Evaluation of Triage Options After HPV Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening Among HIV-infected Women (AIMA-CC)

February 15, 2022 updated by: ANRS, Emerging Infectious Diseases

Evaluation of Screening Algorithms Based on Self-collection and HPV Testing With Partial Genotyping for the Prevention of Cervical Cancer Among HIV-infected Women in Low-income Countries

Cervical cancer is the most common cause of cancer and a leading cause of death among HIV-infected women living in resource-limited settings. Although screening for premalignant lesions is an effective way of reducing cervical cancer incidence, its uptake in low-resource settings to date is low. The use of HPV testing for primary screening is currently recommended by many guidelines - including the WHO guidelines for cervical cancer screening in resource-limited settings - because of its greater sensitivity and ease of use compared to other options. However, these WHO guidelines have both highlighted the need to conduct more research on appropriate HPV-based algorithms among HIV-infected women, as immunodeficiency may affect the screening performance. Indeed, HPV infections in HIV-infected women are very common, so there is a need for additional triage to identify women most at risk and there remains considerable uncertainty on the optimal option for such triage. Most of the evidence available comes from HIV-negative populations living in high-resource settings and is not necessarily relevant for low-resource contexts where the epidemiological background is different, women access late to screening and may not have follow up visits, where financial constraints are important and health service resources limited.

Hence, the proposed project aims to provide evidence on the effectiveness and feasibility of HPV-based screening algorithms among HIV-infected women in low-resource settings.

This multicenter cross-sectional study will include 3,000 HIV-infected women (30-49 years old) receiving HAART and followed in Abidjan (Ivory Coast), Bobo-Dioulasso (Burkina Faso) and Phnom Penh (Cambodia).

After self-collection of cervico-vaginal samples, each participant will have an HPV test with partial genotyping primary using the Xpert HPV assay, a real-time PCR assay that provides the possibility of identifying 14 HR-HPV types within one hour. The Xpert HPV test has been chosen because of the wide availability of the Genexpert platform in HIV care centers from resource-limited settings. Furthermore, it can specifically detect HPV-16, 18 and 45, the most carcinogenic HPV types in both HIV-negative and HIV-positive women, separately from other high-risk HPV types. VIA will be another triage option either alone or combined to HPV DNA genotyping.

In addition, participants treated for cervical lesion will be followed over 12 months to assess the risk of post-treatment lesions (CIN2+/HSIL) and to identify associated risk-factors.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

3000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso
        • Recruiting
        • HIV day care center
        • Contact:
          • Armel Poda
      • Phnom Penh, Cambodia
        • Recruiting
        • Calmette Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Kim Sothea
      • Abidjan, Côte D'Ivoire
        • Enrolling by invitation
        • CEPREF

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 49 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women
  • HIV-1 infection
  • Age 30 to 49 years
  • In care for HIV infection, receiving or initiating antiretroviral therapy
  • Written informed consent given

Exclusion Criteria:

  • HIV-2 infection
  • Ongoing pregnancy (evidenced by self-report or clinical examination)
  • Previous total hysterectomy
  • Severe concomitant disease that, according to the investigators, may contraindicate or compromise participation to the study
  • History of cervical cancer screening with treatment for precancerous lesions within the last 12 months

Differed inclusion

  • Ongoing heavy menstruation
  • Immediate post-partum (<12 weeks post delivery)
  • Sign of ongoing genital infection (e.g. mucopurulante discharge)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SCREENING
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: Triage with different options

All women will have an HPV test, partial genotyping (16/18/45 versus other high-risk HPV [hr-HPV]) and VIA. The different options for triage that will be compared are:

  • Participants hr-HVP+ and VIA+ participants selected for treatment;
  • Participants HPV 16/18/45+ selected for treatment;
  • Participant HPV 16/18/45+ and/or VIA+ selected for treatment;
HPV testing with the GenXpert platform VIA Biopsies of VIA+ lesions or random Treatment with thermal ablation of women with precancerous lesions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity of the triage options
Time Frame: Day 0
Sensitivity of the triage options to detect CIN2+ and CIN3+ lesions with histology as the reference standard
Day 0
Specificity of the triage options
Time Frame: Day 0
Specificity of the triage options to detect CIN2+ and CIN3+ lesions with histology as the reference standard
Day 0

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) of the triage options
Time Frame: Day 0
PPV and NPV of the triage options to detect CIN2+ and CIN3+ lesions with histology as the reference standard
Day 0
Positive and negative diagnostic likelihood ratio (DLR) of the triage options
Time Frame: Day 0
Positive and negative DLR of the triage options to detect CIN2+ and CIN3+ lesions with histology as the reference standard
Day 0
Acceptability and feasibility
Time Frame: Day 0 and Week 1
Acceptability and feasibility of the self-sampling, of the different triage options and of the treatment cervical lesions
Day 0 and Week 1
Prevalence of CIN2+ lesions
Time Frame: Day 0
Prevalence of CIN2 lesions, overall and by sub-groups defined by age categories, current CD4-cell count, nadir CD4-cell count and treatment history
Day 0
Prevalence of CIN3+ lesions
Time Frame: Day 0
Prevalence of CIN3 lesions overall and by sub-groups defined by age categories, current CD4-cell count, nadir CD4-cell count and treatment history
Day 0
Prevalence of cervical cancer
Time Frame: Day 0
Prevalence of cervical cancer overall and by sub-groups defined by age categories, current CD4-cell count, nadir CD4-cell count and treatment history
Day 0
Adverse events
Time Frame: Day 0 and Week 1 up to 24 weeks
Rate and nature of adverse events and protocol violations
Day 0 and Week 1 up to 24 weeks
Proportion of the women eligible to HPV screening who were actually screened and treated (if required)
Time Frame: Day 0
Proportion of the women eligible for the study who were actually screened, treated (if required)
Day 0
Evaluation of the micro-costing
Time Frame: Day 0 up to Week 26
Evaluation of the micro-costing of the various components of the screening strategies
Day 0 up to Week 26
Evaluation of post-treatment HPV clearance
Time Frame: Week 24 and 48 post treatment
Evaluation of the HPV clearance at M6 and M12 after thermal-ablation
Week 24 and 48 post treatment
Evaluation of post-treatment cervical lesion
Time Frame: Week 48 post treatment
Evaluation of the proportion of CIN2 and CIN3 at M12 after treatment
Week 48 post treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Pierre Debeaudrap, PhD, CEPED - UMR196
  • Study Director: Apollinaire Debeaudrap, PhD, PACCI - Ivory Coast

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 3, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 27, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 28, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 16, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV Infections

Clinical Trials on HPV test with partial genotyping and VIA triage

3
Subscribe