MANual vs. automatIC Local Activation Time Annotation for Guiding Premature Ventricular Complex Ablation (MANIaC-PVC)

October 17, 2020 updated by: Antonio Berruezo, MD, PhD, Centro Medico Teknon

MANual vs. automatIC Local Activation Time Annotation for Guiding Premature Ventricular Complex Ablation Procedures (MANIaC-PVC Study). A Randomized, Multicenter Study

Current navigation systems incorporate algorithms for automatic identification of local activation time (LAT). However, data about their utility and accuracy in premature ventricular complex (PVC) ablation procedures are scarce. This prospective, randomized study analyzes the accuracy and effectivity of an algorithmic method based on automatic annotation of the maximal negative slope of the unipolar electrogram within the window demarcated by the bipolar electrogram, compared with conventional, manual annotation during PVC ablation procedures.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled and international multicenter study. The investigators aim to analyze the accuracy of LAT annotation using a novel algorithmic method (Wavefront, CARTO, Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, California, USA) (WF), based on automatic annotation of the maximal negative slope of the unipolar electrogram (U-EGM) within the window demarcated by the B-EGM, by comparison with conventional, manual annotation in a multicenter cohort of patients referred for PVC ablation. Further on, the automatic annotation of LAT will be aided by an ECG recognition pattern algorithm (included in the last version of CARTO), which is intended to avoid wrong annotation of ventricular complexes other than the clinical PVC. The investigators hypothesize that automatic LAT annotation (using WF and the ECG recognition algorithm) could be superior to conventional, manual annotation in terms of mapping success and could reduce both procedure time and radiofrequency time.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Barcelona, Spain, 08022
        • Antonio Berruezo, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years.
  • Indication for PVC ablation.
  • Signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18 years.
  • Pregnancy.
  • PVC ablation procedures guided by pace-mapping (PASO® module); eg. low burden of PVCs during the study, mechanical impact during activation mapping.
  • Impossibility to perform activation mapping with the required density of points in the region of interest (see section 4.5.3).
  • Concomitant investigation treatments.
  • Medical, geographical and social factors that make study participation impractical, and inability to give written informed consent. Patient's refusal to participate in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Automatic annotation of LAT (WF-method)
The annotation of LAT in each acquired point will be automatically performed using the LAT annotation tool integrated into CARTO navigation system, called Wavefront (WF). Automatic annotation of LAT performed by the CARTO system uses the maximum negative slope of the distal U-EGM to set the timing of the mapping annotation, displayed on the corresponding B-EGM. Additionally, the automatic annotation of LAT will be aided by an ECG recognition pattern algorithm (included in the last version of CARTO), which is intended to avoid wrong annotation of ventricular complexes other than the clinical PVC.
Automatic annotation of LAT during PVC activation mapping. Acquisition of points will be automatically performed using the Wavefront (WF) annotation tool integrated into CARTO navigation system.
Other Names:
  • Wavefront
Active Comparator: Manual annotation of LAT (M-method)
A detailed electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated activation map of the chamber of interest will be acquired using the CARTO navigation system. An experienced electrophysiologist will perform the annotation of LAT in each acquired point. The LAT will be measured from the onset of B-EGM (earliest positive or negative deflection) of the distal dipole of the mapping catheter to the defined reference. The use of the U-EGM as a guidance to identify the real onset of B-EGM will be decided under electrophysiologist criteria.
Conventional, manual annotation of LAT during PVC activation mapping. Acquisition of points will be performed using the CARTO navigation system by an expert electrophysiologist.
Other Names:
  • Manual

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rates of mapping success, using the assigned mapping approach (automatic vs. manual), as defined in description
Time Frame: 12 months
Mapping success will be defined as complete PVC abolition after RF applications at the earliest activation site (EAS) identified using the assigned mapping approach. A maximum of 2 RF applications with appropriate parameters (contact force, impedance drop, catheter stability) during a maximum of 45 seconds will be allowed. If the PVC is not abolished after 2 RF applications with appropriate parameters, mapping will not be considered successful.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mapping time
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Number of mapped chambers
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Accuracy of a proposed algorithm for selection of first chamber to map
Time Frame: 12 months
In the case of PVCs arising from ventricular outflow tracts, we propose an algorithm to avoid subjective criteria, and to deal with eventual wrong selection of the first mapped chamber, leading to unnecessary RF applications. This algorithm involves a step-by-step analysis of the PVC-ECG morphology: precordial R/S transition and presence of one or more of the following clinical items, which have been previously related with a left origin: male gender, hypertension, or age > 50 years.
12 months
Number of target points
Time Frame: 12 months
Target point is defined as any suspected PVC-site of origin where RF is delivered according to mapping data. Therefore, for one case there can be found a single target point with multiple RF applications, or multiple target points with one single RF application. The maximum distance between 2 RF applications to be considered at the same target point will be defined as 5 mm (equivalent to a 1-cm2 area).
12 months
Radiofrequency (RF) time
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Number of RF applications
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Acute procedure success
Time Frame: 12 months
Complete elimination of the PVC at the end of the procedure.
12 months
Clinical success
Time Frame: 1 month
Reduction of, at least, 80% in the 24-hour PVC burden 1 month after the procedure.
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Antonio Berruezo, MD, PhD, Centro Médico Teknon
  • Principal Investigator: Felipe Bisbal, MD, PhD, Hospital Universitari German Trias i Pujol (Badalona, Spain)
  • Principal Investigator: Alonso Pedrote, MD, PhD, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital (Sevilla, Spain)
  • Principal Investigator: Diego Penela, MD, PhD, Ospedale Guglielmo da Saliceto (Piacenza, Italy)
  • Principal Investigator: Juan Fernández-Armenta, MD, PhD, Puerta del Mar University Hospital (Cadiz, Spain)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 26, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ventricular Premature Complexes

3
Subscribe