Effect of Using Nanochitosan Versus Calcium Hydroxide as Disinfectant on Pain and Apical Bone Healing

October 31, 2018 updated by: ahmed abdelmonam abd elmougoud, Cairo University

Effect of Using Nanochitosan Versus Calcium Hydroxide as Intracanal Medications on the Postoperative Pain and Apical Bone Healing

Effect of Using Nanochitosan versus Calcium Hydroxide as Intracanal Medications on the Postoperative Pain and Apical Bone Healing

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Detailed Description

PICO approach P (population): maxillary anterior teeth having necrotic pulp with symptomatic apical periodontitis with evidence of apical radiolucency (minimum size 2 mm x 2 mm).

I (intervention):0.2% nanochitosan as intracanal medication. C (control): calcium hydroxide paste intracanal medication.

O (outcome):

Primary outcome: postoperative pain at time interval 4, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours

Secondary outcome:

  1. Postoperative pain, swelling, palpation, percussion and mobility at one week, 3, 6, 12 months
  2. Number of analgesic tablets used at 4, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours and one week.
  3. healing of apical periodontitis using CBCT at 3, 6, 12 months

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Patients in good general health.
  • Patient's age ranging between 20-40 years with no sex predilection.
  • Maxillary anterior teeth with non-vital pulp and symptomatic apical periodontitis.
  • Evidence of apical radiolucency (minimum size 2 mm x 2 mm).
  • Patients' acceptance to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Medically compromised patients with a severe systemic condition.
  • Pregnant female patients.
  • Patients who had taken any antibiotic or analgesics during the past 24 hours.
  • Presence of a swelling because emergency management may include incision and drainage.
  • Retreatment cases.
  • Generalized periodontitis (calculus, deep pockets).
  • Out of normal variations (open apex- severely curved canal- obstructed canal).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: chitosan
chitosan as intracanal medication 0.2% in form of gel
chitosan will be used as intracanal medication
Active Comparator: calcium hydroxide
intracanal medication
intracanal medication
Other Names:
  • CaOH

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in postoperative pain after intervention of chitosan: NRS
Time Frame: 4,12,24,27 hours
pain assessed by numerical rating scale, pain will be assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS) which is proven to be a simple, valid, and a reliable pain measurement tool. The NRS consists of a series of numbers from zero to 10 with the end-points representing the extremes of pain as "no pain" and "the worst possible pain". Patients will rank their pain level by making a mark on the number they thought it represented their pain. The pain intensity is assigned into four categorical scores: 1, no pain (score 0); 2, mild (scores 1-3); 3, moderate (scores 4-6); 4, severe (scores 7-10). Pain is evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively after the initial visit at 4, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours
4,12,24,27 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in healing of apical periodontitis
Time Frame: 3,6,12 months
linear measurment of apical radiolucency using cone beam computed tomography
3,6,12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

October 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 24, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 29, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 30, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 1, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Chitosan

3
Subscribe