Safety and Efficacy of the New 20 mm Lumen Apposing Metal Stent (Lams) for Endoscopic Treatment of Pancreatic and Peripancreatic Fluid Collections

July 10, 2019 updated by: Istituto Clinico Humanitas

Safety and Efficacy of the New 20 mm Lumen Apposing Metal Stent (Lams) for Endoscopic Treatment of Pancreatic and Peripancreatic Fluid Collections: a Large, International, Multicenter Study

Pancreatic fluid collections (PFC) can occur as a complication of acute and chronic pancreatitis. PFC include pancreatic pseudocysts (PP) and walled-off necrosis (WON).

The majorities of WON are asymptomatic and will resolve spontaneously. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage has become the preferred treatment in the management of symptomatic PFC, with significant advantages compared with surgical and percutaneous drainage. Successful endoscopic management of the pancreatic fluid collections depends on the type of PFC. Studies have shown that endoscopic drainage of PP is greater than 90%, while success for WON is at best between 50-65%. Differences in treatment outcome are attributed to the viscosity and debris content of the PFC. Traditionally, the EUS-guided drainage has been performed with placement of multiple plastic stents or fully covered self-expanding metal stent.

Recently, lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) have been developed. LAMS have been utilized for the access and drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). To date, a variety of LAMS sizes have been commercially available and widely used. Studies have shown high technical success (89-100%) and high clinical success rate (93-100%). The larger diameter of LAMS facilitates better drainage of PFC contents when compared to the small caliber of plastic stents and allows necrosectomy in repeated sessions without the need for stent replacement.

A new LAMS with a larger (20mm) lumen diameter (the Hot Axios, Boston Scientific, Natick MA, USA) was released on the market, with the idea that a larger diameter would allow a faster drainage of PFCs and facilitate endoscopic necrosectomy. This is currently the largest diameter LAMS available.

Further studies are needed to determine the ideal size for a LAMS going forward to achieve maximal clinical benefit with minimal patient risk.

Aim of the investigator's study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the new 20 mm Hot Axios stent placement for EUS-guided transmural drainage of pancreatic fluid collections.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Pancreatic fluid collections (PFC) can occur as a complication of acute and chronic pancreatitis. PFC include pancreatic pseudocysts (PP) and walled-off necrosis (WON).

The majorities of WON are asymptomatic and will resolve spontaneously. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage has become the preferred treatment in the management of symptomatic PFC, with significant advantages compared with surgical and percutaneous drainage. Successful endoscopic management of the pancreatic fluid collections depends on the type of PFC. Studies have shown that endoscopic drainage of PP is greater than 90%, while success for WON is at best between 50-65%. Differences in treatment outcome are attributed to the viscosity and debris content of the PFC. Traditionally, the EUS-guided drainage has been performed with placement of multiple plastic stents or fully covered self-expanding metal stent.

Recently, lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) have been developed. LAMS have been utilized for the access and drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). To date, a variety of LAMS sizes have been commercially available and widely used. Studies have shown high technical success (89-100%) and high clinical success rate (93-100%). The larger diameter of LAMS facilitates better drainage of PFC contents when compared to the small caliber of plastic stents and allows necrosectomy in repeated sessions without the need for stent replacement.

A new LAMS with a larger (20mm) lumen diameter (the Hot Axios, Boston Scientific, Natick MA, USA) was released on the market, with the idea that a larger diameter would allow a faster drainage of PFCs and facilitate endoscopic necrosectomy. This is currently the largest diameter LAMS available.

Further studies are needed to determine the ideal size for a LAMS going forward to achieve maximal clinical benefit with minimal patient risk.

Aim of the investigator's study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the new 20 mm Hot Axios stent placement for EUS-guided transmural drainage of pancreatic fluid collections.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Milano, Italy, 20089
        • Humanitas Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-guided 20 mm Hot Axios stent placement for PFCs were included.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No exclusion criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The investigators will evaluate the use of the new 20 mm Hot Axios in endoscopic transmural drainage through the reduction pof the bilirubin's value
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The investigators will assess the rate/severity of adverse events (AEs) (ASGE lexicon).
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Repici Alessandro, MD, Humanitas Research Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 21, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 5, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 6, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Axios 20 mm

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pancreatic Diseases

Clinical Trials on Hot Axios stent

3
Subscribe