- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03542409
Safety and Feasibility of Preoperative and Intraoperative Image-Guided Resection of Gliomas
Assessment of Safety and Feasibility of Preoperative and Intraoperative Image-Guided Resection of Gliomas and Tumor Region-Specific Biomarker Correlation
This study evaluates the use of specialized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques including magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion and 2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG) spectroscopy in the surgical treatment of gliomas.
Cohort 1 participants will undergo an MR perfusion scan or 2-HG spectroscopy prior to surgery and intra-operatively.
Cohort 2 participants will only undergo standard of care imaging and tumor acquisition. Participant participation will end at the completion of surgery and will be transitioned to standard of care follow-up.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Early Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Utah
-
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84112
- Huntsman Cancer Institute
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Suspected glioma (grade II, III, or IV)
- Preoperative MR perfusion (enhancing tumors)
- Preoperative MR 2-HG spectroscopy (nonenhancing tumors)
- Patient indicated for surgical resection, standard radiation, and standard chemotherapy as a standard of care
- Karnofsky performance status ≥ 60
- Life expectancy > 12 weeks
- Cohort 1: Ability to comply with study and follow-up procedures
- Cohort 2: Ability to comply with study procedures
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior diagnosis of intracranial glioma
- Other malignancy with expected need for systemic therapy within 3 years
- Inability to have 6000 grays of radiation to the brain
- Need for urgent palliative intervention for primary disease (e.g., impending herniation)
- Evidence of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy
- History of intracerebral abscess within 6 months prior to Day 0
- Major surgical procedure, open biopsy, or significant traumatic injury within 28 days prior to Day 0, anticipation of need for major surgical procedure during the course of the study
- Pregnant females
- Subjects unable to undergo an MRI with contrast
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Cohort 1, Group A (contrast enhancing tumor)
Group A patients will undergo standard tumor preoperative imaging and MR perfusion scan prior to surgical resection.
Group A patients will undergo standard intraoperative imaging along with MR perfusion scan during surgical resection.
|
MR perfusion scan before and during surgery.
|
|
Experimental: Cohort 1, Group B (non-enhancing tumor)
Group B patients will undergo standard tumor preoperative imaging and 2HG spectroscopy scan prior to surgical resection.
Group A patients will undergo standard intraoperative imaging along with 2HG spectroscopy scan during surgical resection.
|
2HG spectroscopy scan before and during surgery.
|
|
Experimental: Cohort 2
During the analysis for cohort 1, we found significant differences in the pre MRI samples and the post intraoperative MRI samples. Cohort 2, which will include 10 additional patients, has be created to confirm these differences. Unlike cohort 1, advanced imaging (2-HG spectroscopy and MR perfusion) is not needed to make this comparison. The standard of care intraoperative MRI sequences used routinely will be sufficient for these 10 new samples. The specific aim of Cohort 2 is: 1. Compare areas from initial surgery with that of extended resection after intraoperative SOC MRI in 10 additional subjects (Cohort 2). |
The standard of care intraoperative MRI sequences used routinely will be sufficient for these 10 new samples.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Intraoperative Imaging Completion
Time Frame: 1 day
|
This is a feasibility study to see whether advanced imaging modalities can be used intraoperatively so the primary outcome is a yes/no regarding completion of imaging.
|
1 day
|
|
Incidence of Patient Complications Following Tumor Resection
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Any surgical complications at post-op, hospital discharge, 1-month, 3-months, 6-months, and 1 year following surgery using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)
|
1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Randy Jensen, MD, PhD, Huntsman Cancer Institute
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Cao Y, Sundgren PC, Tsien CI, Chenevert TT, Junck L. Physiologic and metabolic magnetic resonance imaging in gliomas. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Mar 10;24(8):1228-35. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.7233.
- Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Taphoorn MJ, Janzer RC, Ludwin SK, Allgeier A, Fisher B, Belanger K, Hau P, Brandes AA, Gijtenbeek J, Marosi C, Vecht CJ, Mokhtari K, Wesseling P, Villa S, Eisenhauer E, Gorlia T, Weller M, Lacombe D, Cairncross JG, Mirimanoff RO; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumour and Radiation Oncology Groups; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009 May;10(5):459-66. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70025-7. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
- Senft C, Bink A, Franz K, Vatter H, Gasser T, Seifert V. Intraoperative MRI guidance and extent of resection in glioma surgery: a randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Oct;12(11):997-1003. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70196-6. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
- Parsons DW, Jones S, Zhang X, Lin JC, Leary RJ, Angenendt P, Mankoo P, Carter H, Siu IM, Gallia GL, Olivi A, McLendon R, Rasheed BA, Keir S, Nikolskaya T, Nikolsky Y, Busam DA, Tekleab H, Diaz LA Jr, Hartigan J, Smith DR, Strausberg RL, Marie SK, Shinjo SM, Yan H, Riggins GJ, Bigner DD, Karchin R, Papadopoulos N, Parmigiani G, Vogelstein B, Velculescu VE, Kinzler KW. An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme. Science. 2008 Sep 26;321(5897):1807-12. doi: 10.1126/science.1164382. Epub 2008 Sep 4.
- Bloch O, Han SJ, Cha S, Sun MZ, Aghi MK, McDermott MW, Berger MS, Parsa AT. Impact of extent of resection for recurrent glioblastoma on overall survival: clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2012 Dec;117(6):1032-8. doi: 10.3171/2012.9.JNS12504. Epub 2012 Oct 5.
- Fouke SJ, Benzinger T, Gibson D, Ryken TC, Kalkanis SN, Olson JJ. The role of imaging in the management of adults with diffuse low grade glioma: A systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Neurooncol. 2015 Dec;125(3):457-79. doi: 10.1007/s11060-015-1908-9. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
- Li YM, Suki D, Hess K, Sawaya R. The influence of maximum safe resection of glioblastoma on survival in 1229 patients: Can we do better than gross-total resection? J Neurosurg. 2016 Apr;124(4):977-88. doi: 10.3171/2015.5.JNS142087. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
- Law M, Young RJ, Babb JS, Peccerelli N, Chheang S, Gruber ML, Miller DC, Golfinos JG, Zagzag D, Johnson G. Gliomas: predicting time to progression or survival with cerebral blood volume measurements at dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging. Radiology. 2008 May;247(2):490-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2472070898. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
- Lacroix M, Abi-Said D, Fourney DR, Gokaslan ZL, Shi W, DeMonte F, Lang FF, McCutcheon IE, Hassenbusch SJ, Holland E, Hess K, Michael C, Miller D, Sawaya R. A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: prognosis, extent of resection, and survival. J Neurosurg. 2001 Aug;95(2):190-8. doi: 10.3171/jns.2001.95.2.0190.
- Sanai N, Berger MS. Glioma extent of resection and its impact on patient outcome. Neurosurgery. 2008 Apr;62(4):753-64; discussion 264-6. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000318159.21731.cf.
- Lemee JM, Clavreul A, Menei P. Intratumoral heterogeneity in glioblastoma: don't forget the peritumoral brain zone. Neuro Oncol. 2015 Oct;17(10):1322-32. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov119. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
- Jensen RL, Mumert ML, Gillespie DL, Kinney AY, Schabel MC, Salzman KL. Preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI correlates with molecular markers of hypoxia and vascularity in specific areas of intratumoral microenvironment and is predictive of patient outcome. Neuro Oncol. 2014 Jan;16(2):280-91. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/not148. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
- Chen R, Ravindra VM, Cohen AL, Jensen RL, Salzman KL, Prescot AP, Colman H. Molecular features assisting in diagnosis, surgery, and treatment decision making in low-grade gliomas. Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Mar;38(3):E2. doi: 10.3171/2015.1.FOCUS14745.
- Karsy M, Neil JA, Guan J, Mahan MA, Colman H, Jensen RL. A practical review of prognostic correlations of molecular biomarkers in glioblastoma. Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Mar;38(3):E4. doi: 10.3171/2015.1.FOCUS14755.
- Huse JT, Holland EC. Targeting brain cancer: advances in the molecular pathology of malignant glioma and medulloblastoma. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010 May;10(5):319-31. doi: 10.1038/nrc2818.
- Karsy M, Huang T, Kleinman G, Karpel-Massler G. Molecular, histopathological, and genomic variants of glioblastoma. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2014 Jun 1;19(7):1065-87. doi: 10.2741/4268.
- Claus EB, Walsh KM, Wiencke JK, Molinaro AM, Wiemels JL, Schildkraut JM, Bondy ML, Berger M, Jenkins R, Wrensch M. Survival and low-grade glioma: the emergence of genetic information. Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Jan;38(1):E6. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.FOCUS12367.
- Hervey-Jumper SL, Berger MS. Role of surgical resection in low- and high-grade gliomas. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2014 Apr;16(4):284. doi: 10.1007/s11940-014-0284-7.
- Beiko J, Suki D, Hess KR, Fox BD, Cheung V, Cabral M, Shonka N, Gilbert MR, Sawaya R, Prabhu SS, Weinberg J, Lang FF, Aldape KD, Sulman EP, Rao G, McCutcheon IE, Cahill DP. IDH1 mutant malignant astrocytomas are more amenable to surgical resection and have a survival benefit associated with maximal surgical resection. Neuro Oncol. 2014 Jan;16(1):81-91. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/not159. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
- Cohen AL, Holmen SL, Colman H. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2013 May;13(5):345. doi: 10.1007/s11910-013-0345-4.
- Noushmehr H, Weisenberger DJ, Diefes K, Phillips HS, Pujara K, Berman BP, Pan F, Pelloski CE, Sulman EP, Bhat KP, Verhaak RG, Hoadley KA, Hayes DN, Perou CM, Schmidt HK, Ding L, Wilson RK, Van Den Berg D, Shen H, Bengtsson H, Neuvial P, Cope LM, Buckley J, Herman JG, Baylin SB, Laird PW, Aldape K; Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Identification of a CpG island methylator phenotype that defines a distinct subgroup of glioma. Cancer Cell. 2010 May 18;17(5):510-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.03.017. Epub 2010 Apr 15.
- Kickingereder P, Sahm F, Radbruch A, Wick W, Heiland S, Deimling Av, Bendszus M, Wiestler B. IDH mutation status is associated with a distinct hypoxia/angiogenesis transcriptome signature which is non-invasively predictable with rCBV imaging in human glioma. Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 5;5:16238. doi: 10.1038/srep16238.
- Lee S, Choi SH, Ryoo I, Yoon TJ, Kim TM, Lee SH, Park CK, Kim JH, Sohn CH, Park SH, Kim IH. Evaluation of the microenvironmental heterogeneity in high-grade gliomas with IDH1/2 gene mutation using histogram analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic-susceptibility contrast perfusion imaging. J Neurooncol. 2015 Jan;121(1):141-50. doi: 10.1007/s11060-014-1614-z. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
- Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Fulop J, Liu M, Blanda R, Kromer C, Wolinsky Y, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2008-2012. Neuro Oncol. 2015 Oct;17 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):iv1-iv62. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov189. Epub 2015 Oct 27. No abstract available.
- Ohgaki H, Kleihues P. The definition of primary and secondary glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Feb 15;19(4):764-72. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-3002. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
- Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature. 2008 Oct 23;455(7216):1061-8. doi: 10.1038/nature07385. Epub 2008 Sep 4.
- Wen Q, Jalilian L, Lupo JM, Molinaro AM, Chang SM, Clarke J, Prados M, Nelson SJ. Comparison of ADC metrics and their association with outcome for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma being treated with radiation therapy, temozolomide, erlotinib and bevacizumab. J Neurooncol. 2015 Jan;121(2):331-9. doi: 10.1007/s11060-014-1636-6. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
- Ellingson BM, Cloughesy TF, Pope WB, Zaw TM, Phillips H, Lalezari S, Nghiemphu PL, Ibrahim H, Naeini KM, Harris RJ, Lai A. Anatomic localization of O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylated and unmethylated tumors: a radiographic study in 358 de novo human glioblastomas. Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 16;59(2):908-16. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.076. Epub 2011 Oct 7.
- Guzman-De-Villoria JA, Mateos-Perez JM, Fernandez-Garcia P, Castro E, Desco M. Added value of advanced over conventional magnetic resonance imaging in grading gliomas and other primary brain tumors. Cancer Imaging. 2014 Dec 12;14(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s40644-014-0035-8.
- Watanabe T, Nobusawa S, Kleihues P, Ohgaki H. IDH1 mutations are early events in the development of astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas. Am J Pathol. 2009 Apr;174(4):1149-53. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.080958. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
- M. Karsy et al., Meta-analysis of the Effect of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 and 2 Mutation on Glioblastoma Prognosis. Contemporary Neurosurgery 37, 1-5 (2015).
- Labussiere M, Boisselier B, Mokhtari K, Di Stefano AL, Rahimian A, Rossetto M, Ciccarino P, Saulnier O, Paterra R, Marie Y, Finocchiaro G, Sanson M. Combined analysis of TERT, EGFR, and IDH status defines distinct prognostic glioblastoma classes. Neurology. 2014 Sep 23;83(13):1200-6. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000814. Epub 2014 Aug 22.
- SongTao Q, Lei Y, Si G, YanQing D, HuiXia H, XueLin Z, LanXiao W, Fei Y. IDH mutations predict longer survival and response to temozolomide in secondary glioblastoma. Cancer Sci. 2012 Feb;103(2):269-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.02134.x. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
- Stancheva G, Goranova T, Laleva M, Kamenova M, Mitkova A, Velinov N, Poptodorov G, Mitev V, Kaneva R, Gabrovsky N. IDH1/IDH2 but not TP53 mutations predict prognosis in Bulgarian glioblastoma patients. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:654727. doi: 10.1155/2014/654727. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
- Choi JS, Baek HM, Kim S, Kim MJ, Youk JH, Moon HJ, Kim EK, Han KH, Kim DH, Kim SI, Koo JS. HR-MAS MR spectroscopy of breast cancer tissue obtained with core needle biopsy: correlation with prognostic factors. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051712. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
- Kubben PL, ter Meulen KJ, Schijns OE, ter Laak-Poort MP, van Overbeeke JJ, van Santbrink H. Intraoperative MRI-guided resection of glioblastoma multiforme: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Oct;12(11):1062-70. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70130-9. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
- Olubiyi OI, Ozdemir A, Incekara F, Tie Y, Dolati P, Hsu L, Santagata S, Chen Z, Rigolo L, Golby AJ. Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Intracranial Glioma Resection: A Single-Center, Retrospective Blinded Volumetric Study. World Neurosurg. 2015 Aug;84(2):528-36. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.04.044. Epub 2015 May 1.
- Karsy M, Albert L, Murali R, Jhanwar-Uniyal M. The impact of arsenic trioxide and all-trans retinoic acid on p53 R273H-codon mutant glioblastoma. Tumour Biol. 2014 May;35(5):4567-80. doi: 10.1007/s13277-013-1601-6. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
- Shinoura N, Midorikawa A, Yamada R, Hana T, Saito A, Hiromitsu K, Itoi C, Saito S, Yagi K. Awake craniotomy for brain lesions within and near the primary motor area: A retrospective analysis of factors associated with worsened paresis in 102 consecutive patients. Surg Neurol Int. 2013 Nov 22;4:149. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.122003. eCollection 2013.
- Chang SM, Parney IF, McDermott M, Barker FG 2nd, Schmidt MH, Huang W, Laws ER Jr, Lillehei KO, Bernstein M, Brem H, Sloan AE, Berger M; Glioma Outcomes Investigators. Perioperative complications and neurological outcomes of first and second craniotomies among patients enrolled in the Glioma Outcome Project. J Neurosurg. 2003 Jun;98(6):1175-81. doi: 10.3171/jns.2003.98.6.1175.
- Hervey-Jumper SL, Berger MS. Technical nuances of awake brain tumor surgery and the role of maximum safe resection. J Neurosurg Sci. 2015 Dec;59(4):351-60. Epub 2015 Sep 22.
- Sakurada K, Matsuda K, Funiu H, Kuge A, Takemura S, Sato S, Kayama T. Usefulness of multimodal examination and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging system in glioma surgery. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2012;52(8):553-7. doi: 10.2176/nmc.52.553.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 77238
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.