- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02804529
A Comparison of Three Different Entry Points to Establish the Pneumoperitoneum
A Comparison of Three Different Puncture Points to Establish the Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Randomized Prospective Trial
The Palmer's point and periumbilical region are the common laparoscopic entry site to establish the pneumoperitoneum. In the present study, the investigators assess the safety and feasibility of Meng's point as a new laparoscopic entry site in cases to perform the gastrointestinal surgery.
This prospective and randomized study will compare the three entry techniques with regard to:
- Complications related to the entry technique
- Time taken to enter the abdomen.
- The number of attempts taken to enter the abdomen
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Beijing
-
Beijing, Beijing, China, 100029
- Recruiting
- China-Japan Friendship Hospital
-
Contact:
- Fanqiang Meng, MA
- Phone Number: +8684206168
- Email: mengfq75@163.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Any patient suitable for laparoscopic abdominal surgery
Exclusion Criteria:
- previous abdominal surgeries
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Meng's Point entry
Meng's entry involved a 0.2 cm horizontal or vertical incision using the Veress needle in the cross of lateral border of the left rectus abdominis and rib arch.
|
|
|
Experimental: Palmer's Point entry
Palmer's entry involved a 0.2 cm horizontal or vertical incision with the Veress needle in the left midclavicular line approximately 3 cm caudal to the 10th rib
|
|
|
Experimental: Periumbilllicus entry
Periumbilllicus entry involved a 0.2 cm horizontal or vertical midline incision using the Veress needle in the lower or uper border of the umbilicus.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Complications during entry in laparoscopy
Time Frame: During surgery
|
During surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Time to enter in the abdominal cavity
Time Frame: During surgery
|
During surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Fanqiang Meng, MD,CSCRS, China-Japan Friendship Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Granata M, Tsimpanakos I, Moeity F, Magos A. Are we underutilizing Palmer's point entry in gynecologic laparoscopy? Fertil Steril. 2010 Dec;94(7):2716-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.03.055. Epub 2010 May 10.
- Angioli R, Terranova C, De Cicco Nardone C, Cafa EV, Damiani P, Portuesi R, Muzii L, Plotti F, Zullo MA, Panici PB. A comparison of three different entry techniques in gynecological laparoscopic surgery: a randomized prospective trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Dec;171(2):339-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.09.012. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
- Ahmad G, Gent D, Henderson D, O'Flynn H, Phillips K, Watson A. Laparoscopic entry techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 31;8:CD006583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006583.pub4.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ChinaJapanFH Meng001
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.