- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02697890
Effect of Mucograft® Seal on Post-extraction Ridge Preservation Using Bone Allograft (Mucograft)
Effect of Mucograft® Seal on Post-extraction Ridge Preservation Using Bone Allograft: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial and Radiographic Evaluation
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
One of the serious consequences of single or multiple tooth extraction is the bone resorption that follows, which may create aesthetic problems and compromise future implant placement. Ridge preservation procedures typically use a combination of a scaffold and a membrane. Scaffolds most commonly used are bone grafts; autogenous, allografts, xenografts, and alloplasts. Among these bone grafts, allograft materials such as Demineralized Freeze Dried Bone Allograft (DFDBA) and Freeze Dried Bone Allograft (FDBA) are frequently used in site preservation procedures.
An additional alternative is to use a collagen sponge (CS) in the extraction socket to prevent the infiltration of soft tissues to the lower area and to protect and maintain bone graft materials.
Although ridge preservation has several benefits, it also has several risks and limitations, such as membrane exposure and possible infection, loss or fibrous encapsulation of graft particles, longer healing period prior to implant placement, invasive and technique sensitive procedure, additional cost, and possible soft tissue dehiscence in bone grafted sites compared with non-grafted sites. Therefore, any modifications of the technique that will reduce these risks and limitations would be advantageous.
Mucograft® TM has been specifically designed for soft-tissue regeneration. Its bi-layer structure supports tissue in-growth and regeneration and promotes cellular and extracellular integration within the host tissue. Clinically, this new collagen membrane was associated with a sufficient width of newly formed attached gingiva with coverage of Miller class-I and class-II recession defects. These results suggest that the use of Mucograft® TM in periodontal plastic surgery may provide a viable source of grafting material as an alternative to autogenous and non-autogenous soft tissue graft materials.
This study is a clinical and radiographic, randomized parallel arm comparative evaluation of the addition of Mucograft® seal to FDBA in the ridge preservation procedure. Group A will receive FDBA and a CS. Group B will receive FDBA with Mucograft® seal.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Be at least 18 years of age.
- Have unsalvageable non-adjacent non-molar teeth scheduled for extraction: maxillary incisors, canines, and premolars, and mandibular canines and premolars that require an extraction with ridge preservation planned for delayed implant placement. If a subject has multiple teeth to be extracted, only one tooth will be included in the study.
- Presence of buccal plate at the extraction site as determined by first sectional CBCT scan.
- Patients who are currently treatment planned in the Tufts University School of Dental Medicine (TUSDM) periodontology clinic to receive ridge preservation and meet all medical and dental requirements of the TUSDM periodontology clinic for periodontal surgery (e.g., subjects with no diseases or medication allergies contraindicating periodontal surgery).
- Display no evidence of acute periodontal infection: e.g., abscess, suppuration, severe swelling and/or spontaneous bleeding.
- Non-smoker or smoke less than 10 cigarettes per day.
- Not participating in any other research study for the duration of this study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Have any known disease that interferes with periodontal surgery and would not allow the patient to be treatment planned for the procedures in the TUSDM periodontology clinic (e.g., severe anemia, low white blood cell count, bleeding or coagulation disorder, uncontrolled hypertension (150/90), recent myocardial infarction (within 6 months of enrollment), diabetes (HbA1C ≥7%), HIV/AIDS (self-reported), history of or currently undergoing head and neck radiation, history of or currently taking bisphosphonates, endocrine-induced bone diseases (e.g. hyperparathyroidism), immunosuppressive therapy).
- Have limited mental capacity and unable to give informed consent.
- Be a pregnant or lactating female (self-reported) (following TUSDM periodontology clinic guidelines elective surgical procedures and radiographs/CBCT scans are usually postponed until after delivery).
- Any known allergy/hypersensitivity to FDBA (contains trace amount of gentamicin, providone-iodine), CS or Mucograft® seal.
- Any known allergy to yeast.
- Have untreated acute infection at surgical site.
- Have untreated malignant neoplasm.
- Individuals opposed to having porcine derived materials placed in their mouth due to any personal reasons such as religious reasons.
- Teeth requiring flap reflection for extraction, e.g. deep subgingival caries or fractures.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: FDBA (MinerOss®) + Collagen Sponge (HeliPLUG®)
Interventions: Procedure: Ridge preservation procedure |
Standard of Care
|
Experimental: FDBA (MinerOss®) + Mucograft® seal
Interventions: Device: Mucograft® seal Procedure: Ridge preservation procedure |
Collagen matrix membrane for soft-tissue regeneration
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Changes in Alveolar Bone (mm)
Time Frame: 4 months after surgical procedure
|
Width of Alveolar Bone at 4, 7, and 10mm heights apical to the CEJ buccally and lingually.
Mean of overall buccal and lingual/palatal height (reference hole to buccal and lingual bone top).Assessed clinically by caliper/periodontal probe and radiographically by CBCT scans
|
4 months after surgical procedure
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Changes in Hard Tissues
Time Frame: 4 months after surgical procedure
|
Clinical measurements will be recorded using the prefabricated stent and its horizontal and vertical reference holes along with a caliper.
|
4 months after surgical procedure
|
Changes in Soft Tissues
Time Frame: 4 months after surgical procedure
|
Clinical measurements will be recorded using the prefabricated stent and its horizontal and vertical reference holes along with a caliper.
|
4 months after surgical procedure
|
Keratinized Tissue Width (mm)
Time Frame: 4 months after surgical procedure
|
Assessed clinically by caliper/periodontal probe and radiographically by CBCT scans.
|
4 months after surgical procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Natalie Jeong, DMD, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 11360
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Tooth Extraction Status Nos
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisDENTOSCompleted
-
The European Research Group on Periodontology (ERGOPerio)The University of Hong KongCompletedTooth Extraction Status Nos
-
Necmettin Erbakan UniversityCompleted
-
TC Erciyes UniversityCompletedTooth Extraction Status NosTurkey
-
Plovdiv Medical UniversityCompletedTooth Extraction Status NosBulgaria
-
Gustavo Avila-Ortiz DDS, MS, PhDCompleted
-
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz UniversityActive, not recruitingBone Augmentation | Tooth Extraction Status NosSaudi Arabia
-
Universidade Federal FluminenseCompletedTooth Extraction Status NosBrazil
-
Kafrelsheikh UniversityCompletedDental Implant Failed | Implant Site Reaction | Tooth Extraction Status NosEgypt
-
Gustavo Avila-Ortiz DDS, MS, PhDWithdrawnTooth Extraction Status NosUnited States
Clinical Trials on FDBA (MinerOss®) + Collagen Sponge (HeliPLUG®)
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillGeistlich Pharma AGCompletedTooth ExtractionUnited States
-
Tufts UniversityCompletedLoss of Teeth Due to ExtractionUnited States
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillSunstar AmericasTerminatedBone RegenerationUnited States
-
Harvard School of Dental MedicineBioHorizons, Inc.; Camlog Oral Reconstruction FoundationNot yet recruitingSocket Preservation
-
Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical...Not yet recruiting
-
University of TennesseeCompleted
-
University of ZurichUnknownEsophageal Cancer | Surgery--Complications | Leak, AnastomoticSwitzerland
-
Aesculap AGUniversitätsklinikum KielCompletedLeakage After Esophagectomy | Leakage After Gastrectomy | Perforation of the EsophagusGermany
-
University of WashingtonSynovis Surgical InnovationsCompletedHiatal HerniaUnited States