Evaluation of the Efficacy for Sentinel Lymph Node Policy in High-risk Endometrial Carcinoma

June 21, 2020 updated by: Xiaojun Chen, Fudan University
To evaluate the efficacy of sentinel lymph node biopsy technique in patients with high-risk endometrial carcinoma, which provides the evidence that sentinel lymph node biopsy technique could substitute the systematic Lymph node dissection(LND).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial carcinoma(EC) is an indisputable staging and prognostic tool. The staging procedure includes total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and lymphadenectomy, omental biopsy if necessary. Since lymph node metastasis is one of the most important risk factors of prognosis. The dissection of lymph nodes has been used for staging, prognostic information, and to determine the need for adjuvant therapy. The approach to lymph node evaluation in women with EC is still a subject of debate. Practice varies across different institutions or surgeons. In general, the options for management of retroperitoneal lymph nodes include no lymph node dissection (LND), systematic LND only if the risk of lymph node metastasis exceeds a certain threshold, or routine sentinel LND following lymphatic mapping. lymphadenectomy is significantly associated with longer operating time, higher surgical costs, greater rate of infection, as well as the occurrence of lymphocysts and lymphedema, moreover, there is lack of evidence of a therapeutic benefit of LND, less invasive techniques have emerged as possible alternatives. The technique for lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) in EC has been refined and found a low false-negative rate for detection of positive lymph nodes. The 2018 National Comprehensive cancer Network (NCCN) guideline of uterus cancer states SLN mapping can be considered for the surgical staging of apparent uterine-confined malignancy when there is no metastasis demonstrated by imaging studies or no obvious extrauterine disease at exploration. It indicates low-risk patients could avoid those side effects of the systematic Lymph node dissection. Whether high-risk patients (grade 3, deep myometrial invasion, non-endometrioid endometrial cancer, and Cervical invasion) can be benefited from this technique? This prospective cohort study is designed to To evaluate the efficacy of sentinel lymph node biopsy technique in patients with high-risk endometrial carcinoma. Surgery should be performed within a maximum of 4 weeks from the patient's first consultation.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

78

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Shanghai, China
        • Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients aged 18-100 years old with high-risk endometrial carcinoma (grade 3 endometroid endometrial cancer, deep myometrial invasion, non-endometrioid endometrial cancer, and Cervical invasion (in intraoperative frozen section examinations) and without no contraindication to surgery will be recruited.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age: 18~100 years.
  2. No contraindication to surgery.
  3. Signed and dated informed consent.
  4. high-risk endometrial cancer with grade 3, deep myometrial invasion, non-endometrioid endometrial cancer, and Cervical invasion (in intraoperative frozen section examinations).
  5. With any suspicious pelvic, para-aortic or distant lymph node metastasis in preoperative imaging tests including MRI/CT/positron emission computed tomography(PET)-CT.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Low-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer with grade 1-2, superficial myometrial invasion and tumor diameter < 2cm (in intraoperative frozen section examinations).
  2. Intermediate-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer with grade 1-2, superficial myometrial invasion and tumor diameter ≥ 2cm (in intraoperative frozen section examinations).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental SLN arm

Experimental SLN arm

  1. Intra-operative sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping with indocyanine green injected into the stroma of the cervix.
  2. Full bilateral laparoscopic lymphadenectomy and hysterectomy:

If bilateral SLN are detected, all positive SLN will be removed. Then the surgeons proceed to a total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and lymphadenectomy including complete pelvic lymphadenectomy and aortic lymph node dissection.

If only unilateral SLN or non SLN are detected, surgeons will proceed to complete pelvic lymphadenectomy and aortic lymph node dissection.

Intra-operative SLN mapping with indocyanine green: Intracervical injection will be performed by the surgeon. Sub-mucous injections will be performed with 50% diluted dye at 3 and 9 o'clock positions. 1ml injection contained infracyanine green will be injected deeply into the stroma of the cervix (1cm-depth), and Arms Assigned Interventions another 1ml will be injected superficially (2mm-depth).

The time between the injection and the search for SLN must be as soon as possible.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Performance Analysis
Time Frame: Within 14 days after the surgery
Using the final pathological diagnosis as the Gold Standard, the investigators will calculate the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracy of mapping and detection of SLN with metastatic disease.
Within 14 days after the surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative complications
Time Frame: 1 years after the surgery
calculate the incidence of complications such as lymph cysts, lymph edema, and postoperative fever etc.
1 years after the surgery
Recurrence rate
Time Frame: 5 years after the surgery
The recurrence rate will be followed up.
5 years after the surgery
Adjuvant therapy rate
Time Frame: 5 years after the surgery
The adjuvant therapy rate will be followed up.
5 years after the surgery
5-year survival rate
Time Frame: 5 years after the surgery
The 5-year survival rate will be followed up.
5 years after the surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Chao Wang, Ph.D., Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University
  • Principal Investigator: Xuezhen Luo, Ph.D., Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University
  • Study Chair: Xiaojun Chen, Ph.D., Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 16, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

February 16, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 21, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 23, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 23, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 21, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Endometrial Adenocarcinoma

Clinical Trials on SLN mapping

3
Subscribe