- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03611257
Effect of dRAST on Treatment for Bacteremia in Patients With Hematologic Diseases
October 11, 2019 updated by: Wan Beom Park, Seoul National University Hospital
Effect of Direct Rapid Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing (dRAST) on Treatment for Bacteremia in Patients With Hematologic Diseases: Randomized Controlled Trial
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the use of direct rapid antibiotic susceptibility test (dRAST), in addition to the current standard antibiotic susceptibility test, can increase the proportion of patients with hematologic disease who received appropriate antibiotics in early period of bacteremia.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
- patients with hematologic diseases who have high risk of bacteremia, because of immune suppression treatment or intensive chemotherapy or bone marrow transplantation which these patients had received, will be recruited in tertiary referral medical centers.
- All the participants will be randomly assigned into either dRAST group or current standard antibiotic susceptibility test group.
- All the participants in the both arms will receive antimicrobial stewardship by infectious disease specialists. Antimicrobial stewardship will be performed at each timepoint of Gram stain results reporting, dRAST results reporting, and current method reporting.
- Target numbers are 58 and 58, respectively.
- All the participants will be monitored for general medical conditions such as vital sign and response to antibiotic treatment by infectious disease specialists for 1 week.
- The percentage of patients who received optimal targeted antibiotics 72 hours after blood collection for blood culture will be evaluated.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
116
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 110-744
- Seoul National University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
16 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients who are expected to be admitted for more than 2 days due to treatment or complications of hematologic diseases (acute leukemia, chronic leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, aplastic anemia, etc.) in Seoul National University Hospital.
- Patients with confirmed bacteremia
- Patients who can understand the details of the clinical trial's explanation and provide the written consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who are expected to stay in the hospital within 2 days
- Patients without bacteremia during hospitalization
- Patients who show fungemia without evidence of bacteremia
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: dRAST
Hematologic patients with bacteremia will receive antibiotics based on "dRAST" results.
|
Infectious diseases specialists will do active antimicrobial stewardship according to dRAST results in addition to Gram staining results and current standard method.
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Current standard method
Hematologic patients with bacteremia will receive antibiotics based on current standard method results.
|
Infectious diseases specialists will do active antimicrobial stewardship according to Gram staining results, and current standard method without dRAST results.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Percentage of patients receiving optimal targeted antibiotics 72 hours after blood collection for blood culture
Time Frame: 72 hour after blood culture collection
|
The percentage of patients receiving optimal targeted antibiotics antibiotics which is defined as most effective and narrowest antibiotics based on susceptibility testing results, 72 hours after blood collection for blood culture
|
72 hour after blood culture collection
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Time to optimal targeted antibiotics
Time Frame: Time from first blood culture collection up to 1 month
|
The time to the optimal targeted antibiotics administration after blood culture collection
|
Time from first blood culture collection up to 1 month
|
Amount of broad-spectrum antibiotics use
Time Frame: Time from first blood culture collection up to 1 week
|
The duration of use of major antibiotics (vancomycin, carbapenem)
|
Time from first blood culture collection up to 1 week
|
Time to defervescence
Time Frame: Time from first blood culture collection up to 1 month
|
Time from the time of blood culture collection to the time of fever resolution
|
Time from first blood culture collection up to 1 month
|
proportion of positive blood culture 48 hours after first blood culture
Time Frame: Time from blood culture collection up to 1 month
|
proportion of positive blood culture 48 hours after first blood culture
|
Time from blood culture collection up to 1 month
|
30-day mortality rate related with bacteremia
Time Frame: Time from blood culture collection up to 30-day
|
30-day mortality rate related with bacteremia
|
Time from blood culture collection up to 30-day
|
Percentage of patients receiving optimal targeted antibiotics 48 hours after
Time Frame: 48 hour after blood culture collection
|
The percentage of patients receiving optimal targeted antibiotics antibiotics which is defined as most effective and narrowest antibiotics based on susceptibility testing results, 48 hours after blood collection for blood culture
|
48 hour after blood culture collection
|
Percentage of patients receiving unnecessary broad spectrum antibiotics 48 hours after
Time Frame: 48 hour after blood culture collection
|
The percentage of patients receiving unnecessary broad spectrum antibiotics which is defined as administration of antibiotics to which organisms were susceptible, but had broad-spectrum activity requiring de-escalation or discontinuing administration, 48 hours after blood collection for blood culture
|
48 hour after blood culture collection
|
Percentage of patients receiving unnecessary broad spectrum antibiotics 72 hours after
Time Frame: 72 hour after blood culture collection
|
The percentage of patients receiving unnecessary broad spectrum antibiotics which is defined as administration of antibiotics to which organisms were susceptible, but had broad-spectrum activity requiring de-escalation or discontinuing administration, 72 hours after blood collection for blood culture
|
72 hour after blood culture collection
|
Percentage of patients receiving ineffective antibiotics 48 hours after
Time Frame: 48 hour after blood culture collection
|
The percentage of patients receiving ineffective antibiotics which is defined if the organisms were not susceptible, 48 hours after blood collection for blood culture
|
48 hour after blood culture collection
|
Percentage of patients receiving ineffective antibiotics 72 hours after
Time Frame: 72 hour after blood culture collection
|
The percentage of patients receiving ineffective antibiotics which is defined if the organisms were not susceptible, 72 hours after blood collection for blood culture
|
72 hour after blood culture collection
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: wbpark1@snu.ac.kr Park, M.D., PhD., Seoul National University Hospital
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE, Light B, Parrillo JE, Sharma S, Suppes R, Feinstein D, Zanotti S, Taiberg L, Gurka D, Kumar A, Cheang M. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2006 Jun;34(6):1589-96. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000217961.75225.E9.
- Choi J, Yoo J, Lee M, Kim EG, Lee JS, Lee S, Joo S, Song SH, Kim EC, Lee JC, Kim HC, Jung YG, Kwon S. A rapid antimicrobial susceptibility test based on single-cell morphological analysis. Sci Transl Med. 2014 Dec 17;6(267):267ra174. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009650.
- Choi J, Jeong HY, Lee GY, Han S, Han S, Jin B, Lim T, Kim S, Kim DY, Kim HC, Kim EC, Song SH, Kim TS, Kwon S. Direct, rapid antimicrobial susceptibility test from positive blood cultures based on microscopic imaging analysis. Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 25;7(1):1148. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01278-2.
- Huh HJ, Song DJ, Shim HJ, Kwon WK, Park MS, Ryu MR, Cho EH, Oh J, Yoo IY, Lee NY. Performance evaluation of the QMAC-dRAST for staphylococci and enterococci isolated from blood culture: a comparative study of performance with the VITEK-2 system. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 May 1;73(5):1267-1271. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky015.
- Garnacho-Montero J, Aldabo-Pallas T, Garnacho-Montero C, Cayuela A, Jimenez R, Barroso S, Ortiz-Leyba C. Timing of adequate antibiotic therapy is a greater determinant of outcome than are TNF and IL-10 polymorphisms in patients with sepsis. Crit Care. 2006;10(4):R111. doi: 10.1186/cc4995.
- Bauer KA, Perez KK, Forrest GN, Goff DA. Review of rapid diagnostic tests used by antimicrobial stewardship programs. Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Oct 15;59 Suppl 3:S134-45. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu547.
- Renders NH, Kluytmans JA, Verbrugh HA. Clinical impact of rapid in vitro susceptibility testing and bacterial identification. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Feb;33(2):508. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.2.508-508.1995. No abstract available.
- Klastersky J, Ameye L, Maertens J, Georgala A, Muanza F, Aoun M, Ferrant A, Rapoport B, Rolston K, Paesmans M. Bacteraemia in febrile neutropenic cancer patients. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007 Nov;30 Suppl 1:S51-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.06.012. Epub 2007 Aug 8.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
September 1, 2018
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
September 15, 2019
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
October 10, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 26, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 1, 2018
First Posted (ACTUAL)
August 2, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
October 14, 2019
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 11, 2019
Last Verified
October 1, 2019
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1806-173-955
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
We are not planning to share IPDs publically, but de-identified individual participant data for all outcome measures could be shared with other researchers under their request.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hematologic Diseases
-
St. Jude Children's Research HospitalRecruitingRefractory Hematologic Malignancy | Relapsed Hematologic MalignancyUnited States
-
University of Colorado, DenverNot yet recruitingHematologic Malignancy | Pediatric Patients | Other Hematologic ConditionUnited States
-
Epizyme, Inc.WithdrawnRefractory Hematologic Malignancy | Relapsed Hematologic MalignancyUnited States
-
Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.Not yet recruitingHematologic MalignancyChina
-
Innovent Biologics (Suzhou) Co. Ltd.Recruiting
-
Massachusetts General HospitalRecruiting
-
Fondazione EMN Italy OnlusCompletedHEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCIESItaly
-
Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant...National Cancer Institute (NCI); National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute... and other collaboratorsCompletedHematologic MalignancyUnited States
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkNovo Nordisk A/SCompletedHematologic MalignancyDenmark
-
SecuraBioCompletedHematologic MalignancyUnited States, Italy