Oral Omadacycline vs. Oral Nitrofurantoin for the Treatment of Cystitis

June 5, 2020 updated by: Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc

A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Adaptive Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Oral Omadacycline and Oral Nitrofurantoin in the Treatment of Female Adults With Cystitis

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral omadacycline as compared to oral nitrofurantoin in the treatment of female adults with cystitis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Participants were randomized to receive 7 days of treatment of either omadacycline or nitrofurantoin. The End of Treatment visit, Post Therapy Evaluation visit, and Final Follow-up visit was planned within 2 days following the last dose of study drug, on Day 14 (+/- 2 days) after the first dose of study drug, and within 30 to 37 days following the first dose of study drug, respectively. The study followed a double-dummy design. To maintain the study blinding, participants assigned to omadacycline received active omadacycline tablets and over-encapsulated nitrofurantoin placebo tablets. Participants assigned to the nitrofurantoin arm received omadacycline placebo tablets and over-encapsulated active nitrofurantoin capsules.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

225

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Chula Vista, California, United States, 91911
        • Site 106
      • La Mesa, California, United States, 91942
        • Site 101
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90017
        • Site 109
    • Florida
      • Aventura, Florida, United States, 33180
        • Site 114
      • DeLand, Florida, United States, 32720
        • Site 102
      • Hialeah, Florida, United States, 33015
        • Site 103
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32256
        • Site 125
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33126
        • Site 121
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33126
        • Site 130
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33134
        • Site 115
      • Miami Springs, Florida, United States, 33166
        • Site 127
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 82306
        • Site 126
    • Kansas
      • Newton, Kansas, United States, 67114
        • Site 113
      • Wichita, Kansas, United States, 67207
        • Site 110
    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68144
        • Site 112
    • Nevada
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89106
        • Site 132
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89109
        • Site 108
    • New Jersey
      • Berlin, New Jersey, United States, 08009
        • Site 122
    • North Carolina
      • Raleigh, North Carolina, United States, 27612
        • Site 118
    • Tennessee
      • Jackson, Tennessee, United States, 38305
        • Site 104
      • Smyrna, Tennessee, United States, 37167
        • Site 105
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77061
        • Site 131
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • Site 120

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female participants, age 18 or older who have signed the informed consent form
  • Must have a qualifying uncomplicated urinary tract infection
  • Participants must not be pregnant at the time of enrollment
  • Must agree to a reliable method of birth control during the study and for 30 days following the last dose of study drug

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Males
  • Evidence of complicated urinary tract infection (UTI), upper UTI, vaginitis, or sexually transmitted infection
  • Evidence of significant immunological disease
  • Has received an investigational drug within the past 30 days
  • Participants who are pregnant or nursing

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Omadacycline 300/300 once every 24 hours
Participants received omadacycline 300 milligrams orally, once every 12 hours, fed on Day 1 and omadacycline 300 milligrams orally, once every 24 hours on Days 2 through 7. Odd doses on Days 2 to 7 were administered in a fasted state. Even doses on Days 2 to 7 were administered approximately 2 hours following a light meal.
Oral Omadacycline
Experimental: Omadacycline 450/300 once every 24 hours
Participants received omadacycline 450 milligrams orally, once every 12 hours, fed on Day 1 and omadacycline 300 milligrams orally, once every 24 hours on Days 2 through 7. Odd doses on Days 2 to 7 were administered in a fasted state. Even doses on Days 2 to 7 were administered approximately 2 hours following a light meal.
Oral Omadacycline
Experimental: Omadacycline 450/450 once every 24 hours
Participants received omadacycline 450 milligrams orally, once every 12 hours, fed on Day 1 and omadacycline 450 milligrams orally, once every 24 hours on Days 2 through 7. Odd doses on Days 2 to 7 were administered in a fasted state. Even doses on Days 2 to 7 were administered approximately 2 hours following a light meal.
Oral Omadacycline
Experimental: Omadacycline 450/450 once every 12 hours
Participants received omadacycline 450 milligrams orally, once every 12 hours, fed on Day 1 and omadacycline 450 milligrams orally, once every 12 hours on Days 2 through 7. Odd doses on Days 2 to 7 were administered in a fasted state. Even doses on Days 2 to 7 were administered approximately 2 hours following a light meal.
Oral Omadacycline
Active Comparator: Nitrofurantoin 100/100 once every 12 hours
Participants received nitrofurantoin 100 milligrams orally, once every 12 hours, fed on Day 1 and nitrofurantoin 100 milligrams orally, once every 12 hours on Days 2 through 7. Odd doses on Days 2 to 7 were administered in a fasted state. Even doses on Days 2 to 7 were administered approximately 2 hours following a light meal.
Oral Nitrofurantoin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) Visit (ITT Population)
Time Frame: Day 14 (A PTE occurred on Day 14 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug)
Clinical response was determined by the investigator at the PTE visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the clinical outcome of Clinical Success, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate. Clinical Success was defined as sufficient resolution of cystitis signs and symptoms at the PTE visit such that no additional systemic antimicrobial therapy was required for the current infection. Clinical Failure was defined as no apparent response to therapy or persistence of signs and symptoms of infection or reappearance of signs and symptoms at or before the PTE visit such that use of additional systemic antimicrobial therapy for the current infection was required. The clinical outcome was deemed as Indeterminate when the PTE visit was not completed.
Day 14 (A PTE occurred on Day 14 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit (ITT Population)
Time Frame: EOT visit (within 1 to 2 days following the last dose of study drug i.e. up to approximately 9 days)
Clinical response was determined by the investigator at the EOT visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the clinical outcome of Clinical Success, Clinical Failure. Clinical Success was defined as sufficient resolution of cystitis signs and symptoms at the EOT visit such that no additional systemic antimicrobial therapy was required for the current infection. Clinical Failure was defined as no apparent response to therapy or persistence of signs and symptoms of infection at the EOT visit such that use of additional systemic antimicrobial therapy for the current infection was required. The clinical outcome was deemed as Indeterminate when the EOT visit was not completed.
EOT visit (within 1 to 2 days following the last dose of study drug i.e. up to approximately 9 days)
Number of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the EOT Visit (Microbiological [Micro]-ITT Population)
Time Frame: EOT visit (within 1 to 2 days following the last dose of study drug i.e. up to approximately 9 days)
Clinical response was determined by the investigator at the EOT visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the clinical outcome of Clinical Success, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate. Clinical Success was defined as sufficient resolution of cystitis signs and symptoms at the EOT visit such that no additional systemic antimicrobial therapy was required for the current infection. Clinical Failure was defined as no apparent response to therapy or persistence of signs and symptoms of infection at the EOT visit such that use of additional systemic antimicrobial therapy for the current infection was required. The clinical outcome was deemed as Indeterminate when the EOT visit was not completed.
EOT visit (within 1 to 2 days following the last dose of study drug i.e. up to approximately 9 days)
Number of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the EOT Visit (CE-EOT Population)
Time Frame: EOT visit (within 1 to 2 days following the last dose of study drug i.e. up to approximately 9 days)
Clinical response was determined by the investigator at the EOT visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the clinical outcome of Clinical Success or Clinical Failure. Clinical Success was defined as sufficient resolution of cystitis signs and symptoms at the EOT visit such that no additional systemic antimicrobial therapy was required for the current infection. Clinical Failure was defined as no apparent response to therapy or persistence of signs and symptoms of infection at the EOT visit such that use of additional systemic antimicrobial therapy for the current infection was required. For the CE population, the clinical outcome was not deemed as indeterminate response.
EOT visit (within 1 to 2 days following the last dose of study drug i.e. up to approximately 9 days)
Number of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the PTE Visit (CE-PTE Population)
Time Frame: Day 14 (A PTE occurred on Day 14 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug)
Clinical response was determined by the investigator at the PTE visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the clinical outcome of Clinical Success or Clinical Failure. Clinical Success was defined as sufficient resolution of cystitis signs and symptoms at the PTE visit such that no additional systemic antimicrobial therapy was required for the current infection. Clinical Failure was defined as no apparent response to therapy or persistence of signs and symptoms of infection or reappearance of signs and symptoms at or before the PTE visit such that use of additional systemic antimicrobial therapy for the current infection was required. For the CE population, the clinical outcome was not deemed as indeterminate response.
Day 14 (A PTE occurred on Day 14 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug)
Number of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the PTE Visit (Micro-ITT Population)
Time Frame: Day 14 (A PTE occurred on Day 14 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug)
Clinical response was determined by the investigator at the PTE visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the clinical outcome of Clinical Success, Clinical Failure or indeterminate. Clinical Success was defined as sufficient resolution of cystitis signs and symptoms at the PTE visit such that no additional systemic antimicrobial therapy was required for the current infection. Clinical Failure was defined as no apparent response to therapy or persistence of signs and symptoms of infection or reappearance of signs and symptoms at or before the PTE visit such that use of additional systemic antimicrobial therapy for the current infection was required. The clinical outcome was deemed as Indeterminate when the PTE visit was not completed.
Day 14 (A PTE occurred on Day 14 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug)
Number of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the Final Follow-up (FFU) Visit (ITT Population)
Time Frame: FFU visit (A FFU occurred 30 to 37 days following the first dose of study drug)
Clinical response was determined by the investigator at the FFU visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the clinical outcome of Clinical Success, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate. Clinical Success was defined as sufficient resolution of cystitis signs and symptoms at the FFU visit such that no additional systemic antimicrobial therapy was required for the current infection. Clinical Failure was defined as no apparent response to therapy or persistence of signs and symptoms of infection at the FFU visit such that use of additional systemic antimicrobial therapy for the current infection was required. The clinical outcome was deemed as Indeterminate when the FFU visit was not completed
FFU visit (A FFU occurred 30 to 37 days following the first dose of study drug)
Number of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the FFU Visit (CE-FFU Population)
Time Frame: FFU visit (A FFU occurred 30 to 37 days following the first dose of study drug)
Clinical response was determined by the investigator at the FFU visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the clinical outcome of Clinical Success or Clinical Failure. Clinical Success was defined as sufficient resolution of cystitis signs and symptoms at the FFU visit such that no additional systemic antimicrobial therapy was required for the current infection. Clinical Failure was defined as no apparent response to therapy or persistence of signs and symptoms of infection at the FFU visit such that use of additional systemic antimicrobial therapy for the current infection was required. For the CE population, the clinical outcome was not deemed as indeterminate response.
FFU visit (A FFU occurred 30 to 37 days following the first dose of study drug)
Number of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the FFU Visit (Micro-ITT Population)
Time Frame: FFU visit (A FFU occurred 30 to 37 days following the first dose of study drug)
Clinical response was determined by the investigator at the FFU visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the clinical outcome of Clinical Success, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate. Clinical Success was defined as sufficient resolution of cystitis signs and symptoms at the FFU visit such that no additional systemic antimicrobial therapy was required for the current infection. Clinical Failure was defined as no apparent response to therapy or persistence of signs and symptoms of infection at the FFU visit such that use of additional systemic antimicrobial therapy for the current infection was required. The clinical outcome was deemed as Indeterminate when the FFU visit was not completed.
FFU visit (A FFU occurred 30 to 37 days following the first dose of study drug)
Number of Participants With a Microbiological Response at the EOT Visit (Micro-ITT Population)
Time Frame: EOT visit (within 1 to 2 days following the last dose of study drug i.e. up to approximately 9 days)
Microbiological response was determined programmatically at the EOT visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the microbiological outcome of Favorable, Unfavorable, or Indeterminate. Favorable microbiological outcomes included eradication and presumed eradication i.e., urine specimen showed absence of the original baseline pathogen or the baseline pathogen grew at <10^4 CFU/mL at visit. Unfavorable microbiological outcome included persistence i.e. urine culture showed continued presence (defined as ≥10^4 CFU/mL) of the original baseline pathogen(s) at visit. The microbiological outcome was deemed as Indeterminate when the urine specimen was not available to culture or the culture result was not interpretable.
EOT visit (within 1 to 2 days following the last dose of study drug i.e. up to approximately 9 days)
Number of Participants With a Microbiological Response at the EOT Visit (ME-EOT Population)
Time Frame: EOT visit (within 1 to 2 days following the last dose of study drug i.e. up to approximately 9 days)
Microbiological response was determined programmatically at the EOT visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the microbiological outcome of Favorable or Unfavorable. Favorable microbiological outcomes included eradication and presumed eradication i.e., urine specimen showed absence of the original baseline pathogen or the baseline pathogen grew at <10^4 CFU/mL at visit. Unfavorable microbiological outcome included persistence i.e. urine culture showed continued presence (defined as ≥10^4 CFU/mL) of the original baseline pathogen(s) at visit. For the ME population, the microbiological outcome was not deemed as indeterminate response.
EOT visit (within 1 to 2 days following the last dose of study drug i.e. up to approximately 9 days)
Number of Participants With a Microbiological Response at the PTE Visit (Micro-ITT Population)
Time Frame: Day 14 (A PTE occurred on Day 14 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug)
Microbiological response was determined programmatically at the PTE visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the microbiological outcome of Favorable, Unfavorable, or Indeterminate. Favorable microbiological outcomes included eradication and presumed eradication i.e., urine specimen showed absence of the original baseline pathogen or the baseline pathogen grew at <10^4 CFU/mL at visit. Unfavorable microbiological outcome included persistence i.e. urine culture showed continued presence (defined as ≥10^4 CFU/mL) of the original baseline pathogen(s) at visit. The microbiological outcome was deemed as Indeterminate when the urine specimen was not available to culture or the culture result was not interpretable.
Day 14 (A PTE occurred on Day 14 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug)
Number of Participants With a Microbiological Response at the PTE Visit (ME-PTE Population)
Time Frame: Day 14 (A PTE occurred on Day 14 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug)
Microbiological response was determined programmatically at the PTE visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the microbiological outcome of Favorable or Unfavorable. Favorable microbiological outcomes included eradication and presumed eradication i.e., urine specimen showed absence of the original baseline pathogen or the baseline pathogen grew at <10^4 CFU/mL at visit. Unfavorable microbiological outcome included persistence i.e. urine culture showed continued presence (defined as ≥10^4 CFU/mL) of the original baseline pathogen(s) at visit. For the ME population, the microbiological outcome was not deemed as indeterminate response.
Day 14 (A PTE occurred on Day 14 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Resolution of All Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) Signs and Clinical Symptoms at PTE Visit (ITT Population)
Time Frame: Day 14 (A PTE occurred on Day 14 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug)
Participants recorded their assessments using the UTI Symptoms Assessment (UTISA) questionnaire, a 14-item questionnaire that assessed the levels of 'severity' and 'bothersomeness' for seven UTI signs and symptoms: Frequency, Urgency, Pain/burning on urination, Incomplete voiding, Pain in pelvic area, Low back pain, and Blood in urine. The sub-scale responses were recorded as 'did not have', 'mild', 'moderate', and 'severe' for 'severity'; and 'not at all', 'a little', 'moderately', and 'a lot' for 'bothersomeness', both scored 0-3. Total scores were calculated by summing the non-missing scores of the 7 items, divided by the number of non-missing items, and then multiplied by 7. For each sub-scale, the total score ranged from 0 (least Severe/ least bothersome) and 21 (worst severity/most bothersome). Number of participants with resolution of all symptoms, without occurrence of new symptoms is reported. Resolution was defined as absence of all baseline symptoms.
Day 14 (A PTE occurred on Day 14 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug)
Number of Participants With No Worsening and Absence of New UTI Signs and Clinical Symptoms at PTE Visit (ITT Population)
Time Frame: Day 14 (A PTE occurred on Day 14 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug)
Participants recorded their assessments using the UTI Symptoms Assessment (UTISA) questionnaire, a 14-item questionnaire that assessed the levels of 'severity' and 'bothersomeness' for seven UTI signs and symptoms: Frequency, Urgency, Pain/burning on urination, Incomplete voiding, Pain in pelvic area, Low back pain, and Blood in urine. The sub-scale responses were recorded as 'did not have', 'mild', 'moderate', and 'severe' for 'severity'; and 'not at all', 'a little', 'moderately', and 'a lot' for 'bothersomeness', both scored 0-3. Total scores were calculated by summing the non-missing scores of the 7 items, divided by the number of non-missing items, and then multiplied by 7. For each sub-scale, the total score ranged from 0 (least Severe/ least bothersome) and 21 (worst severity/most bothersome). Number of participants with no worsening and absence of new UTI signs and clinical symptoms is reported. No worsening meant that each question score is same or better at post baseline.
Day 14 (A PTE occurred on Day 14 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 4, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 15, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

June 5, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 28, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

February 7, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cystitis

Clinical Trials on Omadacycline tablets

3
Subscribe