Comparison of Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus With Continuous Epidural Infusion for Labor Epidural Analgesia

December 27, 2016 updated by: Caijuan Li, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital
Sixteen million babies were born in 2010, approximately half were by cesarean. Labor analgesia should be the first choice for these parturients based on the consideration of security and humanization. However this labor analgesia rate is quite low in China (<5%) while in western country, this rate is up to 60%. Programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) is the latest technique for labor analgesia which has less neurotoxicity theoretically compared with Continuous Epidural Infusion(CEI) with Patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) which is used most commonly. In that study, they reported less total local anesthetic consumption, fewer manual bolus doses and greater patient satisfaction with the PIEB technique. In China, multiple factors contribute to the reasons of low labor analgesia rate. From the patient's point of view, worrying about unsatisfied analgesia, and not adapted to the symptoms of motor block, such as inability to move their legs distressing, both are important reasons of refusing labor analgesia and preferring to cesarean delivery. Therefore, in this clinical trial, we plan to find a safer and more effective regimen for labor analgesia in Chineseparturients. This clinical trial is designed to prove PIEB used Ropivacaine is safer and more effective than CEI for labor analgesia in Chinese parturients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

186

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210004
        • Recruiting
        • Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who agree to join this study
  • Age: 22y-40y
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1 or 2
  • Gestation : 37-41 weeks
  • Primipara
  • Singleton fetus and head presentation
  • In early labor: cervical dilation for 1-3cm
  • Requesting labor epidural analgesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication for epidural analgesia
  • Height less than 150 cm or more than 170 cm
  • Morbid obesity (BMI more than 35)
  • High-risk pregnancy:(gestational diabetes mellitus, gestational hypertension, placenta previa, placental abruption, preeclampsia)
  • Received parenteral opioids
  • Unable to perform motor block evaluation tests

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: CEI
Initial loading dose:10 ml (0.125% ropivacaine with 0.4 μg/ml sufentanil) Epidural infusion with maintain dose: 0.08% ropivacaine with 0.4 μg/ml sufentanil. The basal infusion of CEI: 10 ml/h, beginning immediately after the initial dose
Active Comparator: PIEB 1
Initial loading dose:10 ml (0.125% ropivacaine with 0.4 μg/ml sufentanil) Epidural infusion with maintain dose: 0.08% ropivacaine with 0.4 μg/ml sufentanil.The basal infusion of PIEB1: 5 ml per 30 min, beginning 30 min after the initial dose
Active Comparator: PIEB 2
Initial loading dose:10 ml (0.125% ropivacaine with 0.4 μg/ml sufentanil) Epidural infusion with maintain dose: 0.08% ropivacaine with 0.4 μg/ml sufentanil. The basal infusion of PIEB2: 10 ml per 60 min, beginning 60 min after the initial dose

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maternal visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: At time of initiation of analgesia and hourly thereafter until 1 hours postpartum (approximately 10 hours)
a visual analog scale (VAS) with a 10 cm vertical score ranged from "no pain" to "worst possible pain"
At time of initiation of analgesia and hourly thereafter until 1 hours postpartum (approximately 10 hours)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Maternal modified Bromage scale
Time Frame: At time of initiation of analgesia and hourly thereafter until 2 hours postpartum (approximately 10 hours)
At time of initiation of analgesia and hourly thereafter until 2 hours postpartum (approximately 10 hours)
Subject's Satisfaction with labor epidural analgesia
Time Frame: At the time after childbirth
At the time after childbirth
Total ropivacaine and sufentanil consumption
Time Frame: At two hours postpartum
At two hours postpartum
Proportion of parturients requiring additional PCEA boluses
Time Frame: At two hours postpartum
At two hours postpartum
Rate of "very satisfied"and/or "satisfied",Proportion of subjects who has experienced Visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain more than 3 scale
Time Frame: At two hours postpartum
At two hours postpartum
Maternal heart rate
Time Frame: At time of initiation of analgesia and hourly thereafter until 4 hours postpartum (approximately 12 hours)
At time of initiation of analgesia and hourly thereafter until 4 hours postpartum (approximately 12 hours)
Rates of cesarean delivery and instrument-assisted delivery
Time Frame: At time of placental delivery
At time of placental delivery
Duration of analgesia
Time Frame: Initiation of analgesia to 2 h postpartum (approximately 10 hours)
Initiation of analgesia to 2 h postpartum (approximately 10 hours)
Durations of labor stages
Time Frame: From the beginning of regular contraction of uterus to the end of the labor (approximately 12 hours)
From the beginning of regular contraction of uterus to the end of the labor (approximately 12 hours)
Use of oxytocin after analgesia
Time Frame: At twenty-four hours postpartum
At twenty-four hours postpartum
Incidence of maternal side effects
Time Frame: Initiation of analgesia to 2 hour postpartum (approximately 10 hours)
Initiation of analgesia to 2 hour postpartum (approximately 10 hours)
Neonatal Apgar scale
Time Frame: At the first and fifth minutes after baby was born
At the first and fifth minutes after baby was born
Fetal heart rate
Time Frame: From initiation of analgesia to delivery (approximately 8 hours)
From initiation of analgesia to delivery (approximately 8 hours)
Neonatal weight
Time Frame: At delivery
At delivery
Mean number of PCEA
Time Frame: At two hours postpartum
At two hours postpartum
Maternal respiratory rate
Time Frame: At time of initiation of analgesia and hourly thereafter until 4 hours postpartum (approximately 12 hours)
At time of initiation of analgesia and hourly thereafter until 4 hours postpartum (approximately 12 hours)
Maternal blood pressure
Time Frame: At time of initiation of analgesia and hourly thereafter until 4 hours postpartum (approximately 12 hours)
At time of initiation of analgesia and hourly thereafter until 4 hours postpartum (approximately 12 hours)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 11, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

August 19, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 28, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 27, 2016

Last Verified

December 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Labor Analgesia

Clinical Trials on Epidural analgesia

3
Subscribe