Comparing Mesenchymal Stem Cell Counts in Unilateral vs. Bilateral Posterior Superior Iliac Spine Bone Marrow Aspiration

December 13, 2021 updated by: Kenneth Mautner, Emory University
Musculoskeletal conditions are common sources of pain. Specifically, osteoarthritis affects nearly 27 million people in the United States. This disease leads to the breakdown of the cartilage surfaces of the joints, which serve as the connection points between the bones of the body, causing a large amount of pain and disability in patients. Increasing the number of available treatment options for osteoarthritis is becoming increasingly more important as Americans continue to age. Using stem cells taken from bone marrow is one of the non-operative treatments that has been gaining popularity in the recent past. This study aims to clarify how this procedure should best be done by comparing stem cell concentrations and patient outcomes (short and long term) in patients who have stem cells taken from one area vs two (unilateral vs bilateral posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) aspirations).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Musculoskeletal conditions are common sources of pain. Specifically, osteoarthritis affects nearly 27 million people in the United States. This disease leads to the breakdown of the cartilage surfaces of the joints, which serve as the connection points between the bones of the body, causing a large amount of pain and disability in patients. Increasing the number of available treatment options for osteoarthritis is becoming increasingly more important as Americans continue to age. Using stem cells taken from bone marrow is one of the non-operative treatments that has been gaining popularity in the recent past. This study aims to clarify how this procedure should best be done by comparing stem cell concentrations and patient outcomes (short and long term) in patients who have stem cells taken from one area vs two (unilateral vs bilateral posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) aspirations).

This research study involves the participant being randomly placed into one of two groups; one group will have cells taken from one hip, and the other will have cells taken from both hips. Both of these approaches are performed in clinics currently, and both are considered to be standard of care. All bone marrow collected for the purposes of this study will be obtained by the principal investigator while performing the standard procedure. In obtaining these sample the physicians will abide by the standard of care set forth for the Bone Marrow Aspiration Concentrate procedure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

35

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • The Emory Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Currently scheduled for a bone marrow aspirate concentration (BMAC) procedure
  • Cognitively able to give consent and complete the required questionnaires

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of leukemia or lymphoma
  • History of any autoimmune disorders and disease
  • Currently taking immunosuppressive medications
  • Presence of an active or suspected infection, or an infection of the joint in question within the past 6 months
  • Vulnerable populations (pregnant women and breast-feeding women)
  • Cortisone injection into the affected joint within 6 weeks
  • Used NSAIDs within 1 week of the procedure
  • History of bleeding disorders or inflammatory joint disease
  • Surgical intervention on the affected or contralateral joint within 6 months of BMAC injection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: Unilateral Procurement of Bone Marrow
Participants currently scheduled to undergo a bone marrow aspirate concentration (BMAC) procedure will be randomized to unilateral procurement of bone marrow.
A total of 61cc of bone marrow will be procured under ultrasound guidance from one posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) via 3 passes, each at least 1 cm apart, through the bone cortex. In each pass, investigators will obtain 2.3cc of BMA with a 60cc syringes.
EXPERIMENTAL: Bilateral Bone Marrow Procurement
Participants currently scheduled to undergo a bone marrow aspirate concentration (BMAC) procedure will be randomized to bilateral procurement of bone marrow.
30.5cc of bone marrow will be obtained under ultrasound guidance from each posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) with 3 passes, at least 1 cm apart, per side (10.17cc per pass) using 60cc syringes. The collection from each PSIS will be combined to yield a total of 61cc.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change Quality of Life assessed by the Emory Quality of Life (EQOL) Survey Score
Time Frame: Pre-treatment, Follow Up (Up to One Year)
The EQOL survey measures five dimensions - mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The participant will be asked to answer questions regarding these measures and to indicate their current experience on a scale from 1 to 3; 1 being "no problem" and 3 being "most extreme problem". The answers to these question are put together to create a 5 digit composite score.This composite score can be indexed to a lookup table which produces a single summary score from 0 to 100. The lookup table we use is weighted and normalized to the United Stated general population.
Pre-treatment, Follow Up (Up to One Year)
Change in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Time Frame: Pre-treatment, Follow Up (Up to One Year)
The KOOS questionnaire is an instrument to assess the patient's opinion about their osteoarthritis and associated problems. It consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee related Quality of life (QOL). Standardized answer options are given (5 Likert boxes) and each question is assigned a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale. A total lower score indicates more problems.
Pre-treatment, Follow Up (Up to One Year)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Capacity of Isolated Cells to Differentiate Down Cell Lineages
Time Frame: Post Cell Culture (Up to 21 Days)
Bone marrow aspirate will be placed in 10 mL heparinized tubes and nucleated cells will be isolated with a density gradient and re-suspended in complete culture medium for plating. Isolated adherent cells will be processed for the ability to differentiate down osteogenic-, adipogenic- and chondrogenic-lineage after cell harvest. Specifically, isolated cells are treated with different media to induce their differentiation into 1) osteo-progenitor cells (identified by positive staining with Alzarian red, 2) adipocytes (identified by positive staining with Oil-Red) and 3) chondrocytes (identified by positive staining with Alcian blue). The presence of these phenotypes should be prevalent by 3 weeks; if not, the cells are not considered pluripotent for that lineage and hence would not be classified as mesenchymal stem cells.
Post Cell Culture (Up to 21 Days)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kenneth Mautner, MD, Emory University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 7, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 13, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 13, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 5, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2017

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 9, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 14, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB00093044

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Unilateral Bone Marrow Procurement

3
Subscribe