- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03438136
Adult Broad Learning Experiment (ABLE): Feasibility Study (ABLE)
February 15, 2018 updated by: Rachel Wu, University of California, Riverside
This study evaluates the feasibility of enrolling and retaining older adults in a 15-week intervention that will implement six factors from early childhood experiences: individualized scaffolding (having a responsive teacher), forgiving environment (allowing the learner to make and learn from mistakes), growth mindset (believing that abilities can develop with effort), open-minded learning (exploring new experiences), serious commitment to learning (adopting a "learning" lifestyle), and learning multiple skills simultaneously.
These six factors will be implemented via concurrent classes at the UCR Extension center (OSHER Lifelong Learning Institute).
Study Overview
Status
Unknown
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
22
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Riverside, California, United States, 92521
- University of California, Riverside
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
55 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 55 years of age or older
- Fluent in English
- Have not been diagnosed with a cognitive condition (e.g., Mild Cognitive Impairment, Alzheimer's, and Dementia)
- Currently not experiencing a mental health disorder (e.g., anxiety, depression, Schizophrenia)
- Have normal eye vision or corrected-to-normal eye vision
- Not proficient in any of the three skills that will be taught during the intervention. Proficiency of skills will be determined by participants' self-report of their experience with each skill. Only potential participants who self-report having less than one or more years of experience with any of the three skills in the past 10 years or as having less than 5 years of experience more than 50 years ago will be considered as being "unfamiliar" with that skill (or skills) and will be qualified to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria: n/a
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Intervention arm
This arm will be enrolled in the intervention.
|
This intervention implements six factors from early childhood experiences: individualized scaffolding (having a responsive teacher), forgiving environment (allowing the learner to make and learn from mistakes), growth mindset (believing that abilities can develop with effort), open-minded learning (exploring new experiences), serious commitment to learning (adopting a "learning" lifestyle), and learning multiple skills simultaneously.
|
No Intervention: No intervention arm
This arm will be enrolled in a no contact control group.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Screening-to-enrollment ratio
Time Frame: Beginning of the intervention (Week 1)
|
Number of participants we screen relative to the number of participants who enroll
|
Beginning of the intervention (Week 1)
|
Intervention adherence
Time Frame: Throughout the intervention (15 weeks)
|
Amount of homework hours logged and class attendance
|
Throughout the intervention (15 weeks)
|
Enjoyment of intervention activities
Time Frame: Week 15
|
Assessed via a brief questionnaire of 4 questions created by our research team.
Range: 4-24, summed across 4 questions.
|
Week 15
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Executive Function
Time Frame: Pre-test to post-test (15 weeks: Week 1; Week 15)
|
Measured by NIH EXAMINER battery
|
Pre-test to post-test (15 weeks: Week 1; Week 15)
|
Broad Learning Adult Questionnaire
Time Frame: Pre-test to post-test (15 weeks: Week 1; Week 15)
|
New questionnaire developed by PI
|
Pre-test to post-test (15 weeks: Week 1; Week 15)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
December 5, 2017
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
December 13, 2018
Study Completion (Anticipated)
December 13, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 28, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 15, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
February 19, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
February 19, 2018
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 15, 2018
Last Verified
February 1, 2018
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1320181
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cognitive Decline
-
Jean-François DémonetUniversity of Lausanne HospitalsActive, not recruitingCognitive Performance | Functional Capacity | Subjective Cognitive Decline | Age-related Cognitive DeclineSwitzerland
-
Rotman Research Institute at BaycrestSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; University of Waterloo; Toronto Rehabilitation... and other collaboratorsTerminatedSubjective Cognitive Decline | Age-Related Cognitive DeclineCanada
-
National Taiwan University HospitalNational Taiwan Science Education Center(NTSEC)RecruitingCognitive Training | Subjective Cognitive DeclineTaiwan
-
Sahmyook UniversityCompletedCognition Disorders in Old Age | Subjective Memory Decline | Cognitive Decline, MildKorea, Republic of
-
University of Milano BicoccaRecruitingMild Cognitive Impairment | Subjective Cognitive DeclineItaly
-
Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese MedicineUnknownSubjective Cognitive Decline | Subjective Cognitive ComplaintChina
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterRecruiting
-
IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio FatebenefratelliUniversity of ChietiCompletedSubjective Cognitive DeclineItaly
-
National Cheng Kung UniversityUnknownEffects of Cognitive Strategy Training on Daily Function in People With Subjective Cognitive DeclineSubjective Cognitive DeclineTaiwan
-
University Hospital TuebingenCompletedSubjective Cognitive DeclineGermany
Clinical Trials on Adult Broad Learning Experiment (ABLE)
-
University of PennsylvaniaRecruiting
-
UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital OaklandNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)CompletedAnemia, Sickle CellUnited States