Enhanced Recovery After Spine Surgery

July 27, 2020 updated by: Hospital for Special Surgery, New York

Enhanced Recovery After Spine Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess Quality of Recovery and the Biochemical Stress Response to Lumbar Fusion

Enhanced recovery pathways (ERP) after surgery have been shown to decrease length of stay and perioperative complications in a range of surgical specialties. To date, ERPs has not been studied in patients presenting for spine surgery. The investigators have recently developed an interdisciplinary pathway for spine surgery patients based on the latest available evidence and guidelines. The aim of this trial is to compare the investigators enhanced recovery pathway with conventional perioperative management in patients undergoing 1-2 level posterior lumbar fusion.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

56

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • Hospital for Special Surgery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any patient presenting for 1 or 2 level posterior lumbar fusion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive impairment (baseline dementia, cognitive dysfunction or inability to consent to participate).
  • Kidney disease: GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 for 3 months or more, irrespective of cause (Levey et al., 2012).
  • Liver disease: transaminitis, cirrhosis, hepatitis, hypoalbuminemia, coagulopathy.
  • Pre-existing bowel disease (inflammatory bowel disease, colectomy/ colostomy/diverticular disease).
  • Allergy/intolerance/contraindication to any medication or component included in the ERAS pathway protocol.
  • Patients whose primary or preferred language is not English.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Usual Care
Experimental: Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Spine
The study team emphasizes that all components of the ERP are considered standard of care at this institution. The objective of this study is to ensure that the study patients assigned to the ERP will receive these standard of care components.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Score on QoR40 Inventory.
Time Frame: Postoperative Day 3
The Quality of Recovery 40 (QoR40) is a 40-item questionnaire which assesses five dimensions of recovery after surgery and anesthesia: comfort, emotions, physical independence, patient support and pain. The QoR40 has been validated for both clinical and research use. The QoR-40 has a possible score of 40 (extremely poor quality of recovery) to 200 (excellent quality of recovery).
Postoperative Day 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of Stay and Time From Surgery to Meeting Discharge and Physical Therapy Goals.
Time Frame: Postoperative Day 5
Measured in days after surgery (in half-day increments).
Postoperative Day 5
Pain Control: Opioid Consumption.
Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery
Measured in morphine equivalents daily.
48 hours after surgery
Pain Control: NRS Rating Scales of Pain After Physical Therapy on Postoperative Day 1
Time Frame: Postoperative Day 1
Scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain, 10 being the worst pain possible
Postoperative Day 1
Time to Post-operative Oral Intake.
Time Frame: Postoperative Day 1
Measured in hours
Postoperative Day 1
Number of Participants With Post-operative Nausea, Vomiting and Ileus
Time Frame: Postoperative Day 5
If the patient ever had any of the events of nausea, vomiting, ileus by day of discharge
Postoperative Day 5
Levels of Plasma Markers of Surgical Stress: IL-6 (pg/ml).
Time Frame: Postoperative Days 0, 1, and 3
Postoperative Days 0, 1, and 3
Levels of Plasma Markers of Surgical Stress: Cortisol (mcg/dl).
Time Frame: Postoperative Days 0, 1, and 3
Postoperative Days 0, 1, and 3
Levels of Plasma Markers of Surgical Stress: CRP (mg/dL).
Time Frame: Postoperative Days 0, 1, and 3
Postoperative Days 0, 1, and 3
Levels of Plasma Markers of Surgical Stress: Insulin Resistance (µIU/ml).
Time Frame: Postoperative Days 0, 1, and 3
Postoperative Days 0, 1, and 3
Number of Participants With Presence of Delirium/Confusion, Infection, DVT/PE
Time Frame: Entire Hospital Admission, but Measure at Discharge (Up to Postoperative Day 5)
Incidence of patients with event of delirium/confusion, infection, DVT/PE will be assessed for the entire hospital admission but measured at discharge.
Entire Hospital Admission, but Measure at Discharge (Up to Postoperative Day 5)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ellen Soffin, MD, PhD, Hospital for Special Surgery, NY

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 28, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 7, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

October 31, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 28, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 27, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2016-617

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spine Surgery

Clinical Trials on Enhanced Recovery Pathway (ERP) for Spine

3
Subscribe