Thoracic Spinal Versus Epidural Anesthesia for Nephrectomy in Obstructive/Restrictive Lung Disease Patients

July 22, 2019 updated by: Nazmy Edward Seif

Comparative Study of Mid-thoracic Spinal Versus Epidural Anesthesia for Open Nephrectomy in Patients With Obstructive/Restrictive Lung Disease: A Randomized Controlled Study

Patients with respiratory disease have an increased risk of developing complications perioperatively. The use of regional anesthesia decreases this risk with better postoperative outcome. The aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of thoracic spinal versus thoracic epidural anesthesia for open nephrectomy in patients with obstructive/restrictive lung disease.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Kasr Al-Ainy Hospital, Cairo University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA class II or III
  • Mild to moderate obstructive or restrictive lung disease
  • Open nephrectomy candidate patients

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any condition contra-indicating regional anesthesia
  • Allergic to any of the drugs used during the procedure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: TSA group
Thoracic Spinal Anesthesia; Bupivacaine 0.5% (hyperbaric) 7.5mg, Fentanyl 25 µg & Dexmedetomidine 5 µg by intrathecal injection

Spinal anesthesia will be performed for patients of the TSA group at the T7-T8 intervertebral space, using a 27 G pencil point needle with an introducer (Braun Melsungen, Melsungen, Germany).

When correct placement is confirmed by the free flow of clear CSF, 1.5 ml of hyperbaric Bupivacaine 0.5% (7.5 mg) in addition to 0.5 ml Fentanyl (25 μg) & 5 μg dexmedetomidine will be injected.

Neuro-axially injected
Other Names:
  • Heavy Marcaine
Neuro-axially injected
Neuro-axially injected
Active Comparator: TEA group
Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia; Bupivacaine 0.5% (isobaric) 25-50 mg & Fentanyl 10-20 µg by epidural injection
Neuro-axially injected

Epidural anesthesia will be performed for patients of the TEA group at the T7-T8 intervertebral space, using the "Prefix Custom Epidural Anesthesia Tray" with an 18 G Tuohy epidural needle & a 20 G epidural catheter.

Patients will initially receive 5-10 ml of a mixed preparation of 0.5% isobaric Bupivacaine with 2 μg Fentanyl per ml volume as a bolus dose via the epidural catheter, this will be followed by a continuous infusion of 5-10 ml/hr started 1 hour after the bolus dose & continued throughout the procedure.

Neuro-axially injected
Other Names:
  • Marcaine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Satisfaction Score
Time Frame: 24 hours
Patient Satisfaction Score defines the degree of patient satisfaction with the anesthetic experience and is assessed after recovery. It is graded as excellent "E" (best score), fair "F" & poor "P" (worst score).
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VAS
Time Frame: 12 hours
Visual Analogue Score for pain graded from 0-10 [0: no pain, 10: worst pain].
12 hours
Mean ABP
Time Frame: 12 hours
Change in Mean Arterial Blood Pressure measured in mmHg.
12 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Ahmed M El-Badawy, MD, Kasr Al-Ainy Hospital, Cairo University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 18, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

October 27, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 23, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Diseases

Clinical Trials on Thoracic Spinal Anesthesia

3
Subscribe