Comparison Between D&C and Hysteroscopy in Management of AUB in Perimenopausal Women

October 25, 2018 updated by: Mohamed Sayed Abdelhafez

Comparison Between Dilatation and Curettage and Hysteroscopy in Management of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in Perimenopausal Women

The aim of this study is to compare dilatation and curettage with hysteroscopy in obtaining an accurate diagnosis of the etiology of abnormal uterine bleeding and outlining a mode of treatment-specific to the cause.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Perimenopausal women complaining of abnormal uterine bleeding will be selected for assessment through detailed history taking, general and abdominal examination, local gynecological examination, transvaginal sonography (TVS) scanning and routine blood investigations. Eligible participants in our study will be those who complain of menorrhagia, metrorrhagia, polymenorrhoea or polymenorrhagia without local gynecological cause with failure of medical treatment for at least 3 months. All women participating in the study will be randomly allocated into two groups; dilatation and curettage (D&C) group and hysteroscopy group. For women in the D&C group, cervical dilatation and fractional endometrial curettage will be done under total intravenous (IV) anesthesia in operation theater and the curetting will be sent for histopathological examination. For women in the hysteroscopy group, hysteroscopy will be done under total IV anesthesia in operation theater hysteroscopic-guided curettings will also be taken and sent for histopathological examination.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Dakahlia
      • Mansourah, Dakahlia, Egypt, 35111
        • Obstetrics and Gynecology Department in Mansoura University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 55 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Perimenopausal women complaining of abnormal uterine bleeding (menorrhagia, metrorrhagia, polymenorrhoea or polymenorrhagia) without local gynecological cause.
  • Failure of medical treatment for at least 3 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 45 or > 55 years.
  • Blood disorders or coagulopathy.
  • Diagnosed or suspected local gynecologic lesion (polyp, adenomyosis, myoma, malignancy or cervical pathology).
  • Use intrauterine contraceptive device.
  • Pregnancy related conditions.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: D&C group
Women will undergo D&C
Cervical dilatation and fractional endometrial curettage will be done in operation theatre and the curetting will be sent for histopathological examination
Other Names:
  • Dilatation and curettage
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Hysteroscopy group
Women will undergo hysteroscopy
Hysteroscopy will be done in operation theatre and hysteroscopic-guided curettings will also be taken and sent for histopathological examination

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of abnormal endometrial patterns
Time Frame: One week after the procedure
Number of patients diagnosed to have abnormal endometrial patterns after histopathological examination of the curretings per total number of patients underwent the procedure
One week after the procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement rate
Time Frame: 3 months after the procedure
Number of patients improved after performing the procedure and recieving the treatment-specific to cause per total number of patients underwent the procedure
3 months after the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sara M Madany, Mansoura University
  • Study Director: Moustafa H Nawwar, Dr, Mansoura University
  • Study Chair: Mohamed A Elnegeri, Prof, Mansoura University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 10, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 29, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Uterine Bleeding

Clinical Trials on D&C

3
Subscribe