Feasibility of Constraint-induced Therapy Combined With Visual-spatial Cueing Strategy in Patients With Acute Stroke (ITHEMICAL)

December 14, 2020 updated by: Nantes University Hospital

Feasibility of Modified Constraint-induced Movement Therapy Combined With Visual-spatial Cueing Strategy in Patients With Acute Stroke

The aim of this study is to test the feasibility of a constraint intervention combined with visual-spatial cueing strategy in patients with acute stroke to improve their daily life activities.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Detailed Description

As part of treatment in acute stroke (from D0 to D14), the investigators were able to observe that despite motor recovery during physiotherapy sessions, it remained difficult for some patients to use their affected arm (AA) during activities of daily life (ADL). This mechanism of "learned non-use" would be due to a cognitive process decreasing the use of the AA and could partly explain that 75% of patients maintain an upper limb deficit at 3-6 month post-stroke.

In order to combat this phenomenon, a bottom up method (sensorimotor action on the deficit) of constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) has been developed and consists in immobilizing the unaffected arm to force the use of the AA.

This technique has proved its effectiveness in the chronic phase and has also recently been proven to improve motor performance in the acute phase. Transposing progress on ADL, however, remains difficult because CIMT does not contain adequate behavioral strategies.

To help the patient mobilize these strategies, coupling of CIMT with a top-down method (conscious action on motor skills) has been successfully tested as an intervention of an occupational therapist with the patient at least 1h / day. This intervention remains not compatible with the investigators care organization because the caregiver can not spend that amount of time with each patient.

Investigators therefore propose to associate CIMT with another top down technique: visual-spatial cueing (use of panels and/or visual messages to encourage the conscious use of the AA) and investigators want to evaluate the effectiveness of this treatment on learning transfer to ADL.

The objective of our study will be to test the feasibility of setting up such an intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

8

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nantes, France, 44093
        • Service de Neurologie, CHU Nantes

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Hospitalized patient in neurovascular unit for stroke
  • Time since stroke between 2 and 4 days
  • Movement capacity of the upper arm (against gravity) :
  • Ability to extend actively the metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joints at least 10°, and the wrist 20°
  • Ability to bend actively the elbow at least 45°
  • Ability to bend and abduct actively the shoulder at least ≥ 45°
  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Patient agreement to join the study
  • Patient covered by french social security

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Excessive spasticity : score > 2 on the modified Ashworth scale
  • Excessive pain in the affected arm : score ≥ 4 on the visual analogue scale
  • Joint limitation on the affected arm
  • Patient under guardianship or curatorship
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Constraint-induced movement therapy

Patient's unaffected arm is restrained, by a glove including thumb, during activities of daily life (bathing, grooming, dressing and feeding = approx. 4h/day).

Visual spatial cueing is displayed in the bedroom and the bathroom.

Patient's unaffected arm is restrained, by a glove including thumb, during activities of daily life (bathing, grooming, dressing and feeding = approx. 4h/day).

Visual spatial cueing is displayed in the bedroom and the bathroom.

Other Names:
  • Visual-spatial cueing : top down
No Intervention: Usual care
Usual care of the neurovascular unit. = No constraint, no cueing, and same physiotherapy intervention as experimental arm.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of tasks realized per protocol between the two arms
Time Frame: Day 15
Variances to a predetermined checklist
Day 15

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Arm motor function
Time Frame: Day 0, Day 15 and Month 3
Action Research Arm Test
Day 0, Day 15 and Month 3
Pain evolution
Time Frame: Day 0, Day 7, Day 15 and Month 3
Use of Visual analogue scale to determine the degree of pain on a scale from 0 to 10 (0: meaning no pain, 10 being maximal tolerable pain)
Day 0, Day 7, Day 15 and Month 3
Anxiety and Depression evolution
Time Frame: Day 0, Day 7, Day 15 and Month 3
Use of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. This scale has 14 items in total, 7 items for Anxiety and 7 for Depression. Each item is rated from 0 to 3. score of 0 meaning normal, score 3 meaning abnormal.
Day 0, Day 7, Day 15 and Month 3
Situation of patient after neurovascular unit
Time Frame: Month 3
Indication of patient 's situation at the end of the study: either Rehabilitation center, Nursing homes, Home or Other
Month 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ambre Komonski, CHU Nantes

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 18, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 12, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

February 12, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 27, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 16, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 14, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Stroke

Clinical Trials on Constraint-induced movement therapy

3
Subscribe