Clinical Assessment of Color Stability and Patient Satisfaction for Polished Versus Glazed Lithium Disilicate Glass Ceramic Restorations and Patient Satisfaction

October 3, 2018 updated by: Rasha Sayed Mosallam, Cairo University
Dental overglaze is consist of colorless glass powder and applied to the fired crown surface to provide a glossy surface,Adjustment procedure break the production of the glaze layer through a natural glaze or overglaze process and create a rough surface, glazing or polishing after adjustment procedures is important to enhance the appearance of the restoration

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Dental overglaze is consist of colorless glass powder and applied to the fired crown surface to provide a glossy surface. Natural glaze is a vitrified layer that is formed on the surface of the porcelain containing a glass phase when the porcelain is heated to a glazing temperature for a specific time, Adjustment procedure break the production of the glaze layer through a natural glaze or overglaze process and create a rough surface, The color of porcelain restorations is affected by surface roughness because rough surface reflects light irregularly and less than a glazed surface . Therefore, glazing or polishing after adjustment procedures is important to enhance the appearance of the restoration .

Although glazed surfaces appeared whiter, the CIE L* value measured with the specular component excluded (SCE) geometry was lower than that of polished surfaces (28).Several reports have investigated different polishing techniques that support the use of polishing as an alternative for glazing of ceramic restorations .

Polishing can reduce chair time, eliminates laboratory procedures, infection control may be obtained . Polishing is also important for the porcelain surface for esthetic so several different techniques have been described for repolishing porcelain surfaces in the mouth .

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All subjects are required to be:

    1. From 18-50 years old, be able to read and sign the informed consent document.
    2. Physically and psychologically able to tolerate conventional restorative procedures
    3. have no active periodontal or pulpal diseases, have teeth with good restorations
    4. Willing to return for follow-up examinations and evaluation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Patients in the growth stage with partially erupted teeth 2. Patients with poor oral hygiene and motivation 3. Pregnant women's 4. Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: glazed IPS e.max
lithium disilicate glazed crowns that proved to have a good color stability
glazing of IPS e.max crowns
Other Names:
  • glazed IPS e.max
polishing of IPS e.max crowns
Other Names:
  • polished IPS e.max
Experimental: polished IPS e.max
polished lithium disilicate crowns with the polishing kit
glazing of IPS e.max crowns
Other Names:
  • glazed IPS e.max
polishing of IPS e.max crowns
Other Names:
  • polished IPS e.max

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
color stability
Time Frame: one year
L* a* b* values and ∆E
one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
patient satisfaction
Time Frame: one year
patient satisfaction through a questionnaire
one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

November 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 3, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 5, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 5, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Color Change of Lithium Disilicate Crowns

Clinical Trials on glazed lithium disilicate crowns

3
Subscribe