Comparative Evaluation of Post Endodontic Pain Following Root Canal Treatment With Two Rotary System: Neolix & Waveone

Today, dentists tend to use rotary systems. Despite the increasing diversity of these systems as well as a few studies on the prevalence of pain after root canal treatment by rotary systems, And in particular, comparing the amount of pain after treatment, between systems RECIPROCAL AND FULL ROTATION single-file, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of applying canal preparation by the system, Neolix and WaveOne, on the prevalence of pain after endodontic treatments.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Many studies of pain after root canal treatment experience were taken into consideration.

Pain after endodontic treatment is still one of the major problems of patients. The prevalence that widely studied as 6/10% to 9.82% have been reported.

One of the important strategies in endodontic treatment, prevention and control of pain after treatment. This multi-factorial disorder resulting in a complex process occurs, which affects the patient's intrinsic factors, the tooth and the dentist's skill.

Mechanical factors include channel instrumentation techniques, over instrumentation or filling material extrusion channels associated with the presence of pain after treatment were considered.

Apical extrusion of infected debris during instrumentation channel can create or exacerbate inflammatory process. Channel shaping the apical debris extrusion process can increase even if the preparation is limited to the channel. Leaving debris in both methods of preparation, either manually with stainless steel files and rotary technique with nickel titanium files happen.

The use of rotary technique among dentists has increased. developing of NITI files and rotary instrumentation system, reduce apical extrusion of debris, so can be expected to reduce the incidence of inflammation and pain after treatment, achieved by these means.

Recent studies have shown that reciprocal shaping techniques, compared with full-rotation techniques, significantly increased the amount of debris extruded from the apical region of the root are causing increasing pain after treatment.

Two rotary system available on the market are:

1) Neolix (france Neolix SAS) recently introduced the file NITI, single file, with full rotation movements, with square and rectangular cross-section, with a non-uniform shape along the blade, tip sizes, 25 and Tipper 0 / 08, and a system, Wave one, (DENTSPLY Maillefer), which is a file NITI, Single file and Single use, and the reciprocation movements, and cross-Convex triangular Modified and in three sizes: small, primary (tip size 25 and Tipper 0/08), large is contained, which according to the size of the canal, one of them is selected.

In a study by Ana Arias et al., Patients in the experimental group by the Rotary Files roots were treated and patients in control group were treated by the step-back technique, the results showed that more patients in the control group, experienced pain after root canal therapy. While the duration of the pain in the control group comparison to the experimental group, less has been reported.

In a study by Aqrabawi, teeth with vital pulp were divided into two groups. Root canal therapy in the first group, was done by manual file, and the second group, by Protaper rotary files were performed.

And no significant difference in pain after root canal treatment has not been detected.

Gambarini was shown in the study, patients treated by waveone system they have done, significantly more pain after treatment compared to TF and TF adaptive experienced.

Today, dentists tend to use rotary systems. Despite the increasing diversity of these systems as well as a few studies on the prevalence of pain after root canal treatment by rotary systems, And in particular, comparing the amount of pain after treatment, between systems RECIPROCAL AND FULL ROTATION single-file, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of applying canal preparation by the system, Neolix and WaveOne, on the prevalence of pain after endodontic treatments.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age range 20-50 years,
  • the systemically healthy,
  • first or second molar teeth require root canal therapy,
  • irreversible Pulpitis signed without the apical,
  • root canal curvature of less than 25 degrees, according to Schneider techniques.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Root canal treatment,
  • history of medication (antibiotics, NSAID, opiates) of the patient 12 hours before treatment,
  • pregnancy,
  • complex anatomy,
  • channels blocked in the x-ray plate,
  • internal and external resorption,
  • open apex teeth,
  • periodontal disease,
  • inflammation and abscesses,
  • sinus tract,
  • presence of radiographic lesions,
  • tooth sensitivity to percussion,
  • absence of occlusal contact.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: neolix rotary system (continuous rotation system)
Procedure: neolix rotary system post-treatment pain after using neolix rotary system
Procedure: neolix rotary system
Experimental: waveone rotary system (reciprocating system)
Procedure: waveone rotary system post-treatment pain after using waveone rotary system
Procedure: waveone rotary system
Experimental: hand files k-files
Procedure: hand files post-treatment pain after using hand files
Procedure: hand files k-files

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Information regarding post-operation pain is gathered via a patient using questionnaire and is measured via the visual analogue scale
Time Frame: 12 month
12 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 9, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

May 11, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 11, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2016

Last Verified

April 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Postoperative Pain Pathologic Processes Postoperative Complications Signs and Symptoms

Clinical Trials on neolix rotary system (continuous rotation system)

3
Subscribe