Enhancing the Cardiovascular Safety of Hemodialysis Care (Dialysafe) (Dialysafe)

December 19, 2025 updated by: Tiffany Veinot, University of Michigan

Enhancing the Cardiovascular Safety of Hemodialysis Care: A Cluster-Randomized, Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Multimodal Provider Education and Patient Activation Interventions (Dialysafe)

The purpose of this study is reduce episodes of intradialytic hypotension, low blood pressure during a hemodialysis session, in patients with End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). Recruitment will take place on the clinic level rather than the patient level.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

When a person's kidneys stop working, he or she has end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Individuals with ESRD cannot live without either dialysis therapy-in which a machine performs the functions of the kidneys-or a kidney transplant. Dialysis must remove fluid as well as toxins in the blood. People with ESRD have a high risk for death, and the usual cause is cardiovascular disease.

Most people in the United States who have ESRD get hemodialysis therapy in a clinic for four hours at a time, three times a week. The stability of hemodialysis sessions varies, and many sessions become unstable from low blood pressure and other complications. Unstable dialysis sessions can result in negative symptoms, like fatigue.

Dialysis instability is an important problem. Session instability is linked to injury to the heart and other organs. Patients who have unstable dialysis sessions are more likely to end up in the hospital or die than are those who have stable sessions. Session instability is preventable. The main causes of instability are removal of fluid from a patient too fast or removal of too much fluid. Session instability results from many factors: decisions made by patients, and decisions by healthcare providers.

Presently, the way to best improve the stability of dialysis is not clear. Dialysis clinics approach this problem differently, and there is variation among clinics in how often hemodialysis sessions become unstable.

In partnership with the National Kidney Foundation and Fresenius Medical Care North America, the investigators will test two interventions designed to increase the stability of patient dialysis. One intervention, multimodal provider education, focuses on dialysis facility care teams. It includes team training, online education, and a checklist. Another intervention, patient activation, focuses on patients. It includes peer mentoring by trained ESRD patients. Mentors will hold with other patients multimedia-aided meetings that include skills instruction and role modeling. These interventions have been successful in hospital care and in chronic disease care, and the investigators will adapt them to dialysis safety.

The investigators will then conduct a study in 20 dialysis facilities in different parts of the United States. Five facilities will get the provider education only; five will get the patient activation intervention only; five will get both interventions; and five will get no interventions. The investigators will test whether session stability improves in the facilities that get either intervention over the 48-week study period. This study is expected to clarify whether these interventions can make dialysis safer for ESRD patients. This will inform hemodialysis care providers on whether to pursue provider-focused or patient-focused safety interventions, or both. People on hemodialysis will also have information to help them decide whether to become engaged in their session stability, and the intervention will help them learn how to do so.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1431

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48104
        • Fresenius Kidney Care University Of Michigan - Ann Arbor

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Selection is at both the clinic level and individual patient level.

Clinic Inclusion Criteria:

  • outpatient hemodialysis facilities
  • at least 70 adult (>21 years old) patients to guarantee sample size

Clinic Exclusion Criteria:

  • facilities involved in another study
  • facilities in immediate jeopardy
  • facilities with 1-star quality ratings
  • facilities designated as COVID-19 isolation facilities

Individual Patient Exclusion Criteria:

  • individual patients who are currently incarcerated
  • individual patients who have poor cognition or cognitive impairment
  • individual patients unable to comprehend the patient information sheet due to lack of facility in English or Spanish
  • individual patients who have opted out of data collection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patient Activation
This arm focuses on patients. It includes peer mentoring by trained End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) patients. Mentors will hold 5 multimedia-aided meetings with other patients that include motivational interviewing and role modeling.
Patients in clinics assigned to this group will be offered peer mentoring and digital resources.
Experimental: Provider Education
This arm focuses on dialysis facility care teams. It includes team training, online education, and checklists.
Staff in clinics assigned to this group will receive team training and a checklist.
No Intervention: No Intervention
Patients in clinic receive usual care.
Experimental: Patient and Provider
This arm includes both Patient Activation and Provider Education interventions
Patients in clinics assigned to this group will be offered peer mentoring and digital resources.
Staff in clinics assigned to this group will receive team training and a checklist.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dialysis Session Stability
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Systolic blood pressure (SBP) falling below 100 mmHg (using lowest SBP during session) if starting SBP ≥100.
24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fluid Adherence
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Measured by interdialytic weight gain (in Kilograms), which is the weight gained between dialysis sessions (presented as average throughout 24 week intervention period)
24 weeks
Dialysis Adherence - Average Weekly Minutes Missed Over Intervention Period
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Measured as the average number of minutes of prescribed dialysis time missed per week during intervention period (number of prescribed minutes-number of actual minutes/24 week intervention period).
24 weeks
Dialysis Adherence - Average Weekly Sessions Missed During Intervention Period
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Measured as the average number of missed sessions per week during the intervention period (number of prescribed sessions-number of actual sessions/24 week intervention period).
24 weeks
Patient Symptoms - Post-dialysis Recovery Time
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Measured at midweek session as patient recovery time after dialysis, reported on a survey item on an ordinal scale from "within minutes" to "did not recover before the next scheduled dialysis session." Responses grouped into three categories for analysis: "did not recover," "recovered before reaching home," and "recovered on same day of treatment." Sessions categorized as "recovered before reaching home" used for comparison between study arms.
24 weeks
Patient Symptoms - Symptom Burden
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Measured as the total number symptoms reported by the patient at each session (each symptom treated as one, then added to create total symptoms).
24 weeks
Quality of Life-KDQOL - MCS
Time Frame: post-intervention survey
Total score measured by adding responses on the Kidney Disease Quality of Life survey (KDQOLTM-36 Version 1). MCS (mental component summary) subscale ranges from 5.8 - 69.9; higher scores represent better functioning.
post-intervention survey
Quality of Life-KDQOL - PCS
Time Frame: post-intervention survey
Total score measured by adding responses on the Kidney Disease Quality of Life survey (KDQOLTM-36 Version 1). PCS (physical component summary) ranges from 7.3 - 70.1; higher scores represent better functioning.
post-intervention survey
Hospitalization
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Hospitalization rates, measured as a total number of hospital admission for any reason per total patients year ("all-cause hospitalizations")
24 weeks
Mortality
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Mortality rates, measured as a total number of deaths due to any cause per 100 patient years during the study period ("all-cause mortality").
24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tiffany Veinot, PhD, University of Michigan

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 11, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 17, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 13, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 25, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 31, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 14, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Diseases

Clinical Trials on Patient Activation

Subscribe