Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Biliary Drainage for Malignant Biliary Obstruction After Failed ERCP ((EUS-BD))

April 26, 2018 updated by: Paolo Cecinato, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS

Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Biliary Drainage for Malignant Biliary Obstruction After Failed ERCP: a Single Italian Center Experience

In this study the investigators retrospectively report outcomes of direct transluminal EUS-BD in a series of patients with malignant biliary obstruction after failed ERCP as the experience of a single Italian center

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

INTRODUCTION Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with placement of biliary stents is the treatment of choice for palliation of malignant obstructive jaundice and has a success rate of 90% with low morbidity rate.1 In 5 to 10% of cases, even in expert hands, stents' placement failed for several reasons as altered anatomy due to surgical intervention, gastric outlet obstruction, ampullary tumors invasion, high grade biliary strictures and all other causes of failed biliary cannulation.

In these unfortunately cases alternative methods have been developed. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTDB) is a efficacy technique but is associated with an adverse events rate of 30% and a negative impact on the quality of life of patients due to the external drainage;4 furthermore surgical biliodigestive anastomosis is burdened by a morbidity and mortality of 30% and 10% respectively.

An effective alternative to PTDB, introduced for the first time in 1996, is endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD). EUS-BD can be performed by four different routes: EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy, choledochoduodenostomy, rendezvous and anterograde transpapillary drainage.

Among these, rendezvous technique seems to be the safest of all EUS-guided procedure at the expense of a not excellent success rate (from 44% to 80%) and with the limit of the need of a accessible papilla by endoscopy.8 These limitations are overcome by direct transluminal EUS-guided approach as hepaticogastrostomy and choledochoduodenostomy that also ensure a 1-stage procedure.

In this study the investigators retrospectively report outcomes of direct transluminal EUS-BD in a series of patients with malignant biliary obstruction after failed ERCP as the experience of a single Italian center.

Definitions:

Technical success was defined as the correct placement of the metal or plastic stent across the stomach or duodenum to the chosen biliary branch, with radiologically and endoscopically confirmed.

Early clinical success was defined as a drop of bilirubin hematic level by 50 % after 2 week from EUS-BD, while late clinical success was considered as the reaching of hematic bilirubin level compatible with a possible chemotherapy treatment at 3-4 weeks after the endoscopic performance.

Procedure-related adverse events were recorded and graded as mild if they resolved spontaneously, moderate if they required a specific intervention without the need for an extension of hospitalization and severe in case of death or if they required a specific intervention (surgical or not) with consequent prolongation of hospitalization.

Stent patency duration was defined as the time between stent placement and its occlusion Re-stenting was defined as the necessary to second EUS-guided stent placement in patients who didn't achieve early clinical success or in the case of jaundice recurrence from the first treatment.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients afferent to Santa Maria Nuova Hospital in Reggio Emilia, between January 2011 and November 2017, with malignant obstructive jaundice, in whom ERCP had failed

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients over 18 years old, malignant bile duct obstruction with unsuccessful ERCP drainage.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with benign stricture

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Technical success
Time Frame: 1 day
the correct placement of the metal or plastic stent across the stomach or duodenum to the chosen biliary branch, with radiologically and endoscopically confirmed.
1 day
Early clinical success
Time Frame: 14 days
drop of bilirubin hematic level by 50 % after 2 week from EUS-BD
14 days
late clinical success
Time Frame: 30 days
as the reaching of hematic bilirubin level compatible with a possible chemotherapy treatment at 3-4 weeks after the endoscopic performance
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procedure-related adverse events
Time Frame: 30 days
graded as mild if they resolved spontaneously, moderate if they required a specific intervention without the need for an extension of hospitalization and severe in case of death or if they required a specific intervention (surgical or not) with consequent prolongation of hospitalization.
30 days
Stent patency
Time Frame: 1 year
the time between stent placement and its occlusion
1 year
Re-stenting
Time Frame: 1 year
the necessary to second EUS-guided stent placement in patients who didn't achieve early clinical success or in the case of jaundice recurrence from the first treatment.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 8, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 6, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2018

Last Verified

April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pancreatic Cancer

Clinical Trials on Eus guided biliary drainage

3
Subscribe