Parkinsonian Brain Repair Using Human Stem Cells (HSCfPD)

June 9, 2016 updated by: Celavie Bioscences, LLC

Human OK99 Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients With Severe Parkinson's Disease

Implantation of Celavie human stem cells (OK99) is intended to address the underlying pathology of the disease by replacing damaged/destroyed cells of the brain, and/or stimulating the patient's brain to repair itself.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This trial is a longitudinal, prospective, interventional, uncontrolled study designed to test, firstly, the safety and secondly, the potential efficacy of intraputaminal grafting of undifferentiated hfSC for the treatment of PD. Patients were monitored carefully for any adverse effects. All patients underwent baseline and 6- and 12-month post-surgery neurological, neuropsychological, MRI, and PET evaluations.

Procurement, isolation, expansion, and characterization of hfSC, as well as assessment of patients' immune response to hfSC grafting, were performed at Celavie Biosciences, LLC (Oxnard, CA USA). Patient selection, pre- and post-surgery neurological, neuropsychological, and MRI evaluations, as well as stereotactic surgery and post-surgery care, were performed at Hospital Angeles del Pedregal (Mexico City, Mexico). Synthesis of radiopharmaceuticals and PET imaging were carried out at the Radiopharmacy-Cyclotron Unit of the Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (Mexico City, Mexico). Eight patients with moderate to advanced PD were selected for this trial. One of the patients was lost to follow up due to reasons unrelated to this study. Subjects that completed follow up were 2 females and 5 males, with ages ranging between 43-74 years (mean age 56 years).

Procurement and expansion of hfSC

Human fetal brain tissue was procured via routine sterile manual aspiration methods with informed consent from the donor in accordance with NIH guidelines for use of fetal tissue as well as federal, and state laws. Tissue donor and hfSC recipients remained unknown to each other.

Maternal blood samples (sera) were tested for: HIV (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park IL, USA) hepatitis A, B and C (Abbott); HTLVI (Abbott); VDRL (Baxter Agglutination Slide Test and reflex FTA), and cytomegalovirus (Quest, Oxnard CA). Women with a history of genital herpes, cancer, asthma, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, allergies, vasculitis of autoimmune origin, and drug abuse were excluded. Gestation was determined according to Carnegie stages. Fetal tissue was harvested at the sixth week of gestation after elective abortion. Fetal brain was dissected, minced and triturated to a single cell suspension. Cells were cultured in flasks incubated at 37°C under hypoxic conditions (5% O2 and 5% CO2) through 4 doublings. At the second doubling (D2) cell culture was tested for sterility (USP <71>) and at D4 culture was karyotyped and PCR tested for presence of adventitious agents: HTLV-1, HTLV-2, HIV-1 (A, B, D, F, H, N), hepatitis A, B and C, T. p. pallidum, CMV, HSV-1, HSV-2, HPV. Cells were then transferred to a closed bioreactor system (GE WAVE Bioreactor 2/10 System, Uppsala SWE), operating under the same physical and chemical conditions. The bioreactor was used to create the Master Cell Bank (MCB), which was harvested, tested, characterized and rate-control cryopreserved after a total of seven doublings (D7).

After the MCB was safety tested and characterized, a portion of the batch was thawed and used to seed the bioreactor for the Working Cell Bank (WCB) production. Cells were cultured in the bioreactor until they reached D13. They were harvested (Centritech LAB-III, Carr Centritech Separation System, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, USA), aliquoted (Fill-It; TAP Biosystems, Wilmington, DE, USA), and cryopreserved to create a WCB. The WCB was subjected to release testing for safety and characterization assays. Safety testing included sterility (USP <71>), mycoplasma (USP <63), endotoxin (USP <85>), and karyotyping (Cell Line Genetics, Madison WI, USA). Characterization included flow cytometry testing for: Oct-4 >90% (10H11.2, EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA; AF488 conjugated), Sox-2 >90% (Btjce, eBioscience, San Diego CA, USA; AF488 conjugated), MHC-I <10% (A4, eBioscience; APC conjugated), MHC-II <10% (CVS20, Novus Biologicals, Littleton CO, USA; AF488 conjugated), CD105 <10% (SN6, eBioscience; PE-Cy7 conjugated), and tyrosine hydroxylase <10% (EP1532Y, Abcam, Cambridge, UK; FITC conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG; Abcam; polyclonal). Both MCB and WCB were stored in gas phase LN2 at -196°C.

All procedures were performed under aseptic conditions in an ISO 8 clean room, utilizing ISO 5 bio-safety cabinets and laminar airflow hoods, according to validated protocols. Cells were shown to have a normal karyotype and did not produce teratomas in immunocompromised rodents (unpublished data).

Pharmacotherapy

Immunosuppression via cyclosporine A at a dose of 15 mg/kg/day was started 10 days prior to surgery and continued for one month thereafter. Patients also received Indomethacin 225mg/day, starting at 10 days prior to implantation and for six months postoperatively thereafter. Wide spectrum antibiotic (Zannat 700mg) was given preoperatively and 48 hours post-operatively. Antiparkinsonian medications were adjusted to patient's requirements.

Stereotactic surgery

MRI-guided stereotactic intraputaminal cell implantation into PD patients was performed using a Leksell Stereotactic System and Stealth Station Surgical Navigation System (Fridley, Minnesota, USA). Ropivacaine was used as a local anesthetic for frame placement. For target locations, measurements were made using CT-scan images fused with previous MR images (both in DICOM format, in axial sections 1.0 mm thick). With the patient under general anesthesia, the stereotactic frame was fixed to the operating table with a Mayfield head holder. Bilateral parasagittal incisions and corresponding 14 mm burr holes (one for each hemisphere) were made in preparation for cell suspension injections. Two different needle tracks through the same burr hole were selected for each side. Target locations were determined by height and length of putaminal nuclei. The lowest Z-coordinates of each track were located in the dorsal putamen and spaced 4mm apart in the X-direction. Each needle track received 1X106 cells in 1 cc of culture medium. To ensure complete cell suspension delivery, injections were carried out slowly for 2 min with reciprocal withdrawal of the delivery needle to avoid both damage to stem cells and brain tissue, as well as to avert reflux or bubble formation. After surgery, patients were kept in a conventional post-operative care unit for 1 h. The day following surgery, MR images were obtained to confirm correct placement of cell suspensions. All patients were discharged 24 h after surgery.

Neurological evaluations

Neurological endpoints of this study included evaluation of the number and severity of adverse events after cell grafting, and the efficacy in the improvement of motor responses, as assessed on the UPDRS part I (mentation, behavior and mood), part II (motor activities of the daily living), part III (motor performance), and part IV (complications of therapy), as well as the modified Höehn and Yahr Scale, and the modified Schwab and England Activities of the Daily Living Scale. Patients were clinically evaluated with these scales at screening (as baseline, before surgery), and then after the procedure at six and 12 months. At every visit, patients were asked to discontinue antiparkinsonian medications at least 12 hours before the UPDRS assessment (for practical purposes, "OFF" state was defined as overnight drug withdrawal) in order to be rated in their "OFF" state and then, UPDRS "ON" medication evaluations were performed 1 hour after receiving their usual dose of levodopa. Each patient received the same preoperative levodopa dose for each assessment. Adverse events, including those reported by the patients spontaneously and those observed during the evaluations were recorded. After obtaining signed informed consent from all patients that completed the study, all "OFF" and "ON" UPDRS evaluations, were videotaped.

Neuropsychological evaluations

Cognitive performance was evaluated using the following instruments: Mexican adaptations of Beck and Steer's anxiety [25] and depression [26] inventories; our brief neuropsychological (NEUROPSI)[27,28] and computerized neuropsychological test batteries, and the Mini-mental Parkinson State Examination (MMPSE)[29]. Patients reported on their quality of life as related to their daily living activities; physical and mental well-being (health status); cognition and communication, and one summary index.

Immunogenicity testing

Patient's blood was evaluated for increase in titers of hfSC specific antibodies and for increase in antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity after implantation as compared to baseline values. Samples were drawn one month prior to cell implantation, and then one month and six months after surgery. Whole blood specimens were collected from each patient and processed as serum one and six months post-grafting using the lipophilic membrane dye PKH67 (Sigma-Aldrich) as described by the manufacturer for cell tracking in immune response and cytotoxicity assays by flow cytometry [30,31]. Cytotoxicity assay was performed with 100:1, 50:1, and 25:1 effector to target ratios.

MRI

MR images were obtained before surgery (baseline) and three times after cell implantation at 24 h, and six and 12 months post-surgery. They were acquired with a 3 Tesla magnet, MR Systems Achieva release 2.6.3.8 Philips (Best, The Netherlands).

PET molecular imaging

Patients underwent PET molecular imaging at baseline, at six months (data not presented), and at one year after hfSC implantation. Radiopharmaceuticals utilized were (+)-alpha-[11C]Dihidrotetrabenazine (DTBZ), 6-[18F]Fluoro-L-DOPA (FDOPA), and [11C]Raclopride (RAC). All patients underwent DTBZ-PET scans and one additional study with either FDOPA or RAC, at least one week apart. Patients were asked to discontinue antiparkinsonian medications at least 12h before each study. Scans were acquired on a Siemens Biograph 64 PET/CT. Thirty-minute brain emission scans were acquired 20 minutes post-injection of DTBZ or RAC, while 15 min scans were acquired for FDOPA 75 min post-injection. All patients studied with FDOPA were pre-medicated with 150 mg of carbidopa to prevent peripheral decarboxylation. Images were reconstructed using an OSEM-2D algorithm and analyzed with the software Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM v.12). Each individual PET brain image was normalized on an anatomical MRI atlas to be evaluated within a standard space. Following normalization, FSL structural atlases were used for definition of the regions of interest. To facilitate the quantitative analysis, specific uptake ratios (SUR) in the caudate and putamen were calculated by subtracting the background signal of a reference region with nonspecific uptake from striatal activity and dividing by reference region activity [(target uptake - reference uptake)/reference uptake], using occipital cortex (DTBZ and FDOPA) and cerebellum (RAC), as reference regions.

Statistical analysis

Comparisons between baseline and 12-month follow-up measurements for anxiety, depression, NEUROPSI, MMPSE examinations, right and left finger tapping in "ON" and "OFF" medication states were performed using the Wilcoxon test. All other end measures were reported as individual results for each patient.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

8

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Mexico City, Mexico
        • Hospital Angeles Del Pedregal

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of idiopathic PD with tremor, rigidity or hypokinesia as major symptoms.
  • A two to twenty-five-year history of PD with significant medical management or difficulty in medical management.
  • A definite response to levodopa compounds with inadequately relieved of symptoms, or severe secondary effects of the drug.
  • Good general health.
  • A strong will or desire to have the procedure after being fully informed of its experimental nature.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of repeated strokes with stepwise progression of parkinsonian features
  • History of repeated head injury
  • History of definite encephalitis
  • Oculogyric crises (unless drug-induced)
  • Neuroleptic treatment at onset of symptoms
  • Supranuclear gaze palsy
  • Cerebellar signs
  • Babinski sign
  • Presence of cerebral tumor or communicating hydrocephalus on CT scan
  • Sustained remission or negative response to an adequate dose of levodopa
  • Patients with parkinsonism other than Idiopathic PD

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Single Arm Study
stereotactic brain surgery of human stem cells (OK99)

MRI-guided stereotactic intraputaminal cell implantation into PD patients was performed.

For target locations, measurements were made using CT-scan images fused with previous MR images. Bilateral parasagittal incisions and corresponding 14 mm burr holes were made in preparation for cell suspension injections.

To ensure complete cell suspension delivery, injections were carried out slowly for 2 min with reciprocal withdrawal of the delivery needle to avoid both damage to stem cells and brain tissue, as well as to avert reflux or bubble formation.

After surgery, patients were kept in a conventional post-operative care unit for 1 h. The day following surgery, MR images were obtained to confirm correct placement of cell suspensions. All patients were discharged 24 h after surgery.

Other Names:
  • OK99

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Safety as Measured by the Number and Severity of Adverse Events
Time Frame: three years
three years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
FDOPA (L-3,4-dihydroxy-6-(18)F-fluorophenylalanine) uptake
Time Frame: three years
Positron Emission Tomography
three years
Raclopride uptake
Time Frame: three years
Positron Emission Tomography
three years
DTBZ ([18F]9-fluoropropyl-(+)-dihydrotetrabenazine) uptake
Time Frame: three years
Positron Emission Tomography
three years
Barona Demographic Equation
Time Frame: three years
Premorbid Estimates
three years
North American Adult Reading Test (NAART)
Time Frame: three years
Premorbid Estimates
three years
Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR)
Time Frame: three years
Premorbid Estimates
three years
Wide Range AchievementTest (WRAT)
Time Frame: three years
Premorbid Estimates
three years
Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (DRS)
Time Frame: three years
Neuropsychological Screening
three years
Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS)
Time Frame: three years
Neuropsychological Screening
three years
Intelligence Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (KBIT)
Time Frame: three years
Neuropsychological Screening
three years
Raven's Progressive Matrices
Time Frame: three years
Neuropsychological Screening
three years
Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI)
Time Frame: three years
Neuropsychological Screening
three years
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS)
Time Frame: three years
Neuropsychological Screening
three years
Auditory Consonant Trigrams (ACT)
Time Frame: three years
Attention and Working Memory
three years
Brief Test of Attention (BTA)
Time Frame: three years
Attention and Working Memory
three years
Continuous Performance Tests (CPT)
Time Frame: three years
Attention and Working Memory
three years
Digit and Visual Spans
Time Frame: three years
Attention and Working Memory
three years
Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT)
Time Frame: three years
Attention and Working Memory
three years
Stroop Test
Time Frame: three years
Attention and Working Memory
three years
Cognitive Estimation Test (CET)
Time Frame: three years
Executive Function
three years
Delis-Kaplan Executive Function Scale (DKEFS)
Time Frame: three years
Executive Function
three years
Halstead Category Test
Time Frame: three years
Executive Function
three years
Trailmaking Test (TMT)
Time Frame: three years
Executive Function
three years
Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST)
Time Frame: three years
Executive Function
three years
Benton Visual Retention Test (BVRT-R)
Time Frame: three years
three years
California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT)
Time Frame: three years
Memory
three years
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)
Time Frame: three years
Memory
three years
Rey Complex Figure Test (RCFT)
Time Frame: three years
Memory
three years
Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS)
Time Frame: three years
Memory
three years
Boston Naming Test (BNT)
Time Frame: three years
Language
three years
Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT)
Time Frame: three years
Language
three years
Sentence Repetition
Time Frame: three years
Language
three years
Token Test
Time Frame: three years
Language
three years
Complex Ideational Material
Time Frame: three years
Language
three years
Benton Facial Recognition Test
Time Frame: three years
Visuoperception
three years
Benton Judgment of Line Orientation (JLO)
Time Frame: three years
Visuoperception
three years
Hooper Visual Organization Test (VOT)
Time Frame: three years
Visuoperception
three years
Finger Tapping
Time Frame: three years
Motor and Sensory Perception
three years
Grooved Pegboard
Time Frame: three years
Motor and Sensory Perception
three years
Hand Dynamometer
Time Frame: three years
Motor and Sensory Perception
three years
Sensory-Perceptual Examination
Time Frame: three years
Motor and Sensory Perception
three years
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
Time Frame: three years
Mood State and Personality
three years
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Time Frame: three years
Mood State and Personality
three years
Hamilton Depression Scale (HDS)
Time Frame: three years
Mood State and Personality
three years
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)
Time Frame: three years
Mood State and Personality
three years
Profile of Mood States (POMS)
Time Frame: three years
Mood State and Personality
three years
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Time Frame: three years
Mood State and Personality
three years
Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ)
Time Frame: three years
Quality of Life, Coping, and Stressors
three years
Coping Responses Inventory (CRI)
Time Frame: three years
Quality of Life, Coping, and Stressors
three years
Ways of Coping Questionnaire
Time Frame: three years
Quality of Life, Coping, and Stressors
three years
Life Stressors and Social Resources Inventory (LISRES)
Time Frame: three years
Quality of Life, Coping, and Stressors
three years
Efficacy as measured by the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)
Time Frame: three years
three years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Oleg Kopyov, MD, PhD, Celavie Bioscences, LLC
  • Principal Investigator: Ignacio Madrazo, MD, PhD, Hospital Angeles Del Pedregal

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

May 24, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 13, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2016

Last Verified

June 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OK99-2014-2017
  • CMN2012-027 (Other Identifier: COFEPRIS Federal Commission for the Protection against Sanitary Risk (Mexico))

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Idiopathic Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on Human Stem Cells

3
Subscribe