Preventing Intimate-partner Violence: Impact Evaluation of Engaging Men Through Accountable Practice in Eastern DRC

May 16, 2018 updated by: World Bank
The objective of the study is to evaluate the impact of Engaging Men in Accountable Practice (EMAP) on the prevention of violence against women and girls in North and South Kivu (DRC). The study is conducted jointly by the World Bank's Africa Gender Innovation Lab and the International Rescue Committee (IRC). EMAP is a program developed and implemented by the IRC to engage men to reflect on how to reduce and prevent intimate partner violence through 16 weekly group discussion sessions. The study is a cluster randomized control trial in which two groups of 25 self-selected men in 15 communities receive the EMAP intervention while in 15 other communities, 50 self-selected men receive an alternative intervention. Key outcomes examined include: (i) Experience of past year physical, sexual and psychological violence reported by women whose partners are EMAP participants; (ii) Participant's gender attitudes and behaviors, conflict and hostility management skills; (iii) Power sharing and communication within the couple.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1387

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bukavu, Congo, The Democratic Republic of the
        • International Rescue Committee
      • Goma, Congo, The Democratic Republic of the
        • International Rescue Committee

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 20 or older but preferably at least 25;
  • Resident of their village, having lived in the community for a minimum of six months with plans to continue living there for at least the coming six months;
  • Ability to participate actively in group work and reflection activities;
  • Commitment to attend meetings, sessions and other activities regularly without incentives;
  • Commitment to non-violence toward women and girls for the duration of the EMAP intervention;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Involved in the IRC-led adolescent girl intervention (COMPASS).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: EMAP Treatment
Engaging Men through Accountable Practice: 30 communities are matched into 15 pairs on a set of socio-demographic characteristic and within each pair, 15 treatment sites are randomly selected. Within each treatment community, all adult men (20+ years old) are eligible to participate in the EMAP intervention. A random draw of 50 participants determines who will participate in EMAP in case more than 50 eligible men express interest.
Engaging Men through Accountable Practice aims to engage men as agents of change through structured, weekly discussions with committed groups of men. It aims to address entrenched views of gender roles and identify positive models of masculinity. The approach follows a structured series of discussions designed to explore existing understandings of masculinity and create more positive models of what it means to be a 'good' man, promoting self-reflection and pushing men to analyze and change their own power and privilege. This methodology begins with a series of discussions with women to inform men's dialogue groups, and includes continuous feedback loops with women throughout the process so that the work with men is grounded in, and accountable to, women's views and objectives.
Other: Control
In the 15 control sites, the male participants will receive an alternative intervention focused on a non-gender topic of 16 weekly sessions for men only.
Control communities will receive an alternative intervention focused on a non-gender topic of 16 weekly sessions for men only.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in baseline prevalence of intimate-partner violence
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months follow-up
Change in the % of women who self-report experience of violence by their male partner. The women interviewed are the partners of the male study participants.
Baseline, 12 months follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in acceptability of intimate partner violence
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months follow-up
Change in the % of women (partners of participants) and men (participants) who report that violence is acceptable in at least one of the situations listed in the survey.
Baseline, 12 months follow-up
Change in intention to commit violence
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months follow-up
Change in the % of male participants who report that they are likely to become violent in a list of situations. Scale used: Proximal Antecedents to Violent Episodes.
Baseline, 12 months follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Julia Vaillant, PhD, World Bank

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 4, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

May 6, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 21, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P149394

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

The World Bank has an open data policy, and the de-identified, anonymized data will be published online after the study is completed.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Domestic Violence

Clinical Trials on Engaging Men through Accountable Practice

3
Subscribe