- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03796598
FMT in Cirrhosis and Hepatic Encephalopathy
Fecal Microbiota Transplant in Veterans With Cirrhosis
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Indication: Cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy
Study Objectives: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of fecal transplant in patients with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy
Rationale and Supporting Evidence:
Hepatic encephalopathy affects 30-45% of patients with cirrhosis and adversely affects survival in these patients. The mainstay of treatment for hepatic encephalopathy (HE) has long been the manipulation of the gut flora through antibiotics, prebiotics or probiotics. The current first and second line therapies for HE in the US are lactulose and rifaximin respectively that uniquely act within the confines of the gut lumen with encouraging clinical results. However, there is a subset of patients with HE that continues to recur despite being on both treatments. This patient group is at a higher risk of poor outcomes because HE has now been removed from liver transplant priority and multiple episodes of HE can result in cumulative brain injury which may be irreversible. Therefore, the prevention of recurrent HE is an important therapeutic goal.
The investigators' group and other reports have shown that patients with HE and cirrhosis are more likely to have overgrowth of potentially pathogenic bacterial taxa such as Enterobacteriaceae and reduction of autochthonous species such as Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae in the stool and the colonic mucosa. This has been linked to poor performance on cognitive tests that are a hallmark of HE and with increased systemic inflammation in these patients.
Therefore, a gut-based therapeutic option that can potentially improve the recurrence rate and the overall prognosis is needed. Fecal transplant has been shown to be effective in conditions with predominant gut-bacterial overgrowth or alteration such as recurrent Clostridium difficile and inflammatory bowel disease. Safe protocols have been developed across the world and studies are being performed in the US under FDA-monitored INDs. Limitations to performing fecal transplant include identifying and screening appropriate donors, which is time consuming and costly, with the cost typically falling to the patient or donor as the required screening is generally not covered by insurance.
The investigators' preliminary data suggest that a one-time administration of an FMT-enema using a rationally-selected donor is safe in patients with cirrhosis and recurrent HE. However, given the small bowel overgrowth and the predominantly small bowel location for bacterial translocation in cirrhosis, which is out of the reach of an enema, an upper GI route for FMT needs to be explored. In the investigators' published experience, a single enema from a rationally-derived donor was associated with significantly lower total and HE-related hospitalizations compared to patients who were randomized to standard of care, with a stable long-term course over >1 year. The investigators' data show that FMT was associated with favorable changes in fecal bile acid (BA) profile with a decrease in proportions of fecal secondary BAs, conjugated BAs and increase in sulfated BAs, indicating a healthier milieu. The investigators also have preliminary data defining the safety of oral FMT capsules in patients with cirrhosis and HE in a current trial led by us. The use of combined oral and rectal routes of FMT, which can potentially alleviate both small bowel and colonic translocation are likely to be better than either alone.
Overall aim: To determine the effect of dual oral and rectal administration of FMT from a rational donor on clinical outcomes (HE and related hospitalizations, brain function, quality of life) and host-microbiota interactions (microbial composition and bile acid composition with systemic and intestinal inflammation), compared to single route of administration and placebo, along with a second oral capsular FMT vs placebo administration in patients with cirrhosis and HE using a randomized, phase II clinical trial.
Design overview: Four groups of outpatients with cirrhosis will be randomized using random sequence generator into placebo and FMT groups and followed for 6 months under an FDA IND double-blind clinical trial.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Virginia
-
Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23249-0001
- Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Cirrhosis diagnosed by either of the following in a patient with chronic liver disease
- Liver Biopsy
- Radiologic evidence of varices, cirrhosis or portal hypertension
- Laboratory evidence of platelet count <100,000 or AST/ALT ratio>1
- Endoscopic evidence of varices or portal gastropathy
- Fibroscan values suggestive of cirrhosis
- On treatment for hepatic encephalopathy (patient can be on lactulose and rifaximin)
- Able to give written, informed consent (demonstrated by mini-mental status exam>25 at the time of consenting)
- Women of child bearing potential must agree to use effective contraception for the duration of the study and for 10 days prior and 30 days after the study
- Negative pregnancy test in women of childbearing age
Exclusion Criteria:
- MELD score >22
- WBC count <1000 cells/mm3
- Platelet count<25,000/mm3
- TIPS in place for less than a month
- Currently on antibiotics apart from rifaximin
- Infection at the time of the FMT (diagnosed by blood culture positivity, urinalysis, paracentesis as needed)
- Hospitalization for any non-elective cause within the last 1 month
- Patients who are pregnant or nursing (will be checked using a urine pregnancy test)
- Patients who are incarcerated
- Patients who are incapable of giving their own informed consent
Patients who are immuno-compromised due to the following reasons:
- HIV infection (any CD4 count)
- Inherited/primary immune disorders
- Current or recent (<3 mos) treatment with anti-neoplastic agent
Current or recent (<3 mos) treatment with any immunosuppressant medications [including but not limited to monoclonal antibodies to B and T cells, anti-TNF agents, glucocorticoids, antimetabolites (azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine), calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus, cyclosporine), mycophenolate mofetil].
- Subjects who are otherwise immunocompetent and have discontinued any immunosuppressant medications 3 or more months prior to enrollment may be eligible to enroll
- Patients on renal replacement therapy
- Patients with untreated, in-situ colorectal cancer
Patients with a history of chronic intrinsic GI diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease
ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease or microscopic colitis
- eosinophilic gastroenteritis or celiac disease
- Major gastro-intestinal or intra-abdominal surgery in the last three months
Other Exclusion Criteria:
Enema-related
- Platelet count<25,000
- Grade IV hemorrhoids
Safety-related:
- Dysphagia
- History of aspiration, gastroparesis, intestinal obstruction
- Ongoing antibiotic use (except for Rifaximin)
- Severe anaphylactic food allergy
- Allergy to ingredients Generally Recognized As Safe in the FMT capsules (glycerol, sodium chloride, hypromellose, gellan gum, titanium dioxide, theobroma oil)
- Adverse event attributable to prior FMT
- ASA Class IV or V
- Pregnant or nursing patients
- Acute illness or fever within 48 hours of the day of planned FMT
- Immunocompromised due to medical conditions
- Probiotics use within the last 48 hours of the day of planned FMT
- Any condition that the physician investigators deem unsafe, including other conditions or medications that the investigator determines puts the participant at greater risk from FMT
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Oral and rectal placebo at visit 2 Oral placebo at day 30
|
Placebo
|
Active Comparator: Group 3: Oral placebo and rectal FMT
Oral placebo and rectal FMT at visit 2 Oral placebo at day 30
|
Placebo
FMT enema
|
Active Comparator: Group 2: Oral FMT and rectal placebo
Oral FMT and rectal placebo at visit 2 Oral FMT at day 30
|
Oral capsules of FMT
|
Experimental: Group 1: Dual Oral and rectal FMT
Dual Oral and rectal FMT at visit 2 Oral FMT at day 30
|
FMT enema
Oral capsules of FMT
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Serious adverse events related to FMT
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Number of serious adverse events between groups related to FMT, especially related to HE
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Adverse events related to FMT
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Number of adverse events that do not fit the criteria of serious adverse events between groups related to FMT
|
6 months
|
Change in microbial diversity in stool
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Shannon diversity index compared to baseline and engraftment related to the donor at baseline, within 30 days and then monthly till 6 months.
Ranges usually from 0-10
|
6 months
|
Sickness Impact Profile change
Time Frame: 30 days and 6 months
|
Quality of life assessment change defined by Sickness Impact Profile total score at 30 days and 6 months between groups.
This is a percentage result ranges usually from 0-100
|
30 days and 6 months
|
EncephalApp performance change
Time Frame: 30 days, 60 days and 6 months
|
Cognitive assessment change using the OffTime+OnTime in seconds between groups at 30 days, 60 days and 6 months
|
30 days, 60 days and 6 months
|
Psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES) change
Time Frame: 30 days, 60 days and 6 months
|
Cognitive assessment change using the total PHES score between groups at 30 days, 60 days and 6 months.
This ranges from -15 to +5
|
30 days, 60 days and 6 months
|
Change in microbial diversity in saliva
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Shannon diversity index compared to baseline at 30 days and then monthly till 6 months.
Ranges usually from 0-10
|
6 months
|
HE related events
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Hepatic encephalopathy related events
|
6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jasmohan S. Bajaj, MD MS, Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- GAST-001-18S
- CX001076 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Office of Research and Development, VA)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hepatic Encephalopathy
-
Jinnah Postgraduate Medical CentreNot yet recruitingHepatic Encephalopathy Stage 2 | Hepatic Encephalopathy Stage 3 | Hepatic Encephalopathy Stage 4Pakistan
-
Sherief Abd-ElsalamTanta UniversityUnknownEncephalopathy, HepaticEgypt
-
Hunter Holmes Mcguire Veteran Affairs Medical CenterInstituto Grifols, S.A.; McGuire Research InstituteCompletedHepatic Encephalopathy | Cirrhosis | Minimal Hepatic Encephalopathy | Covert Hepatic EncephalopathyUnited States
-
Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, IndiaWithdrawnRefractory Hepatic EncephalopathyIndia
-
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterUnknown
-
Aga Khan UniversityUnknownEncephalopathy, Hepatic | Hepatocerebral Encephalopathy | Portal-Systemic Encephalopathy | Encephalopathy, HepatocerebralPakistan
-
Consorci Sanitari de l'Alt Penedès i GarrafWithdrawn
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedMinimal Hepatic Encephalopathy
-
Mansoura UniversityCompletedMinimal Hepatic EncephalopathyEgypt
-
Shanghai Changzheng HospitalEnrolling by invitationHepatic Encephalopathy | Covert Hepatic EncephalopathyChina
Clinical Trials on Placebo
-
SamA Pharmaceutical Co., LtdUnknownAcute Bronchitis | Acute Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionKorea, Republic of
-
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedCannabis UseUnited States
-
AstraZenecaParexel; Spandauer Damm 130; 14050; Berlin, GermanyCompletedMale Subjects With Type II Diabetes (T2DM)Germany
-
Heptares Therapeutics LimitedCompletedPharmacokinetics | Safety IssuesUnited Kingdom
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveUnited Kingdom, Netherlands
-
ItalfarmacoCompletedBecker Muscular DystrophyNetherlands, Italy
-
Shijiazhuang Yiling Pharmaceutical Co. LtdXuanwu Hospital, BeijingCompleted
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedInfections, BacterialUnited States
-
West Penn Allegheny Health SystemCompletedAsthma | Allergic RhinitisUnited States