Prospective Randomized Study of PTC and EUS-guided Drainage of the Bile Duct

May 18, 2016 updated by: Institut Paoli-Calmettes

Prospective Randomized Study of PTC and EUS-guided Drainage of the Bile Duct in Patients With Malignant or Post-operative Jaundice After Failure or Impossibility to Perform Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography

At this time, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) stay the gold standard method to achieve biliary drainage in case of malignant or benign stricture. When ERCP fail or if the major papilla is not suitable, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) is the most commonly used alternative, surgery having higher morbidity and mortality rates, unacceptable especially in palliative situation. Recent developments in interventional endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) allow new endoluminal approaches to pancreatic-biliary structures, such as cysto-enterostomy or pancreatic-enterostomy. More recently were described the possibility to realize EUS-guided biliary drainage, through the duodenal or the gastric wall. Advantages of the EUS-guided approach are to be realizable even the papilla is not suitable endoscopically (duodenal stricture or post-surgical status) and to allow if necessary extra-tumoral non anatomic drainage (hepaticogastrostomy). This technique is actually an alternative to PTBD. In comparison of the PTBD, EUS-guided route seems to have less morbidity and to avoid external biliary drainage. Indeed, the morbidity rate of the percutaneous biliary drainage and the EUS-guided biliary drainage range respectively from 25 to 35% and from 0 to 23%. However, none study compare prospectively both techniques. Aims of this study are to compare the morbidity rate, feasibility and efficacy of these techniques.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

65

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Marseille, France, 13009
        • Institut Paoli-Calmettes
      • Marseille, France, 13020
        • Hopital Nord
      • Monaco, Monaco, 98000
        • Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age >= 18
  • Karnofsky >= 50%
  • biliary stenosis (malignant or benign stricture)with failure of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
  • signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • isolated biliary stenosis of right hepatic canal
  • percutaneous biliary drainage < 10 days
  • laparotomy < 10 days
  • contra-indication to the procedure
  • pregnant women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Percutaneous Drainage
Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage (PTBD)
percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD)
EXPERIMENTAL: EUS-guided drainage
endoscopic ultrasonography guided biliary drainage through the duodenal or the gastric wall
endoscopic ultrasonography guided biliary drainage through the duodenal or the gastric wall

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Morbidity rate
Time Frame: 30 days
Morbidity rate during 30 post-operative days
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
efficacy
Time Frame: 15 days
decrease of bilirubine > 50%
15 days
feasibility
Time Frame: up to 3 days
succes or not of the intervention to obtain bilairy drainage
up to 3 days
biliary drainage duration
Time Frame: up to 1 month
time between intervention and drain withdrawal
up to 1 month
quality of life
Time Frame: 30 days
QLQ-C30 questionnary at inclusion and at D30
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Erwan BORIES, MD, Institut Paoli-Calmettes

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 16, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 26, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 19, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2016

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • APHAGE/IPC 2010-002

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Jaundice

Clinical Trials on biliary drainage

3
Subscribe