Non-interventional Follow-up Versus Fluid Bolus in RESPONSE to Oliguria in the Critically Ill (RESPONSE)

December 10, 2020 updated by: Suvi Vaara, Helsinki University Central Hospital

Non-interventional Follow-up Versus Fluid Bolus in RESPONSE to Oliguria in the Optimization Phase of Fluid Therapy in the Critically Ill (the RESPONSE Trial)

Background: After hypotension, oliguria (urine output less than 0.5 mL/kg/h) was the most common trigger to administer fluid bolus in a multinational practice survey in intensive care. The effect of fluid bolus on cardiovascular variables can be very short-lived among patients in shock suggesting that fluid boluses in the optimization phase are unlikely to improve patient-centered outcomes. Moreover, a growing body of evidence suggests a poor renal response to fluid bolus.

Objective: To investigate, whether fluid bolus - as a standard of care - improves urine output in oliguric patients compared to a non-interventional follow-up approach without fluid bolus.

Design: Investigator-initiated, open, randomized, controlled study

Interventions:

  1. Intervention group - follow-up without intervention
  2. Control group - fluid bolus (500mL of balanced crystalloid over 30 minutes)

Randomization: 1:1 stratified according to the site, presence of acute kidney injury, and sepsis

Trial size: 130 patients randomized in 2 ICUs

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Study hypothesis:

The investigators hypothesize that fluid bolus given due to oliguria does not improve urine output in a majority of patients, especially among those with acute kidney injury. Another study hypothesis is that patients receiving fluid bolus will have higher levels of endothelial damage biomarkers.

Intervention description:

Intervention group -follow-up without intervention; No intervention to increase the urine output within 2 hours will be done.

Standard group - Fluid bolus group: Patient will receive 500mL of balanced crystalloid intravenously over 30 minutes.

In both groups, if severe hemodynamic instability occurs, a rescue bolus of 500mL over 30 minutes may be given according to the decision of the treating clinician.

In both groups, all other ongoing infusions (nutrition and on-going clear fluids) will be held constant during the 2-hour period. Vasoactive medications, sedation, short-acting insulin, and other medications can be modified according the clinical need. No diuretics during the 2-hour study period are allowed. After two hours from randomization, treating clinician can modify the fluid and drug therapy according to the clinical needs of the patient. All administered fluids will be recorded 6 h from randomization.

Except for the study intervention period of 2 hours, no attempt to control fluid therapy will be done. During the study period, all other aspects of critical care will follow the ICU's standard operating procedures and clinician's prescription.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

130

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Jyväskylä, Finland
        • Central Finland Central Hospital
    • Uusimaa
      • Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland, 00290
        • Helsinki University Hospital, Meilahti

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age over 18
  • Emergency admission to an ICU
  • Mean arterial pressure (MAP) >65 mmHg (with vasopressors if needed) and initial fluid resuscitation for shock/hypovolemia has been given
  • Oliguria (urine output less than 0.5mL/kg/h) for at least 2 consecutive hours

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Marked fluctuations in hemodynamics within last 2 hours (cardiac arrhythmias, increase in norepinephrine need over 0.2ug/kg/min, need for initiation of inotrope/inodilator)
  • Administration of furosemide within last 6 hours
  • Chronic kidney disease (estimated pre-critical illness GFR < 60ml/min/1.73m2)
  • Renal replacement therapy
  • Among patients with acute kidney injury, urgent indications for commencing renal replacement therapy
  • Fluid overload (cumulative fluid accumulation exceeds 10% of baseline body weight)
  • Pulmonary edema (bilateral infiltrates in chest x-ray)
  • Active bleeding (need for transfusion, platelets, or fresh frozen plasma)
  • Suspected or known intra-abdominal hypertension (IAP >16mmHg)
  • Pregnant or lactating
  • Expected survival less than 24h
  • Obtaining informed consent is not possible/consent is denied

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: follow-up without intervention
No intervention to increase the urine output within 2 hours will be done.
Active Comparator: Standard group - fluid bolus
Patient will receive 500mL of balanced crystalloid intravenously over 30 minutes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in individual mean cumulative urine output (mL/kg/h)
Time Frame: 2 hours after randomization compared to urine output 2 hours preceding randomization
Doubling of the urine output is defined as clinically meaningful response
2 hours after randomization compared to urine output 2 hours preceding randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The difference between groups in the change in individual urine output
Time Frame: 2 hours after randomization compared to urine output 2 hours preceding randomization
2 hours after randomization compared to urine output 2 hours preceding randomization
Duration of consecutive oliguria (urine output <0.5 mL/kg)
Time Frame: during ICU stay, i.e. as long as urine output stays below 0.5 mL/kg/h while the patient is in the ICU (an average of 5 to 7 days) or until renal replacement therapy is commenced
during ICU stay, i.e. as long as urine output stays below 0.5 mL/kg/h while the patient is in the ICU (an average of 5 to 7 days) or until renal replacement therapy is commenced
Cumulative fluid balance
Time Frame: six hours from randomization
six hours from randomization

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of patients receiving rescue boluses and the number of rescue boluses
Time Frame: study intervention period (i.e. 2 hours)
study intervention period (i.e. 2 hours)
Highest stage of acute kidney injury
Time Frame: within 24 hours, 48 hours and during ICU stay (an average of 5 to 7 days or up to 30 days if patient is still in ICU)
within 24 hours, 48 hours and during ICU stay (an average of 5 to 7 days or up to 30 days if patient is still in ICU)
Number of patients with one or several protocol violation(s) and number of those per patient
Time Frame: study intervention period (i.e. 2 hours)
study intervention period (i.e. 2 hours)
Number of patients with adverse events
Time Frame: from randomization to next morning
from randomization to next morning
Number of patients receiving renal replacement therapy
Time Frame: during ICU stay(an average of 5 to 7 days or up to 30 days if patient is still in ICU)
during ICU stay(an average of 5 to 7 days or up to 30 days if patient is still in ICU)
change in mean arterial pressure
Time Frame: from randomization to 2 hours post-randomization
from randomization to 2 hours post-randomization
change in heart rate
Time Frame: from randomization to 2 hours post-randomization
from randomization to 2 hours post-randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Suvi Vaara, MD, PhD, Helsinki University Central Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 10, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 10, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 10, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 1, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

August 9, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 14, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

Clinical Trials on follow-up without intervention

3
Subscribe