Stockholm Preterm Interaction-Based Intervention (SPIBI)

April 19, 2024 updated by: Professor Mara Westling Allodi, Stockholm University
Extreme premature Children will at discharge from Karolinska Hospital and Södersjukhuset in Stockholm be asked to participate in a study, examining the effects of a home-visit based post-discharge program aiming at facilitating the interaction between infants and parents, improving the development of the children, and the parental mental health. The study is a randomized controlled Trial (RCT), hence 50% of the participants will be offered treatment as usual (TAU) with addition of an extended follow-up program. The interaction-based program consists of one initial visit at the hospital followed by nine home-visits and two telephone calls during the child's first year of life. The interventionists are skilled Healthcare professionals with several years of experience from caring for premature infants and their parents. All interventionists have successfully completed a one year further education program, delivered one day per week and containing theoretical lectures, practice with actual cases, supervision on the cases, visits to the different parts of the neonatal care chain and discussions with a representative from the premature family association Sweden.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Detailed description of the intervention: the purpose of the initial visit at the neonatal unit or hospital ward where the child is still treated is to establish the foundation for the interventionist/family relationship and give the parent(-s) the opportunity to show the interventionist the environment where the infant has spent his/her first 3-5 months in life.

Home-visit 1-3 and two telephone calls are provided before the child is three months corrected age. The focus of these home visits is to observe child and parent at home and validate the child's strengths and competences as well as enhancing the parent-child interaction, building on strengths. The child's strengths and interests will be summarized in a logbook owned by the parents. During home-visit 4-8 the interventionist, step by step and always with great regard to the child's level of development, will support the parent in using the home-environment in a developmental supporting manner for the child, find suitable objects/toys at home for the child to examine with mouth, hands and body, confirm the child's abilities and give suggestions on how to stimulate the child's further development. The logbook will now also contain suggestions for supporting the next developmental step, which will be formulated by the interventionist together with the parent. The ninth and last home-visit will emphasize the child's progress during the past year, look through the family logbook and both summarize the past year and talk about the next developmental step for the future.

The intervention group receives the standard follow-up program just as the control group and will be referred to specialized care when needed. Compared to children not participating in the study, the study participants will receive an extended follow-up program, with assessment and questionnaires at term age, 3 months corrected age, 12 months corrected age, 24 months corrected age and 36 months corrected age. The research process and the study protocol have been published, see references below.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

130

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Danderyd, Sweden, 18288
        • Karolinska Hospital, Danderyds Sjukhus neonatalavdelning
      • Huddinge, Sweden, 14186
        • Karolinska Hospital Huddinge, neontalavdelningen
      • Solna, Sweden, 171 76
        • Karolinska Hospital
      • Stockholm, Sweden, 10691
        • Stockholm University
      • Stockholm, Sweden, 11883
        • Södersjukhusets neonatalavdelning

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

7 months to 10 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • extremely premature born babies
  • close to discharge from their neonatal intensive care unit hospital stay at Stockholm county council (Stockholms Läns Landsting).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children with parent/parents who do not communicate in Swedish or English.
  • Patients not residing in Stockholm county.
  • Acute surgery patients who will spend a lot of time at hospitals far from Stockholm

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Stockholm Preterm Interaction-Based Intervention (SPIBI)
Home-based post-discharge intervention for extreme premature babies and their parents. The intervention consists of one hospital visit, nine home-visits and two telephone calls during the first year corrected age, specifically from one week before discharge to 12 months corrected age. The intervention is strengths-based working with the infant-parent interaction, supporting infant development and strengthening the parent in his/her role.
Post-discharge intervention to extreme premature infants and their parents
No Intervention: Control
The participants of the Control Group receives treatment as usual, which consists of a regular follow-up program with neurodevelopmental assessment at term age, 3 months corrected age, 12 months corrected age, 24 months corrected age and 66 months corrected age. Compared to children not participating in the study, the control group will receive an extended follow-up program, with assessment and questionnaires at term age, 3 months corrected age, 12 months corrected age, 24 months corrected age and 36 months corrected age. Participants in the control group will be referred to specialized care when needed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Parent-child interaction
Time Frame: 12 months corrected age.
Emotional availability scales, EAS The scale has four parental dimensions; sensitivity, structure, non-intrusiveness, non-hostility and two child dimensions; child responsiveness and child involvement. Each subscale has a maximum score of 29 and a direct score of 1-7. Hypothesis of higher scores in intervention group.
12 months corrected age.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Child's general development
Time Frame: 24 months corrected age
Bayley scales of infant and toddler development (third edition; Bayley-III), measuring cognition, language, and motor development. Composite scores are standardized to mean (SD) scores of 100 (15), based on age-matched normative data. Higher scores in intervention group
24 months corrected age
Child's executive function
Time Frame: 24 and 36 months corrected age
Behaviour Rating of Executive Function Parental version BRIEF-P. All the 5 subscales will be used. Hypothesis of less executive problems in intervention group.
24 and 36 months corrected age
Child's motor development 1
Time Frame: 3 months & 12 months corrected age
Alberta Infant Motor Scale, AIMS. Range 0 - 58 points, with a hypothesis of higher scores for intervention group
3 months & 12 months corrected age
Parental depression
Time Frame: Term age, 12, 24 and 36 months corrected age
Hospital anxiety and depression scale, HADS. Range depression subscale 0-21, range anxiety subscale 0-21. Hypothesis of lower scores in the intervention-parental group.
Term age, 12, 24 and 36 months corrected age
Parental anxiety
Time Frame: Term age, 12, 24 and 36 months corrected age
State/trait anxiety inventory, STAI. Maximum 80 points for the State-scale, and maximum 80 points for the trait-scale. Hypothesis of lower scores in the intervention-parental group
Term age, 12, 24 and 36 months corrected age
Parental self-efficacy
Time Frame: Term age, 12, 24 and 36 months corrected age
parental self-efficacy scale, PSE. PSE has 24 items at term age and 12 and 24 months and 48 items int he form for older ages, all items rated in a 0-10 scale. Hypothesis of higher score for intervention group at 12,24 and 36 months.
Term age, 12, 24 and 36 months corrected age
Parental resilience
Time Frame: Term age, 12, 24 and 36 months corrected age
Resilience scale, RES. RES is a 25-items scale with a 7-point Likert scale. Hypothesis of higher scores in the intervention group.
Term age, 12, 24 and 36 months corrected age

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Child's neurological development
Time Frame: 3 months, 12 months, 24 months corrected age, hypothesis of higher score for intervention group
Hammersmith infant neurological examination, range 0-78 with a hypothesis of higher scores in intervention group.
3 months, 12 months, 24 months corrected age, hypothesis of higher score for intervention group
Child's motor development 2
Time Frame: Term age & 12 months corrected age, hypothesis of higher score for intervention group
Peabody developmental motor scales, PDMS. Subscale Stationary: range 0-42, subscale Locomotion range 0-138, subscale Object Manipulation range 0-30, subscale Grasping range 0-44 and subscale Visual-Motor Integration range 0-113. Hypothesis of higher scores in intervention group.
Term age & 12 months corrected age, hypothesis of higher score for intervention group
Child's motor development 3
Time Frame: 3 months corrected age
General movement assessment, GMA, scale Normal-Absent Fidgety
3 months corrected age
Child's general development
Time Frame: 12 months, 24 months, 36 months corrected age, hypothesis that the parents of the intervention group scoring their children higher
Ages and stages questionnaire, ASQ-R. All five subscales Communication, Gross Motor, Fine Motor, Problem Solving, Personal-Social will be used, with a range from 0-300 all together. Hypothesis of higher scores in intervention group.
12 months, 24 months, 36 months corrected age, hypothesis that the parents of the intervention group scoring their children higher
Child's strengths and difficulties
Time Frame: 24 and 36 months corrected age, hypothesis of less difficulties and more strengths scored by parents in the intervention group
Strengths and difficulties questionnaire SDQ. 25 items on a 3-point scale, 5 questions of prosocial behaviour and 20 questions about various difficulties. Hypothesis of higher scores in the intervention group for prosocial behaviour and lower scores in the intervention group of the problematic subscales.
24 and 36 months corrected age, hypothesis of less difficulties and more strengths scored by parents in the intervention group
Child's autistic symptoms
Time Frame: 24 months corrected age
Modified checklist for autism in toddlers M-CHAT. Range 0-20 points, hypothesis of lower scores in intervention group.
24 months corrected age
Infant temperament
Time Frame: 12 months corrected age
Infant behavior questionnaire, IBQ-R. 37 items on a 7 point scale. Hypothesis of less problematic behaviour in intervention group, i.e. higher scores on subscales Smiling and Laughter and soothability; and lower scores on the subscales Fear and Distress to Limitations.
12 months corrected age
Parental satisfaction with the intervention
Time Frame: 12 months corrected age
Client satisfaction questionnaire, CSQ-8 & semi-structured interview. CSQ-8 has 8 items, and a range of 8-48 points.
12 months corrected age
Pre-school educators' view of the child's engagement in preschool
Time Frame: 24 and 36 months corrected age
Child Engagement Questionnaire (CEQ) Swedish version has 29 items rated on a 4 point scale and the summary score may range from 29 to 116 with higher scores indicating more positive engagement
24 and 36 months corrected age
Pre-school educators' view of the child's interaction in preschool
Time Frame: 24 and 36 months corrected age
Swedish questionnaire Ert Barn Vårt Samspel, has 36 items rated on a 5 points scale and the summary score may range from 36 to 180 with higher scores indicating more interactive behavior
24 and 36 months corrected age
Pre-school educators' view of the child's playtime in preschool
Time Frame: 24 and 36 months corrected age
Play time / Social Time Teacher Impression Scale. 16 items 1-5 Likert scale (min 16- max 80) higher scores indicating more social skills and play behavior
24 and 36 months corrected age
Pre-school educators' view of the child in preschool
Time Frame: 24 or 36 months corrected age, depending on when the child has entered preschool
Semi-structured preschool teacher interview
24 or 36 months corrected age, depending on when the child has entered preschool
Pre-school educators' view of the child's level of function in preschool
Time Frame: 24 and 36 months corrected age
ICF-CY core sets. 12 items in Body functions (rated 0-9) and 22 items (rated 0-9) in Activities and Participation; higher scores indicate disability or developmental delay. 20 items covering Environmental factors (between +4 and +1 for facilitators; 0-9 for barriers) measure included to identify possible disability and environmental moderators.
24 and 36 months corrected age
Parent-child interaction long-term
Time Frame: 24 months corrected age
Emotional availability scales, EAS The scale has four parental dimensions; sensitivity, structure, non-intrusiveness, non-hostility and two child dimensions; child responsiveness and child involvement. Each subscale has a maximum score of 29 and a direct score of 1-7. Hypothesis of higher scores in intervention group.
24 months corrected age

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 3, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 22, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Extreme Prematurity

3
Subscribe