Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Treatment for Obsessive Compulsive Disease

December 31, 2021 updated by: Chunyan Zhu, Anhui Medical University

Study of Brain Network Mechanism for Individualized Accurate Target Positioning rTMS Treatment on Obsessive Compulsive Disorder

To investigate the treatment effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on Obsessive-compulsive disorder, and the underlying neural mechanism by functional MRI.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

All patients underwent a medical evaluation that included physical examination and routine laboratory studies before and after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment. Patients were randomly allocated to rTMS group and the sham group. There are about 30 patients in each group. For the first 30 patients, allocation was by coin toss. For the subsequent 30 patients, allocation was according to computer generated random numbers. The decision to enroll a patient was always made prior to randomization. Patients were studied using a double-blind design. Study participants, clinical raters, and all personnel responsible for the clinical care of the patient remained masked to allocated condition and allocation parameters. Only rTMS administrators had access to the randomization list; they had minimal contact with the patients, and no role in assessing the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale(Y-BOCS). Each patient would be treated for continuous 15 days by rTMS.

Before the rTMS treatment, Y-BOCS, Padua Inventory-Washington State University Revision(PI-WSUR), Hamilton Depression Scale(HAMD-17) and Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA-14) were obtained by a trained investigator to assess baseline severity of and other symptoms. The patients had receiving a battery measure of neuropsychological tests (standardized tests to investigate their cognitive problems, anxiety and depressive symptoms in daily life), magnetic resonance imaging scan in multimodalities, electroencephalography (EEG), event-related potentials during stop signal test and task switch paradigm record.

After the last treatment, Y-BOCS, PI-WSUR, HAMD-17 and HAMA-14 were obtained, as well as the Global Index of Safety to assess adverse events of the treatment. Patients were instructed to focus their answers on the past 15 days. The patients had also receiving a battery measure of neuropsychological tests, magnetic resonance imaging scan in multimodalities, and EEG record.

A month after the last treatment, participants were interviewed to obtain the Y-BOCS, PI-WSUR, HAMD-17 and HAMA-14. They were instructed to focus their answers on the past week. Additionally, they were also asked to assess the battery of neuropsychological tests, and have magnetic resonance imaging scan in multimodalities, and EEG record. Afterwards, they were unblinded by the study coordinator.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

37

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Anhui
      • Hefei, Anhui, China, 230032
        • Anhui Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients met diagnostic criteria for obsessive-compulsive disorder using The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5),confirmed by two clinical psychiatrist.

Y-BOCS total severity scores ≥16(Simple forced obsessions or compulsions ≥ 10),HAMA-14 scores < 14,HAMD-17 scores < 17; Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices(SPM) up to normal levels.

After more than one anti-OCD drugs treatment for 8-10 weeks, no significant improvement in symptoms.

Voluntarily participated and cooperated with the experiment.

Exclusion Criteria:

- History of significant head trauma or neurological disorders. Alcohol or drug abuse. Organic brain defects on T1 or T2 images. History of seizures or unexplained loss of consciousness. Family history of medication refractory epilepsy. recent aggression or other forms of behavioral dyscontrol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Real Stimulation
The repetition transcranial magnetic stimulation(rTMS) lasted 30 mins and delivered at 1 Hz with 1s duration, a total of 1800 pulses at 110% of the rest motor threshold (RMT) . MRI dataset should be acquired before the first rTMS session and after the last rTMS session.
TMS with real coil is a noninvasive technique to activate and modify the activity of the neurons
Sham Comparator: Sham Stimulation
The procedure of this protocol was performed by a placebo coil, lasted 30 mins and delivered at 1 Hz with 1s duration, a total of 1800 pulses at 110% of the rest motor threshold (RMT). No actual magnetic stimulation was applied on the head of the volunteers. MRI dataset should be acquired before the first rTMS session and after the last rTMS session.
TMS with sham coil is a placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Symptom improvement assessed by the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale
Time Frame: up to 1 months
The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale is a test to rate the severity of obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms, which measures obsessions separately from compulsions. The scale includes 10 items, the first 5 items are evaluated obsessions, the rest are assessments compulsions. Each item 0-4 points, a total of 40 points. The lower the score, the better the outcome.
up to 1 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stop-Signal Task
Time Frame: pre-treatment; 1 day post-treatment
Stop-Signal Task is a typical paradigm for measuring response inhibition and contains three indicators: Stop-signal reaction time (SSRT), the lower the SSRT value, the better the inhibition of reaction; Go task reaction time (GORT), GoRT is usually used in combination with SSRT to reveal the impaired of response inhibition; Stop-signal delays (SSD), SSD value increases, more difficult to inhibit successfully.
pre-treatment; 1 day post-treatment
Task Switch
Time Frame: pre-treatment; 1 day post-treatment
Task Switch is a paradigm for measuring cognitive flexibility, which involves the ability to unconsciously shift attention between one task and another and contains two indicators: task repeat and task switch.
pre-treatment; 1 day post-treatment
Wisconsin CardSorting Test
Time Frame: pre-treatment; 1 day post-treatment
The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test is a cognitive neuropsychological test, used to determine the abilities of human abstraction, concept formation, working memory and cognitive flexibility. Test measures a total of five indicators: Correct Response, Total Errors, Perseverative Responses, Perseverative Errors and Trials to complete 1st cat.
pre-treatment; 1 day post-treatment
Hanoi Tower
Time Frame: pre-treatment; 1 day post-treatment
Hanoi Tower is a test of planning and problem solving, that contains four indicators: total movement, Latency, 1st move reaction time and total reaction time.
pre-treatment; 1 day post-treatment
Symptom improvement assessed by the Padua Inventory-Washington State University Revision
Time Frame: up to 1 months
The Padua Inventory-Washington State University Revision is a self-rating scale for the severity of symptoms,that contains 5 subscales, 35 items. Each item 0-4 points, a total of 140 points. The lower the score, the better the outcome.
up to 1 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 28, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

January 8, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 4, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 31, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Clinical Trials on transcranial magnetic stimulation with real coil

3
Subscribe