Inhaler Technique in Elderly Patients: Impact on Disease Exacerbations

February 22, 2018 updated by: Tiago Maricoto, Aveiro-Aradas Family Health Unit

Inhaler Technique Education in Elderly Patients With Asthma or COPD: Impact on Disease Exacerbations - a Protocol for a Single-blinded Randomised Controlled Trial

Introduction COPD and Asthma affect more than 10% of the population. Most patients use their inhaler incorrectly, mainly the elderly, thereby becoming more susceptible to poor clinical control and exacerbations. Placebo device training is regarded as one of the best teaching methods, but there is scarce evidence to support it as the most effective one to improve major clinical outcomes. Our objective is to perform a single-blinded RCT to assess the impact of this education tool in these patients.

Methods and Analysis A multicentre single-blinded RCT will be set, comparing a placebo-device training programme versus usual care, with a one-year follow-up, in elderly patients with Asthma or COPD. Intervention will be provided at baseline, and after 3 and 6 months, with interim analysis at an intermediate time point. Exacerbation rates were set as primary outcomes, and quality of life, adherence rates, clinical control and respiratory function were chosen as secondary outcomes. A sample size of 146 participants (73 in each arm) was estimated as adequate to detect a 50% reduction in event rates. Two-sample proportions Chi-squared test will be used to study primary outcome and subgroup analysis will be carried out according to major baseline characteristics.

Discussion The investigators expect to confirm that inhaler performance education will significantly reduce exacerbation rate and improve clinical and functional control.

Ethics and dissemination:

Every participant will sign a consent form. A Data Safety Monitoring Board will be set up to evaluate data throughout the study and to monitor stop earlier criteria. Identity of all participants will be protected. Results will be presented in scientific meeting and published in peer-reviewed journals.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

146

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years to 130 years (OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a diagnosis of COPD or Asthma, medicated with any kind of inhaler device (pressurized Metered Dose Inhaler (pMDI) with or without Spacer, Dry Powder Inhaler (DPI) or Soft Mist), aged ≥65 years and being a regular user of primary health care services (defined as having at least one consultation performed in the last two years with his/her own Family Doctor). In order to minimize diagnostic inaccuracy, Asthma and COPD diagnosis will be reviewed in every participant at baseline prior to enrolment and according to GINA and GOLD strategies.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe or acute illness (such as unstable cardiovascular status, unstable angina, recent myocardial infarction (within one month) or pulmonary embolism, haemoptysis of unknown origin, recent pneumothorax (within one month), recent thoracic, abdominal or eye surgery (within one month), acute nausea or vomiting, severe respiratory distress, dementia). Patients with intermittent asthma, as well as COPD patients with mild obstruction (GOLD class I) will be excluded, since these patients do not need to take inhaler medication on a daily basis, and tend to have a low frequency of disease exacerbations.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Inhaler technique education
This group will receive a structured and regular follow-up plan, with education on inhaler technique. Patients will be trained by a Family Doctor (the primary investigator) in terms of the inhaler technique using placebo devices similar to their own devices. A teach-to-goal approach will be used, repeating all correct steps as many times as needed in order for patients to perform them correctly at each evaluation. There will be visits at baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months to assess outcomes. In each visit, and prior to the main intervention with the primary investigator, assessment of the inhaler technique and application of all questionnaires (clinical control, treatment adhesion and quality of life) will be performed by a secondary blinded investigator.
Teaching of inhalers use with placebo devices in real training
NO_INTERVENTION: Usual Care

This group will receive usual care from their own Family doctors, with no specific intervention. Each doctor will perform the necessary consultations according to his real life judgment. Besides this, this group will perform visits at baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months to assess secondary outcomes. At each visit, assessment of the inhaler technique and application of all questionnaires (clinical control, treatment adhesion and quality of life) will be performed by a secondary blinded investigator. At any appointment, if the patient asks for or if the clinician decides to teach inhaler technique, that will be recorded.

If any adjustments are made in drug classes or device types in every participants, this information will be recorded.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse events
Time Frame: Evaluation at 12 months.

This outcome will be quantifyed as "time to event"

For Asthma, an event will be defined as increased respiratory clinical symptoms leading the patient to search for medical care, and resulting in any of the following:

  • Need for increased inhaled corticosteroid dose of at least 4x the regular dose
  • Need for increase of short-acting β2 agonists on a daily basis
  • Need for oral corticosteroids
  • Need for oral antibiotics
  • Hospitalization or Emergency Room (ER) visit with increased respiratory clinical symptoms.

For COPD, an event will be defined as increased respiratory clinical symptoms inducing the patient to search for medical care, and resulting in any of the following:

  • Need for increase of long-acting β2 agonists on a daily basis
  • Need for oral corticosteroids
  • Need for oral antibiotics
  • Hospitalization or ER visit with increased respiratory clinical symptoms. Respiratory-related mortality and all-cause mortality will also be considered an adverse event.
Evaluation at 12 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical assessment
Time Frame: Evaluation at 12 months
COPD Assessment Tools (CAT) [scale from 0 (worst) to 40 (best) points]
Evaluation at 12 months
Clinical assessment
Time Frame: Evaluation at 12 months
modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) [scale from 0 (best) to 4 (worst) points]
Evaluation at 12 months
Clinical assessment
Time Frame: Evaluation at 12 months
Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test (CARAT) [scale from 0 (worst) to 30 (best) points]
Evaluation at 12 months
Clinical assessment
Time Frame: Evaluation at 12 months
Asthma Control Test (ACT) [scale from 5 (worst) to 25 (best) points]
Evaluation at 12 months
Quality of Life
Time Frame: Evaluation at 12 months.
Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) [scale from 32 (worst) to 224 (best) points]
Evaluation at 12 months.
Quality of Life
Time Frame: Evaluation at 12 months.
St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire [scale from 0 (best) to 75 (worst) points]
Evaluation at 12 months.
Quality of Life
Time Frame: Evaluation at 12 months.
Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) [scale from 0 (best) to 60 (worst) points]
Evaluation at 12 months.
Functional control
Time Frame: Evaluation at 12 months.
Functional control using FEV1 in liters.
Evaluation at 12 months.
Functional control
Time Frame: Evaluation at 12 months.
Functional control using FVC in liters.
Evaluation at 12 months.
Functional control
Time Frame: Evaluation at 12 months.
Functional control using PEF in liters/sec.
Evaluation at 12 months.
Functional control
Time Frame: Evaluation at 12 months.
Functional control using MEF25-75, in % of predicted values.
Evaluation at 12 months.
Functional control
Time Frame: Evaluation at 12 months.
Functional control using FEV1/FVC ratio.
Evaluation at 12 months.
Adherence rate
Time Frame: Evaluation at 12 months.
Adherence rate using the Brief Medication Questionnaire [scale from 0 (best) to 11 (worst) points]
Evaluation at 12 months.
Inhaler technique performance
Time Frame: Evaluation at 12 months.
Number of errors in inhaler technique (that will be standardized to a score up to 100% scale) [To evaluate inhaler technique performance with each device, the Aerosol Drug Management Improvement Team (ADMIT) protocols and guidelines will be used, evaluating all the recommended steps for inhaler use on each one of them. For those devices that do not have any protocol from the ADMIT group, investigators will use the recommendations from the manufacture's Summary of Product Characteristics.
Evaluation at 12 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

June 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 31, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 28, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 28, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2018

Last Verified

February 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

All data from the trial will be kept in a safe place of the principal investigator's institutional facilities and by the Data Safety Monitoring Board, in accordance with the national and international clinical research policies.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma

Clinical Trials on Inhaler technique education

3
Subscribe