Breastfeeding Education Support Tool for Baby (BEST4Baby)

May 24, 2022 updated by: Thomas Jefferson University
This study will compare data associated with breastfeeding experiences and outcomes--specifically, breastfeeding continuation after initiation, exclusivity for 6 months of an infant's life, and breastfeeding duration--among 120 subjects recruited late in pregnancy and provided peer counseling and education services incorporating mobile health (mHealth) tools during a period of at least 6 months post-delivery with the data collected from a control group of approximately 120 mothers that did not receive the study intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Approximately 24 women that are experienced in breastfeeding will be recruited to serve in the role of breastfeeding peer counselors. These women will assess usability and acceptability of mobile health (mHealth) education tools designed following a series of focus groups for the project, Breastfeeding Education Support Tool for Baby. The mHealth tools will be used during the training and education of the peer counselor subjects. Following appropriate modification, some of the mHealth tools will be used with a total of approximately 120 women recruited late in pregnancy for initial breastfeeding counseling before delivery and the subsequent provision, for at least 6 months post-delivery, of home visits for peer counseling and education that integrates use of mHealth tools. Peer counselors and research staff will gather data from mothers receiving the intervention about breastfeeding experiences and outcomes, including breastfeeding continuation after initiation, exclusivity for 6 months of an infant's life, and breastfeeding duration. This data will be compared to data obtained through surveys administered to a control group of approximately 120 maternal subjects that received standard pre- and post-delivery care but not the study intervention of peer counseling and education using mHealth tools.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

247

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Karnataka
      • Belgaum, Karnataka, India, 590010
        • Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

A. Peer counselors

Inclusion Criteria:

Personal experience with breastfeeding - Residence in an intervention cluster

Exclusion Criteria:

- Failing to participate in peer counselor education/training provided for the study

B. Intervention Pregnant women-mothers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Willingness to consent to assignment to a breastfeeding peer counselor and to participate in counseling and education visits
  • Residence in an intervention cluster and intent to remain in the intervention area for a minimum of 6 months post-delivery

Exclusion Criteria:

- Pregnant women-mothers that indicate before delivery that they will not initiate breastfeeding

C. Control Subjects

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Mothers delivering during the study period that live in a non-intervention area that has been designated for recruitment of control subjects
  • Willingness to participate in a survey enabling collection of data for comparative purposes

Exclusion Criteria:

- None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention group
Breastfeeding counseling and education services using mHealth tools
Breastfeeding counseling and education by educated and trained peer counselors using mHealth tools
No Intervention: Comparative control group
No intervention, only standard of care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Breastfeeding initiation soon after birth
Time Frame: Ideally within an hour following a normal delivery
Maternal subjects' compliance with the recommendation to initiate breastfeeding soon after delivery
Ideally within an hour following a normal delivery
Exclusivity of breastfeeding during the first 6 months following an infant's birth
Time Frame: First 6 months following an infant's birth
Maternal subjects' compliance with the recommendation to provide only breast milk
First 6 months following an infant's birth
Breastfeeding continuation (along with supplemental feeding) after an infant reaches 6 months of age
Time Frame: As the study is time-limited, assessment will occur 6-9 months following an infant's birth
Maternal subjects' compliance with the recommendation for continued breastfeeding along with supplemental feeding after an infant reaches 6 months of age
As the study is time-limited, assessment will occur 6-9 months following an infant's birth

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Usability rating of the mHealth tools by peer counselors post-training
Time Frame: At the end of counseling education/training (project months 8-9)

Peer counselors will complete a scale, mHealth Tools Usability Scale for Peer Counselors

Information relevant to this scale:

Likert scale with 10 statements associated with usability: 5 positive and 5 negative

Range of responses 1. Strongly Disagree, 2. Disagree, 3. Neutral/No Opinion, 4. Agree, 5. Strongly Agree

Scoring: For positive items, the score contribution is the scale position number minus 1; and for negative items the contribution is 5 minus the scale position number. All scores are totaled and multiplied by 2.5, resulting in a total score per subject of 0-100. With this scoring method the higher the score, the greater is usability of the mHealth tools as perceived by the peer counselors after training but before actual use with mothers.

Scale is based upon one initially developed and tested by Digital Equipment Corporation; items have been slightly modified to achieve a better match with the BEST4Baby pilot.

At the end of counseling education/training (project months 8-9)
Usability rating of the mHealth tools by peer counselors based on use with mothers
Time Frame: Once peer counselors complete delivery of services to assigned maternal subjects (by months 22-23 of the project)

Peer counselors will complete a scale, mHealth Tools Usability Scale for Peer Counselors Based Upon Use with Mothers

Information relevant to the scale:

Likert Scale with 10 statements associated with usability: 5 positive and 5 negative

Range of responses 1. Strongly Disagree, 2. Disagree, 3. Neutral/No Opinion, 4. Agree, 5. Strongly Agree

Scoring: For positive items, the score contribution is the scale position number minus 1; and for negative items the contribution is 5 minus the scale position number. All scores are totaled and multiplied by 2.5, resulting in a total score per subject of 0-100. With this scoring method the higher the score, the greater is usability of the mHealth tools.as perceived by peer counselors based upon use with the mothers.

The scale is similar to the one for Secondary Outcome Measure 4 (and is similar to the referenced Digital Equipment Corporation scale).

Once peer counselors complete delivery of services to assigned maternal subjects (by months 22-23 of the project)
Acceptability rating of BEST4Baby program features by mothers
Time Frame: 3 months post-delivery

Maternal subjects will utilize a scale, Mothers Acceptability Rating Scale for BEST4Baby Program Features

Information relevant to this scale:

Likert Scale with 10 statements associated with features of the BEST4Baby program: 5 positive and 5 negative (related to peer counselor, home visits, educational modality, etc.)

Range of responses 1. Very unacceptable, 2. Unacceptable, 3. Neutral/No Opinion, 4. Acceptable, 5. Very Acceptable

Scoring: For positive items, the score contribution is the scale position number minus 1; and for negative items the contribution is 5 minus the scale position number. All scores are totaled and multiplied by 2.5, resulting in a total score per subject of 0-100. With this scoring method the higher the score, the more acceptable were program features to the maternal subject.

3 months post-delivery
Satisfaction rating of mothers with BEST4Baby counseling and education services as delivered
Time Frame: 6-9 months post-delivery

Maternal subjects will complete a scale, Mothers Level of Satisfaction with BEST4Baby Services as Delivered

Information relevant to this scale:

Likert Scale with 10 statements associated with level of satisfaction with BEST4Baby counseling and education services as delivered: 5 positive and 5 negative

Range of responses 1. Very unsatisfied, 2. Unsatisfied, 3. Neutral/No Opinion, 4. Satisfied, 5. Very Satisfied

Scoring: For positive items, the score contribution is the scale position number minus 1; and for negative items the contribution is 5 minus the scale position number. All scores are totaled and multiplied by 2.5, resulting in a total score per subject of 0-100. With this scoring method the higher the score, the more satisfied the subject was with the counseling and education services as delivered.

6-9 months post-delivery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Richard J. Derman, MD,, Thomas Jefferson University
  • Study Director: Shivaprasad S. Goudar, MD, MHPE, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 11, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

May 23, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 31, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 24, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 17F.517

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

De-identified participant data for the primary and secondary outcomes are expected to be shared in publications resulting from this pilot study.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Estimated availability : within 18 months of study closure.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Global health researchers upon request

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breastfeeding

Clinical Trials on Breastfeeding counseling and education services

3
Subscribe