Influence of Sleep Quality in Patients With Periorbicular Hyperchromia

February 11, 2020 updated by: Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre

Influence of Sleep Quality in Patients With Periorbicular Hyperchromia: a Case Control Study

Periorbital hyperchromia (POH) or periorbital hyperpigmentation, commonly known as "dark circles", is a relatively common condition and a frequent reason for dermatological consultation. It is defined as brown-colored pigmentation, ranging from light to dark, which mainly involves the lower eyelids. POH affects individuals over a wide age range, including both sexes and all ethnicities, and is associated with a tired and aged facial appearance. The most commonly affected people are those with the highest skin phototypes. Although the prevalence is similar between sexes and age groups, POH is a more frequent complaint in women. The dark circles characteristic of POH can negatively impact patients' quality of life, although it is not a condition associated with morbidity. Popularly it is believed that the poor quality of sleep is a factor responsible for its appearance, but there is no consistent data in the literature that prove this.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

We aim to compare the quality of sleep through the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI-BR) already translated and validated in Portuguese for patients with periorbicular hyperchromia (cases) with patients without this complaint (controls) and to compare dermatological quality of life through the Quality of Life in Dermatology Index (DLQI) already translated and validated for Portuguese patients with periorbicular hyperchromia (cases) with patients without this complaint (controls). Patients and / or family members who consult in the Dermatology of the Hospital de Clínicas of Porto Alegre (preferably), but also other patients and / or relatives with outpatient care in this institution will be invited to participate in the control group.

The WinPepi program, version 11.32, was used to calculate the sample size. This objective predicts a Pareto Control Case study by age, with a ratio of 1: 1. The sample size was 252 subjects, 126 cases and 126 controls. Adding 10% to possible losses and refusals the sample size should be 280 subjects, with 140 cases and 140 controls. This value was stipulated taking into account the mean of 5.9 in the PSQI-BR of the cases already collected (n = 148 subjects) and corresponds to a difference of almost 3 points in the index ranging from zero to 21, corresponding to approximately 15% difference between groups. For this calculation was considered 80% power and significance level of 5%.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

302

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Rio Grande Do Sul
      • Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil, 90035-003
        • Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Men and women over 18 years of age who agree to answer to quality of sleep and quality of life questionnaires. The "case" group should present periorbicular hyperchromia confirmed by physical examination and the group called "control" should not present periorbicular hyperchromia excluded by physical examination.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Cases: Patients with periocular hyperchromia diagnosed by clinical examination.
  • Controls: Patients without periocular hyperchromia diagnosed by clinical examination.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant patients
  • Active collagenase patients
  • Patients with bacterial or viral infections on the periorbicular area
  • Patients undergoing any treatment modality for periocular hyperpigmentation in the last 3 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Cases: patients with dark circles
Patients who believe they have periorbicular hyperchromia and have a confirmatory physical examination performed by a dermatologist.
Controls: patients without dark circles
Patients who believe that they do not have periorbicular hyperchromia under their eyes and have physical examination that excludes dark circles carried out by a dermatologist.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Time Frame: at 1 day visit 1
To evaluate the sleep quality in patients with periocular hyperpigmentation comparing with patients without periocular hyperpigmentation. The questionnaire consists of 19 questions, which are grouped into 7 components, with values distributed on a scale of zero to 3. These components are subjective quality of sleep, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency , sleep disorders, use of sleeping pills, and daytime dysfunction. The scores of these components are summed to form a global score, ranging from zero to 21. The higher the score, the worse the quality of sleep. A PSQI score> 5 indicates that the individual is experiencing major difficulties in at least 2 components, or moderate difficulties in more than 3 components.
at 1 day visit 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life Index in Dermatology
Time Frame: at 1 day visit 1
To evaluate the impact of periocular hyperpigmentation on patients' dermatological quality of life comparing with patients without periocular hyperpigmentation. this is a score used to evaluate the damage caused by dermatological diseases. It consists of 10 questions, with four alternative answers, corresponding to scores from 0 to 3. The maximum score is 30 and the minimum is zero, with 30 being the highest loss in the dermatological quality of life.
at 1 day visit 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 10, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

February 10, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 3, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 8, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 12, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 150402

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Periorbital Disorder

3
Subscribe