloon
Time Frame: On the day of the delivery
Measurement of Pain will be made using an Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The pain level will be linked to the inflation of the dilatation balloon and requiring the partial deflation of the balloon
On the day of the delivery
Pain level recorded at different times of the labour induction
Time Frame: On the day of the delivery
Measurement will be made using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and will be recorded at different times of the dilatation balloon or the dinoprostone vaginal pad set up
On the day of the delivery
Assessment of the patient experience of the labour induction
Time Frame: Up to two weeks after the delivery
Patient experience will be assessed using the W-DEQ (Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire)
Up to two weeks after the delivery
Assessment of each strategy direct main costs
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 3 years
The costs of the treatment and duration of the hospitalization will be measured
through study completion, an average of 3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Florent FUCHS, MD PhD, UH of Montpellier

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 16, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 2, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 23, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 30, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RECHMPL19_0044
  • 7756 (Other Identifier: UH Montpellier)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pregnancy Related

Clinical Trials on Vaginal Dinoprostone system (Propess®)

3
Subscribe