A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Chondro-Gide® to Microfracture Alone for Treatment of Knee Cartilage Defects.

February 20, 2017 updated by: Geistlich Pharma AG

Randomised Multi-Center Study: Microfracturing With Chondro-Gide® for the Treatment of Isolated Cartilage Defects in the Knee Project-Nr.: 10830-003

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of using Chondro-Gide® collagen membrane either sutured or glued compared to microfracture alone in the treatment of symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

  • Prospective, randomized, active treatment-controlled, open-label multicenter study (up to 40 sites in the US and EU).
  • All subjects that meet preoperative screening eligibility criteria will be randomized to treatment with Chondro-Gide® either sutured or glued or Microfracture alone.
  • Eligible and consenting subjects are randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio using centralized randomization list to receive one of the following treatments: Group I: Microfracture alone; Group II: Microfracture covered with a Chondro-Gide® membrane glued with fibrin glue (AMIC glued); Group III: Microfracture covered with a Chondro-Gide® membrane sutured (AMIC sutured)
  • All subjects will be assessed at intervals post-procedure (6 weeks, 3 months, and 1,2 and 5 years).
  • Subjects will be required to follow a strict pre-specified post-surgery rehabilitation protocol specific to the defect location.
  • Measures to assess effectiveness and safety will be conducted at all follow-ups.
  • Safety will be assessed by the collection of adverse events at all timepoints.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

67

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bad Abbach, Germany
        • University of Regensburg
      • Freiburg, Germany
        • Universitatsklinikum Freiburg
      • Giessen, Germany
        • Universitätsklinikum Gießen
      • Hamburg, Germany
        • Orthopedikum Hamburg
      • Hanover, Germany
        • Unfallklinik Hannover
      • Lubeck, Germany
        • University of Schleswig-Holstein
      • Ravensburg, Germany
        • Sportklinik Ravensburg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female between 18 and 50
  • One or two cartilage defects Grade III or IV according to Outerbridge classification
  • Defect size between 2 and 10 cm2 (inclusive)
  • Intact normal surrounding cartilage to suture the Chondro-Gide® membrane
  • Informed consent
  • Patient willing to fulfill a strict postoperative physiotherapy scheme

Exclusion Criteria:

  • More than 2 defects
  • Defects on both knees
  • X-ray signs of osteoarthritis
  • Bone lesion > 0.7 cm in the defect
  • Knee instability, varus or valgus deformation, status after complete meniscus resection, status after mosaicplasty, patella dysplasia
  • Rheumatoid, infectious disease
  • Skin lesion on the operated knee
  • Treatment with cartilage building medication
  • Drug and alcohol abuse
  • Chronic heart disease, endocrine or metabolic disease, Haemophilia A/B
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Collagen allergy
  • Participation in other Trials

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: microfracture
Microfracture is an arthroscopic surgical technique involving placement of microfracture penetrations within the cartilage defect to provide stem cells and growth factors from the bone marrow to aid cartilage repair
Microfracture is a well-established arthroscopic surgical technique for cartilage repair which involves several systematic steps, including debridement to a stable cartilage margin, careful removal of the calcified cartilage layer, and homogeneous placement of microfracture penetrations within the cartilage defect, with resultant complete defect fill by a well-anchored clot
Experimental: Microfracture with Chondro-Gide sutured
Microfracture covered with a collagen membrane (Chondro-Gide®) using atraumatic sutures in a one-step mini-arthrotomy procedure
Implantation of Chondro-Gide membrane using atraumatic sutures following microfracture via mini-arthrotomy
Experimental: Microfracture with Chondro-Gide glued
Microfracture covered with a collagen membrane (Chondro-Gide®) using fibrin glue in a one-step mini-arthrotomy procedure
Implantation of Chondro-Gide membrane using Fibrin glue following microfracture via mini-arthrotomy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Histological evaluation of structural repair of evaluable biopsies harvested from the core of the index lesion during arthroscopy at 2 years
Time Frame: 2 years post-surgery
The macroscopically assessed integration, surface properties and extent of filling of the defect and the microscopically assessed using the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) score
2 years post-surgery
MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) assessment of structural repair parameters.
Time Frame: 6 months and 1,2 and 5 years post-surgery
Structural repair is assessed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, 1.5T) by an independent and blinded radiologist, with a focus on the extent, signal intensity and surface of the defect filling, integration to adjacent cartilage, and bone marrow lesion (BML).
6 months and 1,2 and 5 years post-surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in the patient's evaluation of overall knee condition using the Modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System.
Time Frame: 6 months and 1,2 and 5 years post-surgery
The Change from Baseline will be evaluated.
6 months and 1,2 and 5 years post-surgery
Change from Baseline in the patient's evaluation of pain using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Time Frame: 6 months and 1,2 and 5 years post-surgery
The Change from Baseline will be evaluated.
6 months and 1,2 and 5 years post-surgery
Change from Baseline in the patient's evaluation of overall knee condition using the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) "Cartilage Injury Evaluation Package".
Time Frame: 6 months and 1,2 and 5 years post-surgery
The Change from Baseline will be evaluated.
6 months and 1,2 and 5 years post-surgery
Adverse Events (AE) Review
Time Frame: 5 years post-surgery
The incidence, timing, severity, and relationship to treatment of all Adverse Events (AE), will be collected for all participants.
5 years post-surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sven Anders, MD, University of Regensburg

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 2, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

December 15, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 23, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2017

Last Verified

February 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cartilage Injury

Clinical Trials on Microfracture

3
Subscribe