A Efficacy and Safety Study of Nasal Prongs With Proprietary Surface Coating Aiming to Reduce Bacterial Colonization

December 8, 2016 updated by: CytaCoat AB

A Double-blinded Randomized Clinical Pilot Trial of Nasal Prongs With Proprietary Surface Coating Aiming to Reduce Bacterial Colonization

The study is a first step in establishing the safety and efficacy of the CytaCoat technology when applied to a medical device such as a nasal prong and the clinical data generated will serve as a basis for continuous studies in clinically significant settings such as the neonatal care units.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

48

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Stockholm County
      • Stockholm, Stockholm County, Sweden, 171 76
        • Neonatal, Karolinska University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Legally competent, has been informed of the nature, the scope and the relevance of the study, voluntarily agrees to participation and the study's provisions, and has duly signed the informed consent form (ICF).
  2. Subject is between 18 and 65 years of age.
  3. Subjects that have intact, wound free and scar free skin at the Nasal Prong target site.
  4. Subject that have intact, irritation-free nasal mucus membrane.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant or nursing women.
  2. Subjects who are active smokers or using snuff.
  3. Subjects currently suffering from a common cold, sinusitis, allergies or sleep apnea.
  4. Subjects suffering from and/or subjects that have experienced nosebleed within 1 month prior to entering the study.
  5. Subjects using and/or subjects that have used oral or topical antibiotics within 2 weeks prior to entering the study.
  6. Subjects using and/or subjects that have used oral or topical anti-inflammatory drugs within 1 week prior to entering the study.
  7. Subjects participating in any other clinical study.
  8. Subjects diagnosed with any type of skin infection (bacterial, viral or fungal) or inflammatory skin disease including psoriasis, eczema or severe acne
  9. Subjects diagnosed with any type disease affecting mucus membranes.
  10. Subjects suffering from any other condition or symptoms preventing the subject from entering the study, according to the investigator´s judgment.
  11. Subjects who have a lesion (including lymphadenopathy), dysaesthesia, previous surgery or abnormal anatomy at the Nasal Prong target site
  12. Any subject that according to the Declaration of Helsinki is deemed unsuitable for study enrolment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CytaCoat Nasal Prong
The CytaCoat Nasal Prong is composed of the reference device coated with CytaCoat technology.
Active Comparator: Reference Nasal Prong
Inspiration Healthcare Inspire nCPAP Nasal Prong consists of silicone. Is a Conformité Européenne marked (CE-marked) commercially available medical device.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mean Difference in Bacterial Colonization of the Nasal Prong After 18 Hours of Device Usage When Comparing the CytaCoat Nasal Prong to the Reference Device.
Time Frame: 18 hours
18 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Any Adverse Events Such as Skin Reactions, Allergic Reactions, Abrasions, Shears or Wounds Due to Contact or Pressure of the Device on the Nose of Subjects Occurring During the Study.
Time Frame: 18 hours
18 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Baldvin Jonsson, Neonatal, Karolinska University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 26, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

April 29, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 1, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2016

Last Verified

December 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated

Clinical Trials on CytaCoat Nasal Prong

3
Subscribe