- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02873091
Comparison of Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus With Continuous Epidural Infusion for Labor Epidural Analgesia
December 27, 2016 updated by: Caijuan Li, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital
Sixteen million babies were born in 2010, approximately half were by cesarean.
Labor analgesia should be the first choice for these parturients based on the consideration of security and humanization.
However this labor analgesia rate is quite low in China (<5%) while in western country, this rate is up to 60%.
Programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) is the latest technique for labor analgesia which has less neurotoxicity theoretically compared with Continuous Epidural Infusion(CEI) with Patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) which is used most commonly.
In that study, they reported less total local anesthetic consumption, fewer manual bolus doses and greater patient satisfaction with the PIEB technique.
In China, multiple factors contribute to the reasons of low labor analgesia rate.
From the patient's point of view, worrying about unsatisfied analgesia, and not adapted to the symptoms of motor block, such as inability to move their legs distressing, both are important reasons of refusing labor analgesia and preferring to cesarean delivery.
Therefore, in this clinical trial, we plan to find a safer and more effective regimen for labor analgesia in Chineseparturients.
This clinical trial is designed to prove PIEB used Ropivacaine is safer and more effective than CEI for labor analgesia in Chinese parturients.
Study Overview
Status
Unknown
Conditions
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
186
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Caijuan Li, M.A.
- Phone Number: 025-52226112
- Email: licaijuanyumi1228@126.com
Study Locations
-
-
Jiangsu
-
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210004
- Recruiting
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University
-
Contact:
- Shanwu Feng, MD
- Email: shanwufeng@163.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
22 years to 40 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects who agree to join this study
- Age: 22y-40y
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1 or 2
- Gestation : 37-41 weeks
- Primipara
- Singleton fetus and head presentation
- In early labor: cervical dilation for 1-3cm
- Requesting labor epidural analgesia
Exclusion Criteria:
- Contraindication for epidural analgesia
- Height less than 150 cm or more than 170 cm
- Morbid obesity (BMI more than 35)
- High-risk pregnancy:(gestational diabetes mellitus, gestational hypertension, placenta previa, placental abruption, preeclampsia)
- Received parenteral opioids
- Unable to perform motor block evaluation tests
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: CEI
Initial loading dose:10 ml (0.125% ropivacaine with 0.4 μg/ml sufentanil) Epidural infusion with maintain dose: 0.08% ropivacaine with 0.4 μg/ml sufentanil.
The basal infusion of CEI: 10 ml/h, beginning immediately after the initial dose
|
|
Active Comparator: PIEB 1
Initial loading dose:10 ml (0.125% ropivacaine with 0.4 μg/ml sufentanil) Epidural infusion with maintain dose: 0.08% ropivacaine with 0.4 μg/ml sufentanil.The basal infusion of PIEB1: 5 ml per 30 min, beginning 30 min after the initial dose
|
|
Active Comparator: PIEB 2
Initial loading dose:10 ml (0.125% ropivacaine with 0.4 μg/ml sufentanil) Epidural infusion with maintain dose: 0.08% ropivacaine with 0.4 μg/ml sufentanil.
The basal infusion of PIEB2: 10 ml per 60 min, beginning 60 min after the initial dose
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Maternal visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: At time of initiation of analgesia and hourly thereafter until 1 hours postpartum (approximately 10 hours)
|
a visual analog scale (VAS) with a 10 cm vertical score ranged from "no pain" to "worst possible pain"
|
At time of initiation of analgesia and hourly thereafter until 1 hours postpartum (approximately 10 hours)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
Maternal modified Bromage scale
Time Frame: At time of initiation of analgesia and hourly thereafter until 2 hours postpartum (approximately 10 hours)
|
At time of initiation of analgesia and hourly thereafter until 2 hours postpartum (approximately 10 hours)
|
Subject's Satisfaction with labor epidural analgesia
Time Frame: At the time after childbirth
|
At the time after childbirth
|
Total ropivacaine and sufentanil consumption
Time Frame: At two hours postpartum
|
At two hours postpartum
|
Proportion of parturients requiring additional PCEA boluses
Time Frame: At two hours postpartum
|
At two hours postpartum
|
Rate of "very satisfied"and/or "satisfied",Proportion of subjects who has experienced Visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain more than 3 scale
Time Frame: At two hours postpartum
|
At two hours postpartum
|
Maternal heart rate
Time Frame: At time of initiation of analgesia and hourly thereafter until 4 hours postpartum (approximately 12 hours)
|
At time of initiation of analgesia and hourly thereafter until 4 hours postpartum (approximately 12 hours)
|
Rates of cesarean delivery and instrument-assisted delivery
Time Frame: At time of placental delivery
|
At time of placental delivery
|
Duration of analgesia
Time Frame: Initiation of analgesia to 2 h postpartum (approximately 10 hours)
|
Initiation of analgesia to 2 h postpartum (approximately 10 hours)
|
Durations of labor stages
Time Frame: From the beginning of regular contraction of uterus to the end of the labor (approximately 12 hours)
|
From the beginning of regular contraction of uterus to the end of the labor (approximately 12 hours)
|
Use of oxytocin after analgesia
Time Frame: At twenty-four hours postpartum
|
At twenty-four hours postpartum
|
Incidence of maternal side effects
Time Frame: Initiation of analgesia to 2 hour postpartum (approximately 10 hours)
|
Initiation of analgesia to 2 hour postpartum (approximately 10 hours)
|
Neonatal Apgar scale
Time Frame: At the first and fifth minutes after baby was born
|
At the first and fifth minutes after baby was born
|
Fetal heart rate
Time Frame: From initiation of analgesia to delivery (approximately 8 hours)
|
From initiation of analgesia to delivery (approximately 8 hours)
|
Neonatal weight
Time Frame: At delivery
|
At delivery
|
Mean number of PCEA
Time Frame: At two hours postpartum
|
At two hours postpartum
|
Maternal respiratory rate
Time Frame: At time of initiation of analgesia and hourly thereafter until 4 hours postpartum (approximately 12 hours)
|
At time of initiation of analgesia and hourly thereafter until 4 hours postpartum (approximately 12 hours)
|
Maternal blood pressure
Time Frame: At time of initiation of analgesia and hourly thereafter until 4 hours postpartum (approximately 12 hours)
|
At time of initiation of analgesia and hourly thereafter until 4 hours postpartum (approximately 12 hours)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
September 1, 2016
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
May 1, 2017
Study Completion (Anticipated)
October 1, 2017
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 11, 2016
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 18, 2016
First Posted (Estimate)
August 19, 2016
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
December 28, 2016
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 27, 2016
Last Verified
December 1, 2016
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Nervous System Diseases
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Neurobehavioral Manifestations
- Perceptual Disorders
- Agnosia
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Analgesics
- Sensory System Agents
- Anesthetics, Intravenous
- Anesthetics, General
- Anesthetics
- Analgesics, Opioid
- Narcotics
- Adjuvants, Anesthesia
- Anesthetics, Local
- Ropivacaine
- Sufentanil
Other Study ID Numbers
- NJFY2016002
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Labor Analgesia
-
Yale UniversityNot yet recruitingLabor AnalgesiaUnited States
-
Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care HospitalUnknown
-
Hospital Universitario La PazCompletedLabor Epidural AnalgesiaSpain
-
University of CagliariUnknownEpidural Analgesia | Labor | Nulliparous
-
Ohio State UniversityWithdrawnAdministration Methods of Labor AnalgesiaUnited States
-
Tanta UniversityCompletedEpidural Analgesia | Dexmedetomidine | Fentanyl | Painless Labor | LevobupivacaineEgypt
-
Medical University of South CarolinaCompletedLabor Pain | Labor AnalgesiaUnited States
-
Shanghai First Maternity and Infant HospitalCompletedLabor Pain | Labor AnalgesiaChina
-
Zuyderland Medisch CentrumDiakonessenhuis, UtrechtRecruitingLabor Pain | Virtual Reality | Labor AnalgesiaNetherlands
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalCompletedLaboring Women Requesting Neuraxial Labor AnalgesiaUnited States
Clinical Trials on Epidural analgesia
-
ShanWu Feng, M.D.UnknownPain | Neurologic Manifestations | Labor Pain | Signs and Symptoms | Pathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsChina
-
Nanjing Medical UniversityHRSA/Maternal and Child Health BureauCompleted
-
Meir Medical CenterCompletedPatients With Acute Pain Admitted to the Intensive Care UnitIsrael
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandCompletedCritical Illness | Epidural AnalgesiaFrance
-
Helsinki University Central HospitalUniversity of HelsinkiRecruitingPancreatic Diseases | Pancreas CancerFinland
-
Université de SherbrookeRecruitingAnalgesia, EpiduralCanada
-
Cairo UniversityActive, not recruitingDural Puncture Epidural TechniqueEgypt
-
Helsinki University Central HospitalCompleted
-
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal UniversityUnknownUterine Artery Embolization for Uterine LeiomyomataSaudi Arabia