Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Bleselumab in Preventing the Recurrence of Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis in de Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients

A Phase 2a, Randomized, Open-Label, Active Control, Multi-Center Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Bleselumab in Preventing the Recurrence of Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis in de Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of the bleselumab regimen (basiliximab induction, tacrolimus, steroids and bleselumab) compared with the Standard of Care (SOC) regimen (basiliximab induction, tacrolimus, steroids and mycophenolate mofetil [MMF]) in the prevention of recurrent Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (rFSGS) defined as nephrotic range proteinuria with protein-creatinine ratio (≥ 3.0 g/g) through 3 months post-transplant. Death, graft loss or lost to follow-up were imputed as rFSGS.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study consisted of the following periods: Screening (Days -21 to -1), Transplant (Day 0), Post-Transplant (Day 0/post-skin closure through 12 months post-transplant). All subjects entered into a Screening Period (Days -21 to -1 prior to transplant), and underwent a Transplant (Day 0 [zero]), and then followed for up to 12 months in the Post-Transplant Period (Day 0 through 12 months post-transplant).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

67

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, TG6 2B7
        • Site CA15002
    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6Z 1Y6
        • Site CA15005
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H1T 2M4
        • Site CA15006
    • Arizona
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85724
        • University of Arizona
    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304
        • Stanford School of Medicine
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
        • UCSF
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • University of Colorado
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • University of Miami
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
        • University of Chicago
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46220
        • Indiana University
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202
        • University Of Louisville
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70112
        • Tulane University Health Service Center
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • Michigan Medicine
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University in St. Louis
    • New Jersey
      • Livingston, New Jersey, United States, 07039
        • St. Barnabas
    • New York
      • Buffalo, New York, United States, 14215
        • Erie County Medical Center
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University Medical Center
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27713
        • University of North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Medical Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • University of Pennsylvania Health System, PCAM
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Medical University of South Carolina
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84132
        • University of Utah Medical Center
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22908
        • University of Virginia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is a recipient of a de novo kidney from a living or deceased donor and has biopsy-proven, primary FSGS (pFSGS) as a cause of end stage renal disease (ESRD) in the subject's native kidneys (initial diagnosing biopsy report is required). A subject who has biopsy-proven pFSGS as a cause of ESRD, and the subject's most current graft failure(s) is due to the recurrence of FSGS, is eligible.
  • Subject is anticipated to receive first oral dose of tacrolimus within 48 hours of transplant procedure.
  • Subject must be willing and able to comply with the study requirements including prohibited concomitant medication restrictions.
  • Subject agrees not to participate in another interventional study while on treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has Induction therapy, other than study-assigned basiliximab, planned as part of initial immunosuppressive regimen.
  • Subject has a diagnosis of secondary FSGS (familial, virus associated, medication, etc.) or a defined genetic cause of FSGS.
  • Subject has previously received any organ transplant including a kidney and the most current graft failure(s) is not due to the recurrence of FSGS.
  • Subject will receive a kidney as part of a multi-organ transplant.
  • Subject will receive a dual kidney transplant from a deceased donor.
  • Subject will receive a kidney with an anticipated cold ischemia time (CIT) of > 30 hours.
  • Subject will receive a kidney that meets BOTH Extended Criteria Donor (ECD) and Donation after Cardiac Death (DCD) criteria. (A kidney that meets either ECD OR DCD criteria may be eligible for inclusion.)
  • Subject will receive a blood group system (A, AB, B, O, ABO) incompatible (including A2 into B or O) donor kidney.
  • Recipient or donor is known to be seropositive for human immuno-deficiency virus (HIV).
  • Subject has a current calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) level > 50%.
  • Subject has a current malignancy or a history of malignancy (within the past 5 years), except nonmetastatic basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that has been treated successfully, or a renal cell carcinoma that has been treated successfully more than 2 years prior to transplantation.
  • Subject has significant liver disease, defined as having during the past 21 days consistently elevated aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (SGOT) and/or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (SGPT) levels greater than 1.5 times the upper value of the normal range of the investigational site.
  • Subject is known to have a positive test for latent tuberculosis (TB) and has not previously received adequate anti-microbial therapy/or would require TB prophylaxis after transplant.
  • Subject has an uncontrolled concomitant infection or any other unstable medical condition that could interfere with the study objectives.
  • Subject is concurrently participating in another drug study or has received an investigational drug up to 30 days or 5 half-lives prior to transplant.
  • Subject is currently receiving or has received up to 8 weeks prior to transplant an immunologic biologic compound (i.e., tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, [e.g., etanercept, adalimumab], intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG)). A subject who has previously received a kidney organ transplant and is currently on an immunosuppression regimen that includes MMF, or any of its components, must discontinue MMF.
  • Subject has previously received bleselumab or participated in a clinical study with bleselumab.
  • Subject has a known hypersensitivity to tacrolimus, MMF, basiliximab, corticosteroids, or any of the components.
  • Subject has any form of substance abuse, psychiatric disorder, or a condition that could invalidate communication with the Investigator.
  • Subject has a clinically significant abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG) at Screening.
  • Subject is unlikely to comply with the visits scheduled in the protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard of Care (SOC) Regimen
Participants received SOC regimen (basiliximab induction, MMF, Tacrolimus, Methylprednisone, Prednisolone). Basiliximab 20 milligrams (mg) administered by intravenous injection prior to transplantation or intra- operatively before revascularisation as induction therapy and 20mg on day 3 or 4 or 5 post-transplant. MMF 1 gram (g) administered orally or intravenously twice daily until 12 months post transplant. Tacrolimus 0.1 milligram per kilogram per day (mg/kg/day) (two equally divided doses at 0.05 mg/kg/day every 12 hours with a target trough level of 4 - 11 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) administered orally within 48 hours post-transplant until 12 months post transplant. Methylprednisone 500, 250, 125 and 60mg administered orally or intravenously on days 0, 1, 2 and 3 respectively and continue through 12 months post transplant. Prednisolone administered orally by tapered doses of 20-30 mg on days 4-14, 10-20mg on days 15-28, 5-10mg on days 29 through 12 months post transplant.
Bolus injection
Other Names:
  • Simulect®
Oral Intravenous
Other Names:
  • MMF
  • CellCept®
Oral Capsule
Other Names:
  • Prograf®
Oral or Intravenous
Oral Tablet
Experimental: Bleselumab Regimen
Participants received bleselumab regimen (basiliximab induction, bleselumab, Tacrolimus, Methylprednisone, Prednisolone). Basiliximab 20mg administered by intravenous injection prior to transplantation or intra - operatively before revascularisation as induction therapy and 20mg on day 3 or 4 or 5 post-transplant. Bleselumab 200mg administered by intravenous infusion on day 0, 7, 14, 28, 42, 56, 70, 90 and once per month until month 12. Tacrolimus 0.1 mg/kg/day (two equally divided doses at 0.05 mg/kg/day every 12 hours with a target trough level of 4 - 11 ng/mL) administered orally within 48 hours post transplant until 12 months post transplant. Methylprednisone 500, 250, 125 and 60mg administered orally or intravenously on days 0, 1, 2 and 3 respectively and continue through 12 months post transplant. Prednisolone administered orally by tapered doses of 20-30 mg on days 4-14, 10-20mg on days 15-28, 5-10mg on days 29 through 12 months post transplant.
Bolus injection
Other Names:
  • Simulect®
Oral Capsule
Other Names:
  • Prograf®
Oral or Intravenous
Oral Tablet
Intravenous infusion
Other Names:
  • ASKP1240

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Recurrence of Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (rFSGS) or Death or Graft Loss or Lost to Follow-up Through 3 Months Post Transplant
Time Frame: At 3 Months post transplant
rFSGS was defined as nephrotic range proteinuria with a protein/creatinine ratio (≥ 3.0 g/g). Death, graft loss or lost to follow-up was imputed as rFSGS.
At 3 Months post transplant

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With rFSGS or Death or Graft Loss or Lost to Follow-up Through 6 and 12 Months Post Transplant
Time Frame: At 6 and 12 Months post transplant
rFSGS was defined as nephrotic range proteinuria with a protein/creatinine ratio (≥ 3.0 g/g). Death, graft loss or lost to follow-up was imputed as rFSGS.
At 6 and 12 Months post transplant
Percentage of Participants With Biopsy-Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) Through 3, 6, and 12 Months Post Transplant
Time Frame: At 3, 6 and 12 Months post transplant
All episodes of kidney dysfunction based on clinical signs and symptoms were evaluated for possible BPAR. BPAR was confirmed if participants Banff criteria >=1.
At 3, 6 and 12 Months post transplant
Percentage of Participants With Efficacy Failure Through 12 Months Post Transplant
Time Frame: 12 Months post transplant
Efficacy failure was defined as BPAR, death, graft loss or lost to follow-up through 12 months post transplant.
12 Months post transplant
Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven rFSGS Through 3, 6 and 12 Months Post-Transplant
Time Frame: At 3, 6 and 12 Months post transplant
Percentage of participants with biopsy-proven rFSGS determined by a blinded central review of images from electron microscopy (EM) and slides for light microscopy (LM) by an independent pathologist.
At 3, 6 and 12 Months post transplant

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 22, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 11, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

May 18, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 30, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

October 3, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Access to anonymized individual participant level data collected during the study, in addition to study-related supporting documentation, is planned for studies conducted with approved product indications and formulations, as well as compounds terminated during development. Studies conducted with product indications or formulations that remain active in development are assessed after study completion to determine if Individual Participant Data can be shared. Conditions and exceptions are described under the Sponsor Specific Details for Astellas on ww.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Access to participant level data is offered to researchers after publication of the primary manuscript (if applicable) and is available as long as Astellas has legal authority to provide the data.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers must submit a proposal to conduct a scientifically relevant analysis of the study data. The research proposal is reviewed by an Independent Research Panel. If the proposal is approved, access to the study data is provided in a secure data sharing environment after receipt of a signed Data Sharing Agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Kidney Transplantation

Clinical Trials on Basiliximab

3
Subscribe