Mindfulness Group-based Intervention for Early Psychosis

September 22, 2020 updated by: Lawson Health Research Institute

Mindfulness Group-based Intervention for Early Psychosis: A Multi-Site Randomized Control Trial

Recent research has suggested that mindfulness-based interventions (MBI) for psychosis may be effective in reducing the negative symptoms of schizophrenia (e.g., social withdrawal, lack of motivation) and the distress associated with psychotic symptoms (e.g., hearing voices) and could lead to improvements in functioning and quality of life. MBI research to date has primarily focused on studies of patients with chronic psychotic illness, yet relatively little is known about the use of MBIs for youth recovering from their first episode of psychosis. Results from recently published pilot studies appear promising in terms of the feasibility, acceptability, and potential clinical utility (e.g., improved psychological symptoms) of MBIs for the early psychosis population (Ashcroft et al., 2012; van der Valk et al., 2013; Khoury et al., 2015). The current project team has completed a pilot study at the Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychoses (PEPP) at London Health Sciences Centre (LHSC), wherein the "Mindfulness Ambassador Council" (MAC), a 12-week facilitated group intervention promoting mindfulness skills and the development of emotional and social competencies, was shown to be an effective, feasible, and acceptable means of treating youth in the early stages of psychotic illnesses. In follow up to the initial pilot study, the purpose of this study is to perform a multi-site Randomized Control Trial to determine the effectiveness of the MAC group intervention on reducing psychotic disorder symptomatology for transitional aged youth experiencing early psychosis. The main hypothesis, based on previous findings on the use of MBIs in psychotic disorders, including results from our initial pilot study at PEPP, is that people with early psychosis who participate in the MAC group intervention will experience improvement in mindfulness skills and affective symptoms compared to those receiving treatment as usual (TAU). Furthermore, we expect that people experiencing early psychosis who participate in MAC will have an improvement in their negative symptoms, quality of life, recovery (self-esteem, perceived recovery), perceived coping, assertiveness, social functioning, and cognitive skills, and a reduction in healthcare service utilization (e.g., emergency room visits, inpatient admissions/length of hospitalization).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this multi-site RCT is to determine the effectiveness of the MAC group intervention on reducing psychotic disorder symptomatology (primary outcome) as well as promoting quality of life, critical skills for recovery and decreasing mental health service utilization (secondary outcomes) for transitional aged youth (16-25 years old) experiencing early psychosis. This study is being run at five southern Ontario Early Psychosis Intervention (EPI) sites with Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychoses (PEPP) at London Health Sciences Centre (LHSC) being the lead site. Three of the larger sites (located in London, Kitchener-Waterloo, and Hamilton Ontario) are following the RCT design, while the two smaller sites (located in Chatham-Kent and Sarnia, Ontario) are participating in a pre-post design.

For the three RCT sites we aim to recruit 20-24 participants, and for the pre-post sites we aim to recruit 10 participants (total n=92 participants). Participants at the RCT sites will be randomized into Group-A (n = 12; immediate treatment intervention group) or Group-B (n = 12; delayed treatment intervention group). Group-A will receive the MAC intervention at the onset of the study, while Group-B will receive treatment as usual (TAU). Group-B will have the option of receiving the MAC intervention approximately 6 months after the onset of the study. At all times during this study, participants who are receiving the MAC intervention will also be able to continue receiving TAU. Both groups will be assessed with a battery of quantitative measures at baseline (T1), three months later (i.e., immediately post-MAC intervention) (T2), and again three months post-MAC intervention (T3). The measures include interview assessments of psychotic disorder symptoms, and self-report measures of affect, self-esteem, quality of life, coping strategies, assertiveness, social functioning, mindfulness and cognitive skills. In addition, healthcare utilization records for the 6 months preceding MAC intervention onset and for the 6 month duration of the study (3 month MAC intervention + 3 month post-MAC intervention follow-up period) will be collected. Researchers conducting symptom assessment interviews and data analysis will be blinded to the group membership of participants. For the two pre-post sites, all 10 participants will receive the MAC intervention immediately. All 10 participants will complete T1, T2, and T3 assessments and their healthcare utilization records will also be collected.

Based on the pilot study at PEPP-LHSC, and based on previous findings of Mindfulness Based Interventions for psychoses in the literature, we are expecting that participation in the MAC intervention will result in improvement in the following areas: psychotic symptomology (including affective symptoms), mindfulness skills, quality of life, measures of recovery (self-esteem, perceived recovery), perceived coping, assertiveness, social functioning, cognitive skills, and a reduction in healthcare service utilization (e.g., emergency room visits, inpatient admissions/length of hospitalization).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Chatham, Ontario, Canada, N7L 1C1
        • Canadian Mental Health Association Chatham-Kent Health Alliance
      • Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1H 0A1
        • Canadian Mental Health Association Wellington-Waterloo
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L9C 0E3
        • Cleghorn Early Psychosis Intervention Clinic
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5W9
        • Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychoses
      • Sarnia, Ontario, Canada, N7T 4C7
        • Canadian Mental Health Association Lambton-Kent

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 35 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants must currently be in treatment for psychosis at one of the five Early Psychosis Intervention (EPI) study sites. In addition, participants must have been involved in the program for a period of less than 3 years, due to the focus of this study being on the treatment of early psychosis. Participants must be fluent in English, as determined by referring clinicians or researchers (in the case of advertisement referred participants) in order to meaningfully participate in the MAC intervention and complete the assessment tools.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Potential participants that show high levels of disorganized or disruptive behaviour (as determined by a cut off score of 4 or 5 on the Positive Formal Thought Disorder or Bizarre Behaviour items of the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms [SAPS]) such that they will not be able to meaningfully participate in the MAC intervention will be excluded from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Group-A - Immediate Intervention
Immediate Mindfulness Ambassador Council for Early Psychosis (MAC-EP)
MAC is a 12-week facilitated group mindfulness intervention promoting the development of social-emotional competence in youth created by Mindfulness Without Borders (MWB; www.mwb.org). A meditative practice, mindfulness focuses one's awareness on the present, acknowledging and accepting without judging one's feelings, thoughts, or bodily sensations. Each session has a unique focus (e.g., paying attention, practicing gratitude) and consists of facilitated group learning, discussion and mindfulness skills practice. Home assignments to help reinforce specific lesson are also assigned. MAC has demonstrated acceptability, feasibility, and promising beneficial effects in schools, and in the pilot study conducted at the Early Psychosis Program at London Health Sciences Centre in London, Ontario. Its youth-focus and emphasis on building social and emotional competencies through mindfulness make it a promising intervention for youth recovering from their first episode of psychosis.
Other: Group-B - Delayed Intervention
6 month treatment as usual waitlist followed by Mindfulness Ambassador Council for Early Psychosis (MAC-EP)
MAC is a 12-week facilitated group mindfulness intervention promoting the development of social-emotional competence in youth created by Mindfulness Without Borders (MWB; www.mwb.org). A meditative practice, mindfulness focuses one's awareness on the present, acknowledging and accepting without judging one's feelings, thoughts, or bodily sensations. Each session has a unique focus (e.g., paying attention, practicing gratitude) and consists of facilitated group learning, discussion and mindfulness skills practice. Home assignments to help reinforce specific lesson are also assigned. MAC has demonstrated acceptability, feasibility, and promising beneficial effects in schools, and in the pilot study conducted at the Early Psychosis Program at London Health Sciences Centre in London, Ontario. Its youth-focus and emphasis on building social and emotional competencies through mindfulness make it a promising intervention for youth recovering from their first episode of psychosis.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-Evaluation of Negative Symptoms (SNS)
Time Frame: Baseline, change from Baseline in SNS at 3 months, change from Baseline in SNS at 6 months
Self-report measure for the assessment of negative symptoms
Baseline, change from Baseline in SNS at 3 months, change from Baseline in SNS at 6 months
Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills
Time Frame: Baseline, change from Baseline in KIMS at 3 months, change from Baseline in KIMS at 6 months
Self-report measure of mindfulness skills
Baseline, change from Baseline in KIMS at 3 months, change from Baseline in KIMS at 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES)
Time Frame: Baseline, change from Baseline in RSES at 3 months, change from Baseline in RSES at 6 months
self-report measure of self-esteem
Baseline, change from Baseline in RSES at 3 months, change from Baseline in RSES at 6 months
Profile of Mood States - Short Form (POMS-SF)
Time Frame: Baseline, change from Baseline in POMS-SF at 3 months, change from Baseline in POMS-SF at 6 months
self-report measure of mood
Baseline, change from Baseline in POMS-SF at 3 months, change from Baseline in POMS-SF at 6 months
World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale - Brief version (WHOQOL-BREF)
Time Frame: Baseline, change from Baseline in WHOQOL at 3 months, change from Baseline in WHOQOL at 6 months
self-report measure of quality of life
Baseline, change from Baseline in WHOQOL at 3 months, change from Baseline in WHOQOL at 6 months
Ways of Coping Questionnaire (WCQ)
Time Frame: Baseline, change from Baseline in WCQ at 3 months, change from Baseline in WCQ at 6 months
self-report measure of ways to cope
Baseline, change from Baseline in WCQ at 3 months, change from Baseline in WCQ at 6 months
Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ)
Time Frame: Baseline, change from Baseline in CFQ at 3 months, change from Baseline in CFQ at 6 months
self-report measure of cognitive failures
Baseline, change from Baseline in CFQ at 3 months, change from Baseline in CFQ at 6 months
Rathus Assertiveness Scale (RAS)
Time Frame: Baseline, change from Baseline in RAS at 3 months, change from Baseline in RAS at 6 months
self-report measure of assertiveness
Baseline, change from Baseline in RAS at 3 months, change from Baseline in RAS at 6 months
Health Care Utilization Records Post-Intervention
Time Frame: Utilization at Baseline and during the 6 months following the mindfulness intervention
form to document participant health care utilization
Utilization at Baseline and during the 6 months following the mindfulness intervention
Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills (KIMS)
Time Frame: Baseline, change from Baseline in KIMS at 3 months, change from Baseline in KIMS at 6 months
self-report measure of mindfulness skills
Baseline, change from Baseline in KIMS at 3 months, change from Baseline in KIMS at 6 months
Maryland Assessment of Recovery in People With Serious Mental Illness (MAR)
Time Frame: Baseline, change from Baseline in MAR at 3 months, change from Baseline in MAR at 6 months
self-report measure of perceived self-recovery
Baseline, change from Baseline in MAR at 3 months, change from Baseline in MAR at 6 months
First-Episode Social Functioning Scale (FESFS)
Time Frame: Baseline, change from Baseline in FESFS at 3 months, change from Baseline in FESFS at 6 months
self-report measure of social functioning
Baseline, change from Baseline in FESFS at 3 months, change from Baseline in FESFS at 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Arlene MacDougall, M.Sc. M.D., University of Western Ontario/London Health Sciences Centre

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 22, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 4, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 8, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 24, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 22, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psychotic Disorders

Clinical Trials on Mindfulness Ambassador Council for Early Psychosis (MAC-EP)

3
Subscribe