FMT in Cirrhosis and Hepatic Encephalopathy

December 21, 2023 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

Fecal Microbiota Transplant in Veterans With Cirrhosis

Patients with end stage of liver disease or cirrhosis can develop confusion due to high ammonia and inflammation. This confusion is brought upon by changes in the bacteria in the bowels and may not respond to current standard of care treatments. Repeated episodes of confusion can make it difficult for patients to function and may result in multiple admissions to the hospital and burden on the family. The investigators have studied using a healthy person's stool to replace the bowel bacteria, called fecal microbial transplant, in small studies with good results. In this trial the investigators propose to perform these procedures using an upper and lower route in Veterans who suffer from this condition and follow them for safety and HE and related hospitalizations over 6 months. The investigators will compare this to placebo treatments and hope that this intervention can improve the health and daily functioning of affected patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Indication: Cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy

Study Objectives: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of fecal transplant in patients with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy

Rationale and Supporting Evidence:

Hepatic encephalopathy affects 30-45% of patients with cirrhosis and adversely affects survival in these patients. The mainstay of treatment for hepatic encephalopathy (HE) has long been the manipulation of the gut flora through antibiotics, prebiotics or probiotics. The current first and second line therapies for HE in the US are lactulose and rifaximin respectively that uniquely act within the confines of the gut lumen with encouraging clinical results. However, there is a subset of patients with HE that continues to recur despite being on both treatments. This patient group is at a higher risk of poor outcomes because HE has now been removed from liver transplant priority and multiple episodes of HE can result in cumulative brain injury which may be irreversible. Therefore, the prevention of recurrent HE is an important therapeutic goal.

The investigators' group and other reports have shown that patients with HE and cirrhosis are more likely to have overgrowth of potentially pathogenic bacterial taxa such as Enterobacteriaceae and reduction of autochthonous species such as Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae in the stool and the colonic mucosa. This has been linked to poor performance on cognitive tests that are a hallmark of HE and with increased systemic inflammation in these patients.

Therefore, a gut-based therapeutic option that can potentially improve the recurrence rate and the overall prognosis is needed. Fecal transplant has been shown to be effective in conditions with predominant gut-bacterial overgrowth or alteration such as recurrent Clostridium difficile and inflammatory bowel disease. Safe protocols have been developed across the world and studies are being performed in the US under FDA-monitored INDs. Limitations to performing fecal transplant include identifying and screening appropriate donors, which is time consuming and costly, with the cost typically falling to the patient or donor as the required screening is generally not covered by insurance.

The investigators' preliminary data suggest that a one-time administration of an FMT-enema using a rationally-selected donor is safe in patients with cirrhosis and recurrent HE. However, given the small bowel overgrowth and the predominantly small bowel location for bacterial translocation in cirrhosis, which is out of the reach of an enema, an upper GI route for FMT needs to be explored. In the investigators' published experience, a single enema from a rationally-derived donor was associated with significantly lower total and HE-related hospitalizations compared to patients who were randomized to standard of care, with a stable long-term course over >1 year. The investigators' data show that FMT was associated with favorable changes in fecal bile acid (BA) profile with a decrease in proportions of fecal secondary BAs, conjugated BAs and increase in sulfated BAs, indicating a healthier milieu. The investigators also have preliminary data defining the safety of oral FMT capsules in patients with cirrhosis and HE in a current trial led by us. The use of combined oral and rectal routes of FMT, which can potentially alleviate both small bowel and colonic translocation are likely to be better than either alone.

Overall aim: To determine the effect of dual oral and rectal administration of FMT from a rational donor on clinical outcomes (HE and related hospitalizations, brain function, quality of life) and host-microbiota interactions (microbial composition and bile acid composition with systemic and intestinal inflammation), compared to single route of administration and placebo, along with a second oral capsular FMT vs placebo administration in patients with cirrhosis and HE using a randomized, phase II clinical trial.

Design overview: Four groups of outpatients with cirrhosis will be randomized using random sequence generator into placebo and FMT groups and followed for 6 months under an FDA IND double-blind clinical trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Virginia
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23249-0001
        • Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Cirrhosis diagnosed by either of the following in a patient with chronic liver disease

    • Liver Biopsy
    • Radiologic evidence of varices, cirrhosis or portal hypertension
    • Laboratory evidence of platelet count <100,000 or AST/ALT ratio>1
    • Endoscopic evidence of varices or portal gastropathy
    • Fibroscan values suggestive of cirrhosis
  • On treatment for hepatic encephalopathy (patient can be on lactulose and rifaximin)
  • Able to give written, informed consent (demonstrated by mini-mental status exam>25 at the time of consenting)
  • Women of child bearing potential must agree to use effective contraception for the duration of the study and for 10 days prior and 30 days after the study
  • Negative pregnancy test in women of childbearing age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • MELD score >22
  • WBC count <1000 cells/mm3
  • Platelet count<25,000/mm3
  • TIPS in place for less than a month
  • Currently on antibiotics apart from rifaximin
  • Infection at the time of the FMT (diagnosed by blood culture positivity, urinalysis, paracentesis as needed)
  • Hospitalization for any non-elective cause within the last 1 month
  • Patients who are pregnant or nursing (will be checked using a urine pregnancy test)
  • Patients who are incarcerated
  • Patients who are incapable of giving their own informed consent
  • Patients who are immuno-compromised due to the following reasons:

    • HIV infection (any CD4 count)
    • Inherited/primary immune disorders
    • Current or recent (<3 mos) treatment with anti-neoplastic agent
    • Current or recent (<3 mos) treatment with any immunosuppressant medications [including but not limited to monoclonal antibodies to B and T cells, anti-TNF agents, glucocorticoids, antimetabolites (azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine), calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus, cyclosporine), mycophenolate mofetil].

      • Subjects who are otherwise immunocompetent and have discontinued any immunosuppressant medications 3 or more months prior to enrollment may be eligible to enroll
  • Patients on renal replacement therapy
  • Patients with untreated, in-situ colorectal cancer
  • Patients with a history of chronic intrinsic GI diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease

    • ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease or microscopic colitis

      • eosinophilic gastroenteritis or celiac disease
  • Major gastro-intestinal or intra-abdominal surgery in the last three months

Other Exclusion Criteria:

  • Enema-related

    • Platelet count<25,000
    • Grade IV hemorrhoids
  • Safety-related:

    • Dysphagia
    • History of aspiration, gastroparesis, intestinal obstruction
    • Ongoing antibiotic use (except for Rifaximin)
    • Severe anaphylactic food allergy
    • Allergy to ingredients Generally Recognized As Safe in the FMT capsules (glycerol, sodium chloride, hypromellose, gellan gum, titanium dioxide, theobroma oil)
    • Adverse event attributable to prior FMT
    • ASA Class IV or V
    • Pregnant or nursing patients
    • Acute illness or fever within 48 hours of the day of planned FMT
    • Immunocompromised due to medical conditions
    • Probiotics use within the last 48 hours of the day of planned FMT
    • Any condition that the physician investigators deem unsafe, including other conditions or medications that the investigator determines puts the participant at greater risk from FMT

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Oral and rectal placebo at visit 2 Oral placebo at day 30
Placebo
Active Comparator: Group 3: Oral placebo and rectal FMT
Oral placebo and rectal FMT at visit 2 Oral placebo at day 30
Placebo
FMT enema
Active Comparator: Group 2: Oral FMT and rectal placebo
Oral FMT and rectal placebo at visit 2 Oral FMT at day 30
Oral capsules of FMT
Experimental: Group 1: Dual Oral and rectal FMT
Dual Oral and rectal FMT at visit 2 Oral FMT at day 30
FMT enema
Oral capsules of FMT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Serious adverse events related to FMT
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of serious adverse events between groups related to FMT, especially related to HE
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse events related to FMT
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of adverse events that do not fit the criteria of serious adverse events between groups related to FMT
6 months
Change in microbial diversity in stool
Time Frame: 6 months
Shannon diversity index compared to baseline and engraftment related to the donor at baseline, within 30 days and then monthly till 6 months. Ranges usually from 0-10
6 months
Sickness Impact Profile change
Time Frame: 30 days and 6 months
Quality of life assessment change defined by Sickness Impact Profile total score at 30 days and 6 months between groups. This is a percentage result ranges usually from 0-100
30 days and 6 months
EncephalApp performance change
Time Frame: 30 days, 60 days and 6 months
Cognitive assessment change using the OffTime+OnTime in seconds between groups at 30 days, 60 days and 6 months
30 days, 60 days and 6 months
Psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES) change
Time Frame: 30 days, 60 days and 6 months
Cognitive assessment change using the total PHES score between groups at 30 days, 60 days and 6 months. This ranges from -15 to +5
30 days, 60 days and 6 months
Change in microbial diversity in saliva
Time Frame: 6 months
Shannon diversity index compared to baseline at 30 days and then monthly till 6 months. Ranges usually from 0-10
6 months
HE related events
Time Frame: 6 months
Hepatic encephalopathy related events
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jasmohan S. Bajaj, MD MS, Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 29, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 19, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 3, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

January 8, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatic Encephalopathy

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe