Dynamic External Fixation in Treatment Distal Radius Fractures - Elderly Patients

May 12, 2017 updated by: Marcio Aurelio Aita, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC

Bridging Versus Non-bridging Dynamic External Fixation in Early Total Care Treatment Unstable Distal Radius Fractures in Elderly Polytrauma Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study

A single center, parallel group, prospective, randomized clinical trial was conducted at the department of Hand Surgery, ABC (Andre, Bernardo, Caetano) Foundation University Hospital, Santo Andre, Brazil. Two implants used for fixation in closed reduction of distal radius fractures were compared: the bridging dynamic Galaxy Wrist external fixator (Orthofix®, Verona) and the non-bridging Galaxy wrist external fixator system (Orthofix®, Verona).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Dynamic external fixator in the ETC (Early Total Care) of unstable DRFs (distal radius fractures) may be a good choice of treatment. Because it's fast, safe, minimally invasive and easily performed method, it could help in the inflammatory systemic response to trauma, unable earlier functional recovery and shorten the hospitalization time of these patients (elderly and polytrauma). From this, in this study to obtain relevant information about each type of treatment, avoid possible selection bias, information and confusion. Choose a reproducible and effective method (external fixator), which presents a cost / benefit compatible with our reality, but that generates doubt the best way to apply this "bridging" which is already used and that will be our control group and "non-bridging", which will be the group to be tested.

Rather than establishing the actual value of each of these procedures, is necessary to optimize and improve the quality of life of these patients in order to return to your personal and professional activities as soon as possible.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

58 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • skeletally mature patients, elderly (60 y.o. or more)
  • all with a diagnosis of unstable distal radius fractures (AO type A or C)
  • associated a multiple injured ( polytrauma ).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ongoing chemo or radiotherapy,
  • mental illness,
  • alcohol abuse.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Bridging (control group)
External fixation in treatment the distal radius fracture
Compare two techniques
Active Comparator: Nonbridging (tested group)
External fixation in treatment the distal radius fracture improve grip strength?
Compare two techniques

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Grip strenght
Time Frame: 12 months
use the specific Jamar Hand Dynamometer to measure the arc of movement the wrist
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
range of wrist motion
Time Frame: 12 months
use the specific goniometer to measure the arc of movement the wrist
12 months
Radiograph assesment
Time Frame: 12 months
Measure ulna and radial shortening, tilt palmar
12 months
DASH Questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 months
measure life quality
12 months
VAS (visual analog scale)
Time Frame: 12 months
patient reported outcome (pain) in scale interval (0 until 10)
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 11, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 32925713.9.0000.0082

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Trauma

Clinical Trials on External fixation in treatment the distal radius fracture

3
Subscribe