A Study to Investigate Apatinib Combined Capecitabine on Adjuvant Therapy of Biliary Carcinoma

Apatinib Combined Capecitabine Versus Capecitabine Alone for Adjuvant Therapy in Patients After Biliary Carcinoma Surgery: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

It is a prospective,parallel study to investigate the saftety and efficacy of Apatinib combined Capacitabine in the adjuvant treatment of the biliary cancinoma after operation.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Subjects were randomly divided into experimental and control groups. The experimental group was postoperatively treated with apatinib combined with capecitabine for adjuvant therapy of biliary cancer, and the control group was treated with capecitabine alone.

Progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), EORTC QLQ-C30, HCC-18 and drug safety: vital signs, laboratory indicators, adverse event (AE), and serious adverse event (SAE), drug-related AE and SAE and their specific AE (such as hypertension, proteinuria, and hand-foot syndrome) were followed for research in the two groups to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the two regimens for the treatment of biliary tract cancer according to the standard of NCI-CTCAE V4.0.

A rigorous, randomized and prospective study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety in treating biliary cancer between the combined use of apatinib mesylate plus capecitabine and capecitabine alone, with a view to improving the survival outcome and life quality of patients with biliary tract cancer.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Guangxi
      • Nanning, Guangxi, China, 530021
        • First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
        • Contact:
          • Jie Ma, doctor

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fully aware of the research and voluntarily signed informed consent (informed consent must be signed prior to the execution of any required test procedure);
  • Patients received removal of biliary tract cancers that have been confirmed by histology or cytology, including intrahepatic bile duct carcinoma (IHCC), extrahepatic bile duct cancer (EHCC), and gallbladder cancer(GBC);
  • Normal function of major organs that meets the following criteria:

Blood routine examination:

HB≥90 g/L; ANC≥1.5×109/L; PLT≥60×109/L;

Biochemical examination:

ALB ≥29 g/L; ALT and AST<2.5ULN; TBIL ≤2ULN; Creatinine≤1.5ULN;

  • ECOG physical condition scores 0 or 1;
  • Fertile male or female patients volunteer to use effective contraception methods during the research period, such as double-barrier contraceptive methods, condoms, oral or injectable contraceptives, intrauterine devices, etc.
  • Fertile and non-lactational female who show negative in serum or urine pregnancy test within 7 days before inclusion for the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those who received approved or on-going anti-tumor therapy within 4 weeks before the research;
  • Those who received other anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors or monoclonal antibodies that had been approved or under study before the research;
  • Abnormal laboratory tests that have significant clinical implication;
  • International normalized ratio (INR) ≥ 1.5 or partially activated prothrombin time (APTT) ≥ 1.5 × ULN;
  • The patient's current serum potassium, serum magnesium, or serum calcium is below the normal reference range of laboratory test (whether supplemented or not), or >CTCAE grade 1;
  • Patients currently suffering from hypertension that cannot be controlled with drugs;
  • The researchers conclude electrolyte abnormalities that are clinically significant;
  • There is severe bleeding or hemoptysis in the past or at current stage, or there are thromboembolic events within 12 months;
  • Cardiovascular diseases that are clinically significant;
  • ECG showed QTcB interval ≥ 480 milliseconds in resting state;
  • Suffering from other malignant tumors in the past 5 years, excluding basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma after receiving radical surgery, or carcinoma in situ of cervix;
  • Active or uncontrollable serious infection (≥ CTCAE grade 2 infection), including but not limited to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection;
  • Known history of liver disease with evident significance;
  • The patient currently has brain metastasis or spinal compression, except individual cases.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Test Group
Apatinib combined with Capetabine
Capecitabine, 1000mg/m2, oral administration, twice daily (once in the morning and once in the evening with an interval of 12 hours, equivalent to a total daily dose of 2000 mg/m2), continuous medication for 14 days and off for 7 days. Every 21 days is a cycle, and there shall be a total of 8 cycles. If the subject is still unable to tolerate toxicity after experiencing two dose adjustments, he/she should be moved out of the group.
Other Names:
  • Xeloda
Apatinib, 500 mg, administered orally (after breakfast) once daily from day 1 to day 21 (including day 21) with continuous administration. Every 21 days serve as a cycle. If after 2 dose adjustments, the subject is still unable to tolerate toxicity, he/she should be moved out of the group.
Other Names:
  • Aitan
Active Comparator: Control Group
Capecitabine
Capecitabine, 1000mg/m2, oral administration, twice daily (once in the morning and once in the evening with an interval of 12 hours, equivalent to a total daily dose of 2000 mg/m2), continuous medication for 14 days and off for 7 days. Every 21 days is a cycle, and there shall be a total of 8 cycles. If the subject is still unable to tolerate toxicity after experiencing two dose adjustments, he/she should be moved out of the group.
Other Names:
  • Xeloda

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-free survival
Time Frame: 12 months
the length of time during the recruiment and after the progression of the biliary cancer verified by imagine examination
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
overall survival
Time Frame: 24 months
the length of time during the recruitment and after the death of the patient
24 months
objective response rate
Time Frame: 24 months
The proportion of patients whose tumors have shrunk to a certain amount and maintained for a certain period of time, including complete response and partial response cases
24 months
Disease Control rate
Time Frame: 24 months
The proportion of patients whose tumors have shrunk to a certain amount and maintained for a certain period of time, including complete response, partial response and stable disease cases
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jie Ma, doctor, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

September 10, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 10, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 25, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 24, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Biliary Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Capecitabine

3
Subscribe