BUCY+VP-16 vs BUCY Conditioning Regimen for DLBCL Undergoing Auto-HSCT

October 11, 2017 updated by: Qifa Liu, Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University

Busulfan+ Cyclophosphamide+ Etoposide vs Busulfan+ Cyclophosphamide Conditioning Regimen for Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BUCY+VP-16 and BUCY myeloablative conditioning regimens in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Auto-HSCT) is an effective therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).BuCY conditioning regimen is a conventional scheme for DLBCL patients undergoing auto-HSCT, but it has a high relapse rate. Etoposide (VP-16) is extensively used in chemotherapy regimen for refractory/relapsed lymphoma. Whether addition of VP-16 could reduce the relapse rate remains unclear.In this study, the safety and efficacy of BUCY+VP-16 and BUCY myeloablative conditioning regimens in DLBCL undergoing auto-HSCT are evaluated.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

122

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510515
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Hematology,Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 65 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients
  • Achieving CR or PR after four cycles of chemotherapy, then mobilizing and collecting of peripheral blood stem cells and receiving one cycle of chemotherapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any abnormality in a vital sign (e.g., heart rate, respiratory rate, or blood pressure)
  • Patients with any conditions not suitable for the trial (investigators' decision

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: BUCY+VP-16
For DLBCL patients undergoing auto-HSCT,BUCY+VP-16 conditioning regimen was BU 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -7 and -4;CY 60 mg/kg/day on days -3 and -2; VP-16 15mg/kg/day on days -3 and -2.
Busulfan was administered at 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -7 to -4.
Cyclophosphamide was administered at 60 mg/kg/day on days -3 to -2.
Etoposide was administered at 15 mg/kg/day on days -3 to -2.
Active Comparator: BUCY
For DLBCL patients undergoing auto-HSCT,BUCY conditioning regimen was BU 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -7 and -4;CY 60 mg/kg/day on days -3 and -2.
Busulfan was administered at 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -7 to -4.
Cyclophosphamide was administered at 60 mg/kg/day on days -3 to -2.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
relapse rate
Time Frame: 2 year
relapse rate
2 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
OS
Time Frame: 2 year
overall survival (OS)
2 year
DFS
Time Frame: 2 year
disease-free survival (DFS)
2 year
TRM
Time Frame: 2 year
transplant-related mortality (TRM)
2 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 5, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 23, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 25, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 12, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Conditioning

Clinical Trials on Busulfan (BU)

3
Subscribe