The Application of Cognitive Rehabilitation Therapy for Amphetamine-type Stimulants Addiction

January 8, 2020 updated by: Shanghai Mental Health Center
The computerized cognitive rehabilitation therapy will be used to treat amphetamine-type stimulant (ATS) addiction.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The deficits in executive functions related to prefrontal-striatal circuits play a vital role in ATS addiction and relapse, and proposed computerized cognitive rehabilitation therapy as the novel interventions. Focused on evaluating and training executive functions including working memory, inhibitory control, cognitive flexibility, and congitive bias concerning prefrontal-striatal circuits, neuropsychological tests, electroencephalography tests, magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and functional MRI will be used to evaluate the therapeutic effect of ATS addiction treatment as well as investigate the mechanisms. The study will be very helpful to develop novel interventions in clinical practice and decrease ATS-related harm for both the patients and their families.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Shanghai, China
        • Shanghai Compulsory Isolation Detoxification Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. diagnosed MA dependence in accordance with the fourth edition of the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) (Association, 2000);
  2. more than 9 years of education;
  3. aged of 18-60 years old;
  4. normal vision, audition and no color blindness;
  5. receive no detoxification medications during treatment and
  6. right handedness.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. current medical diseases that required hospitalization or regular monitoring;
  2. serious physical or neurological illness that required pharmacological treatment affecting cognitive function;
  3. history of major psychiatric disorder such as bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, depression and disorders of high comorbidity with substance abuse/dependence;
  4. neurological diseases such as stroke, seizure, migraine, head trauma
  5. substance dependence other than nicotine, within the past 5 years;
  6. intelligence quotient (IQ) <70.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: cognitive function rehabilitation group
The main content of cognitive function rehabilitation esecutive function,including working memory,sustained attention, response inhibition function and cognitive flexibility, 45 minutes a day over 6 weeks period.
cognitive rehabilitation focus on the deficits executive funcitin and elevated cognitive bias
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: cognitive bias modification group
The main content of cognitive bias modification groups were changing ATS related attention bias, 45 minutes a day over 6 weeks period.
cognitive rehabilitation focus on the deficits executive funcitin and elevated cognitive bias
NO_INTERVENTION: control group
Participants only accept the regular scheduled in the compulsory isolated detoxification center

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline Craving for ATS assessed by Visual Analog Scales (VAS) at 1 month , 3 month and 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 month and 6 months
evaluate all participants' craving for ATS by Visual Analog Scales (VAS): The scores of the VAS were 0-10 points. 10 points reflect the highest level of individual's craving, and 0 point reflect no craving in patient.
Baseline, 1 month, 3 month and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cognitive function assessed by CogState Battery (CSB)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 month and 6 months
evaluate all participants' cognitive function by the computerized CogState Battery (CSB) Chinese version: The five tasks listed below were examined. International shopping list task (ISLT, verbal learning and memory), the score is defined as the total number of correct responses. Continuous paired association learning task (CPAL) taps spatial working memory. Groton maze learning task (GML) taps problem solving/error monitoring. The scores of CPAL and GML tasks are the total number of errors. Social emotional cognition task (SEC, social cognition) asks the subjects to pick out the different facial expressions. Two back task (TWOB, working memory) requires subjects to decide whether a card is identical to the one shown just before. The scores of TWOB and SEC tasks are the proportion of correct responses, denoting the accuracy of performance. The higher values represent a better outcome in ISL, SEC and TWOB. The higher values represent a worse outcome in GML and CPAL.
Baseline, 1 month, 3 month and 6 months
Changing of response inhibition ablility assessed by Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 month and 6 months
evaluate all participants' response inhibition function by Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART): Several indices were computed to represent the behavioral performance, including the ratio of all pumps to numbers of win trials, the ratio of pumps to numbers in win trials, and the number of win trials. The higher values represent a worse outcome.
Baseline, 1 month, 3 month and 6 months
Number of participants who relapse
Time Frame: 1 month, 3 month and 6 months
Follow up with patients after discharge, evaluate number of participants who relapse. The higher values represent a worse outcome.
1 month, 3 month and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Zhao Min, PhD, MD, Shanghai Mental Health Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 20, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 31, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 15, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 23, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 13, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Amphetamine Addiction

Clinical Trials on cognitive function rehabilitation and bias modification

3
Subscribe