Individualized Radiation Dose Control

February 18, 2016 updated by: ferhat, Van Military Hospital

Individualized Radiation Dose Control: Could Neck Circumference be a New Somatometric Parameter to Adjust Tube Current for Thorax CT?

The adjustment of radiation dose in many CT protocol are based on body mass index(BMI) or weight of the patient.

In the literature, neck circumference (NC) has been reported as a new anthropometric parameter indicating the body mass for the upper body.

NC may be an important landmark in the determination of the low dose protocols for upper body CT examinations such as neck, chest and coronary CT.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Over the last few decades, MDCT(multidetector computed tomography), cardiac imaging, CT perfusion techniques, high-pitch CT, and dual-energy CT have been introduced to clinical practice, increasing the overall amount of radiation applied. There are two types of approaches in accordance with the "as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA)" principle in MDCT. One of them is related to new technology products and different imaging techniques such as dose modulation along the x-, y-, and z-axes (anatomical tube current modulation, ECG-controlled tube current modulation or dynamically adjustable pre-patient collimation of the X-ray beam in the z-axis direction, iterative reconstruction technique. The other strategy is individualized screening-dose protocols based on body size. However the radiologist is facing the challenge of providing diagnostic image quality at the lowest radiation dose.

Body mass index (BMI) is not only the most widely used anthropometric tool for defining overweight and obesity, but it is also the most commonly reported body index for adjusting low dose in MDCT.Despite this popularity of BMI, it is becoming increasingly more clear that BMI is not a good surrogate for regional adiposity. Regional fat deposition, especially in the upper body region, is a better predictor of some obesity related complications than BMI. Accordingly, it has been reported that several anthropometric parameters of the chest might serve as a surrogate instead of BMI for individualized dose settings Neck circumference(NC) is a kind of somatometric parameter like wrist or hip circumference that reflects the upper body size. NC may be an important landmark in the determination of the low dose protocols for upper body CT examinations such as neck, chest and coronary CT. Although investigators have not encountered studies in the literature, this point will be evaluated in our study.The purpose of this study is to evaluate if NC is an appropriate and a novel parameter for adjusting and reduction of the effective chest CT radiation doses in comparison with BMI or not.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • VAN, Turkey
        • Recruiting
        • Erdem
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • erdem cevik
      • Van, Turkey, 65002
        • Completed
        • Ferhat

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • clinical diagnosis of pulmonary diseases
  • participants who can be referred to radiology for diagnostic imaging
  • participants who allowed to be taken somatometric measurements

Exclusion Criteria:

  • participants who did not allow to be taken somatometric measurements
  • participants with incomplete data (such as missing weight or height data)
  • pediatric and pregnant patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: The patients underwent thorax CT
The patients refered to radiology service underwent thorax computed tomography without contrast material for the evaluation of various complaints such as dyspnea, hemoptysis and pulmonary infections.
low dose protocol of thorax ct

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The measurement of neck circumference of the patients undergoing non-enhanced thorax CT
Time Frame: 1 year
Before CT examination, during patient preparation, neck circumference was measured horizontally at the level of the cyricoid cartilage by a non-elastic flexible tape (centimeter, cm)
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The measurement of weight of the patients undergoing non-enhanced thorax CT
Time Frame: 1 year
Before CT examination, during patient preparation, patient weight was measured by a bascule (kilogram, kg)
1 year
The measurement of height of the patients undergoing non-enhanced thorax CT
Time Frame: 1 year
Before CT examination, during patient preparation, patient height was measured with a stadiometer (milimeter, mm)
1 year
Calculating the body mass index (BMI) using the results of each patient measured in outcome 2 and outcome 3.
Time Frame: 1 year
calculation of data with a spesific formula (kg/mm²)
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: serkan arıbal, Aksaz Military Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 31, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

February 24, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 24, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2016

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • VETH123

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Radiation Exposure

Clinical Trials on computed tomography

3
Subscribe