Factors Increasing Air Burden in Intravenous Tubing

October 26, 2018 updated by: ClearLine MD

A Prospective Observational Study of Air Burden in Intravenous Tubing: Factors That Increase Patient Risk

There is widespread acceptance that air in intravenous (IV) fluid tubing (lines) can pose a significant risk to patients.1 A rigorous literature search regarding sources of this air identified only anecdotal and non-clinical work regarding the presence and sources of air in IV tubing. Most published case studies have focused on air entrainment from accidental or inadvertent sources - empty IV fluid bags, incomplete priming of the tubing prior to infusion, and air-detection device failures, as examples.

The sources (and volume) of air inside IV tubing during common surgical procedures or interventions have yet to be studied prospectively. Understanding the frequency and magnitude of the presence of unintended air in IV tubing is the first step in devising potential avoidance strategies for eliminating unintended air in IV tubing. This study was designed to identify both the sources and magnitude of air that occurs in IV tubing during routine surgical procedures.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Methods:

An observational prospective trial was conducted in operating room settings across multiple study sites. 120 surgical patients undergoing a variety of interventional and surgical procedures were selected, representing multiple patient populations, case types and anesthesia setups. The ClearLine IV, a device that detects and removes air from IV tubing, was inserted into the IV circuit. Clinicians followed standard protocols. Blood warmers were used at the practitioner's discretion. IV fluid was administered at a constant flow rate or through a bolus given over 30-60 seconds per standard of care. The volume and duration of fluid administration was recorded, along with the frequency, duration and amount of air captured by ClearLine IV.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any age - both pediatric and adult
  • Weight equal to or greater than 5kg
  • Surgical procedures
  • Cardiac catherization procedures
  • Minimum two hours procedure time

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient weight less than 5 kg
  • Procedures not involving surgery or cardiac catherization
  • Procedures less than two hours

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Single Arm post-approval study
Single Arm post-approval study.
Patient safety device that automatically and continuously detects and actively removes air from IV lines - protecting patients from dangerous air burden, air embolism, air infusions.
Other Names:
  • AirPurge

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The frequency of air removed from intravenous tubing by ClearLine IV
Time Frame: 1 year
The ClearLine IV data monitor measures the frequency (# of air masses) of air removed from IV lines
1 year
The amount of air removed from intravenous tubing by ClearLine IV
Time Frame: 1 year
The ClearLine IV data monitor measures the amount (mL) of air removed from IV lines
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christopher Tirotta, MD, Nicklaus Children's Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Jonathan Ho, MD, Johns Hopkins University
  • Principal Investigator: Davinder Ramsingh, MD, Loma Linda Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 16, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 21, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 21, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 24, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 29, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 29, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CLMD_CT_001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Air Leakage

Clinical Trials on ClearLine IV (formerly, AirPurge)

3
Subscribe