Dissecting De-automatization

September 28, 2018 updated by: Adam Hanley, University of Utah

Dissecting De-automatization: The Effect of Mindfulness Training on Unconscious Habit Formation

The proposed study will assess the effects of mindfulness meditation training on an eye blink conditioning (EBC) task in a sample of novice meditators. This methodology will allow investigation of whether mindfulness interrupts classical conditioning through the process of de-automatization. Implicit learning rates, as reflective of unconscious habit formation and measured by the frequency of conditioned responses during the EBC, will be a main outcome of interest. The proposed study will also assess the effects of mindfulness meditation training on an emotion regulation (ER) task, with a specific focus on reappraisal of negative images and savoring of positive images.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

53

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84112
        • University of Utah

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18-60,
  2. willingness to participate in study interventions and assessments.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior experience with Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction, Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy, or Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention, or a history of meditation practice,
  2. Learning disability, significant memory problems or significant attentional disruptions as determined by self-report,
  3. History of head injury resulting in loss of consciousness.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mindfulness
Participants randomly assigned to the mindfulness meditation condition will meet for five, 15-minute sessions, in which they will receive training in basic mindfulness skills (Wallace, 2006).
A researcher will guide participants through 5 mindfulness meditations, each lasting 11 minutes in length.
Active Comparator: Active Listening
Participants randomly assigned to the active listening condition will meet for five, 15-minute sessions, in which they will listen to Gilbert White's The Natural History of Selborne.
A researcher will read participants 5 selections from The Natural History of Selborne, each lasting 11 minutes in length.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Conditioned Eyeblink Frequency
Time Frame: 9 minutes
Between group differences in the frequency of conditioned eyeblinks over the six reinforcement blocks.
9 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Positive Emotion Regulation Task
Time Frame: 5 minutes
Between group differences in affective change occasioned by savoring positive images will be measured by comparing increases in self-reported positive affect (5-point Likert scale) from pre- to post- positive image, viewing block.
5 minutes
Negative Emotion Regulation Task
Time Frame: 5 minutes
Between group differences in affective change occasioned by positively reappraising negative images will be measured by comparing increases in self-reported negative affect (5-point Likert scale) from pre- to post- negative image, viewing block.
5 minutes
Self-Transcendence (NADA-State)
Time Frame: 2 minutes
Between group differences in the degree to which mindfulness training alters participants' sense of self as measured by the nondaul awareness dimension assessment's (NADA) state form.
2 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 12, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

March 7, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2018

Last Verified

September 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB_00088540

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mindfulness

Clinical Trials on Mindfulness Meditation Training

3
Subscribe