Non-invasive Ventilation vs Oxygen Therapy After Extubation Failure

Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Versus Oxygen Therapy in Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure After Extubation in a Intensive Care Unit

Non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) has not exhibited a reduction of reintubation after extubation failure compared to oxygen therapy. The reduction of reintubation with NIV versus oxygen therapy in patients with extubation failure was evaluated.

A clinical trial was conducted that included patients who underwent mechanical ventilation and developed acute respiratory failure after extubation. After extubation failure, thirty-three were assigned to NIV and thirty-two were assigned to oxygen therapy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients. Medical and surgical patients admitted to intensive care unit with 18 years of age or older in weaning from their first episode of mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours were included. Patients with structural neurological disorder, acute toxic-metabolic neurological encephalopathy with neurological deficit [estimated by a Glasgow Coma Score <14 points] at the time of weaning, neuromuscular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease receiving non-invasive ventilation, limitation of life support therapy during their admission, tracheostomized patients, spinal cord injuries, scheduled surgical procedure during the 48 hours following extubation, intensive care unit readmission, transfer to another centre or a contraindication to non-invasive ventilation were excluded.

Weaning protocol. The beginning of weaning was considered when patients were conscious, without pain, connected to mechanical ventilation in pressure support ventilation mode, fraction of inspired oxygen ≤0.5, positive end-expiratory pressure +5cmH20, dopamine ≤5 mcgr/kg/min or noradrenaline ≤0.2 mcgr/kg/min, temperature <38ºC and absence of metabolic acidosis. Weaning consisted of a spontaneous breathing trial, which is routinely performed in our unit with a T-tube connected to an oxygen source . The following conditions indicated a successful spontaneous breathing trial: oxygen partial pressure ≥60 mmHg or transcutaneous oxygen saturation>90% with fraction of inspired oxygen <0.5, carbon dioxide partial pressure <50 mmHg (or an increase <8 mmHg), pH >7.32, respiratory rate <35 bpm (or an increase <50%), heart rate <140 bpm (or an increase <20%), systolic blood pressure <180 mmHg, and absence of cardiac arrhythmias after a minimum period of 30-120 min. Once the test was completed, extubation and subsequent placement of a Venturi oxygen mask with 0.3-0.4 fraction of inspired oxygen was performed. The physician in charge was responsible for the process of removal of mechanical ventilation and subsequent extubation. In the case of T-tube test failure, the patient was reconnected to the ventilator. Patient who presented clinical deterioration within 48 hours after extubation (work of breathing, use of accessory muscles, paradoxical breathing) and/or respiratory-gasometric deterioration [respiratory rate >25 bpm or increase of >50% with respect to the baseline respiratory rate, oxygen partial pressure <65 mmHg, carbon dioxide partial pressure >45 mmHg or pH <7.33) [19] and who were candidates for non-invasive ventilation were included in the study. Extubation failure was classified as follows: 1) Acute respiratory failure secondary to airway problems: obstruction of the upper airway and aspiration or excess of secretions; 2) Acute respiratory failure not dependent of the airway: acute pulmonary oedema, congestive heart failure, hypoxemic and/or hypercapnic acute respiratory failure, encephalopathy and others (digestive bleeding, shock, etc.). Patients who required immediate reintubation after extubation failure were not included.

After confirming extubation failure and the possibility of eligibility to participate in the study, the patient was assigned to a group (non-invasive ventilation group or oxygen group) through the opening of a sealed envelope. Previously, a simple randomisation by a computerised system had been performed by a physician not involved in the study.

Non-invasive ventilation. BiPAP Vision and continuous positive airway pressure devices were used. For the BiPAP Vision, oronasal and facial masks and an active humidification system were used. Procedure: Once the patient was informed of the procedure, the type of mask was selected according to the clinical situation and anatomy of the patient, and the harness was placed. Ventilation was initiated with progressive levels of inspiratory positive airway pressure and expiratory positive airway pressure until a minimum inspiratory positive airway pressure of 10-15 cmH2O and an expiratory positive airway pressure of 5-6 cmH2O were achieved in the first hour. The rise time was 0.1-0.2 seconds. Continuous positive airway pressure. A continuous positive airway pressure device was used through the oronasal mask on the patient. The minimum initial positive end-expiratory pressure level was 5 cmH2O, with progressive increases up to 10-15 cmH2O. The objective pressures of both devices were set to reduce dyspnoea and respiratory mechanics, with an respiratory rate between 25 and 28 bpm. The fraction of inspired oxygen was increased in both devices until a transcutaneous oxygen saturation of 94-96% was achieved. Once the patient's cooperation and sufficient adaptability were achieved, the mask was adjusted to the harness with adjustable straps.

Oxygen therapy. The control group received oxygen therapy using a Venturi mask with an fraction of inspired oxygen up to 0.5 or using a reservoir mask connected to a high-flow flowmeter with 30 L/min of O2 (estimated fraction of inspired oxygen of 1.0).

Both non-invasive ventilation/continuous positive airway pressure and oxygen therapy were maintained continuously (except for hygiene or oral intake) until the patient exhibited improvement from the clinical and/or gasometric perspective. Withdrawal of non-invasive ventilation/continuous positive airway pressure was performed progressively with reduction of inspiratory airway pressure/expiratory positive airway pressure or positive end-expiratory pressure levels until complete disconnection of non-invasive ventilation. In both groups (study and control), after improvement, the fraction of inspired oxygen of the Venturi mask was set to 0.3-0.4. The criteria for failure of both non-invasive ventilation and oxygen therapy were: absence of clinical improvement (respiratory rate>35 bpm, use of accessory muscles, thoracoabdominal asynchrony, encephalopathy) or deterioration of oxygenation (decrease in oxygen partial pressure or in oxygen partial pressure to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio), haemodynamic (noradrenaline >0.5 mcgr/kg/min) or ventilation (increase in carbon dioxide partial pressure and decrease in pH) parameters. Modifications of fraction of inspired oxygen and inspiratory positive airway pressure/expiratory positive airway pressure or positive end-expiratory pressure levels, as well as the time of orotracheal intubation were performed according to the criteria of the physician. All patients received aspiration of secretions, postural changes, incentive spirometry and bronchodilators.

Parameters analysed. After inclusion in the study, demographic data, the reason of mechanical ventilation, severity according to the Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3, organ failure according to the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scale (both of them at intensive care unit admission) and comorbidities were recorded. The duration both of mechanical ventilation until the first extubation and time of spontaneous breathing trial were measured. Neurological variables (Glasgow Coma Score), haemodynamic variables [systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean blood pressure, heart rate], respiratory variables (respiratory rate, transcutaneous oxygen saturation) and blood gases (oxygen partial pressure, fraction of inspired oxygen, oxygen partial pressure to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio, carbon dioxide partial pressure, pH, bicarbonate and lactic acid) were recorded during the T-test of patients eligible to participate in the study and later, when they presented acute respiratory failure due to extubation failure. Similarly, ventilatory parameters were recorded during the 1st,2nd, and 8th hours of randomisation. Time from extubation to acute respiratory failure extubation failure was recorded. After extubation failure, the following variables were recorded: reintubation, tracheostomy, organ failure (cardiovascular, coagulation, renal, liver, neurological) using the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scale and infectious complications (pneumonia or tracheobronchitis associated to mechanical ventilation, urinary tract infection, bacteraemia) were determined. Also the duration both of non-invasive ventilation. and oxygen therapy and globally of mechanical ventilation, were calculated. The mortality rates in the intensive care unit, in the hospital, and at 90 days were determined.

Sample size. Based on previous results, it was considered that the need for intubation could be reduced by 35%. The estimated sample size was 30 patients in each group [NIV group vs oxygen therapy] with a confidence interval [1-α] of 95% and power [1-β] of 80%. Comparative analyses were conducted using Student's t test or the Mann-Whitney test for the comparisons of quantitative variables for parametric and non-parametric characteristics, respectively. For qualitative variables, chi-square statistic or Fisher's exact test were used. Differences were considered significant if P <0.05. A per protocol analysis was performed. Multivariate analysis for repeated measures (with Bonferroni's correction) was performed with the aim of studying the influence either of NIV or oxygen therapy on respiratory parameters. The cumulative probability of survival was assessed using a Kaplan-Meier estimation of survival and a log-rank test to compare the two groups. The data were analysed using the statistical package SPSS 20.0.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

77

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Castello
      • Castellón De La Plana, Castello, Spain, 12004
        • Hospital General Universitari Castello

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Medical and surgical ICU patients with 18 years of age or older
  • First episode of mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Structural neurological disorder
  • Acute toxic-metabolic neurological encephalopathy with neurological deficit [estimated by a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) <14 points] at the time of weaning
  • Neuromuscular disease
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) receiving NIV
  • Limitation of life support therapy during their admission
  • Tracheostomized patients
  • Spinal cord injuries
  • Scheduled surgical procedure during the 48 hours following extubation
  • Intensive care unit readmission
  • Transfer to another centre
  • Contraindication to non-invasive mechanical ventilation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Non-invasive mechanical ventilation

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) was initiated with progressive levels of inspiratory positive airway pressure and expiratory positive airway pressure until a minimum inspiratory positive airway pressure of 10-15 cmH2O and an expiratory positive airway pressure of 5-6 cmH2O were achieved in the first hour. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was initiated with a initial positive end-expiratory pressure level was 5 cmH2O, with progressive increases up to 10-15 cmH2O.

The objective pressures were set to reduce dyspnoea and respiratory mechanics, with an respiratory rate between 25 and 28 bpm. NIV/CPAP were maintained continuously (except for hygiene or oral intake) until the patient exhibited improvement from the clinical and/or gasometric perspective.

ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Venturi mask

For oxygen therapy were used both a Venturi mask with an fraction of inspired oxygen up to 0.5 (15 L/min) and a reservoir mask connected to a high-flow flowmeter with 30 L/min of O2.

The objective oxygen therapy was to reduce dyspnoea and respiratory mechanics, with an respiratory rate between 25 and 28 bpm. Oxygen therapy was maintained continuously (except for hygiene or oral intake) until the patient exhibited improvement from the clinical and/or gasometric perspective.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Intubation
Time Frame: from randomization to 1 week
Need for intubation after assignment to non-invasive mechanical ventilation or oxygen therapy
from randomization to 1 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Tracheotomy
Time Frame: from randomization to 3 weeks
Need for tracheotomy after reintubation, because of prolongation of mechanical ventilation
from randomization to 3 weeks
Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay
Time Frame: From intensive care unit admission to 2 months
Duration of stay at intensive care unit
From intensive care unit admission to 2 months
Hospital Length of Stay
Time Frame: From hospital admission to 3 months
Duration of stay at hospital
From hospital admission to 3 months
Duration of Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation or Oxygen Therapy
Time Frame: From randomization to one week
Duration of non-invasive mechanical ventilation or oxygen therapy after randomization until success or failure.
From randomization to one week
Duration of Global Mechanical Ventilation
Time Frame: From start of mechanical ventilation to one month
Duration of mechanical ventilation until unsupported ventilation
From start of mechanical ventilation to one month
Rate of Intensive Care Unit Mortality
Time Frame: From intensive care unit admission to 2 months
Mortality during intensive care unit stay
From intensive care unit admission to 2 months
Rate of Hospital Mortality
Time Frame: From hospital admission to 3 months
Mortality during hospital stay
From hospital admission to 3 months
Rate of 90 Days Mortality
Time Frame: 90 days after randomization
Mortality at 90 days after randomization
90 days after randomization
Rate of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia
Time Frame: From start of mechanical ventilation to 2 months
Percentage of participants with lung infection during intensive care unit stay
From start of mechanical ventilation to 2 months
Rate of Urinary Tract Infection
Time Frame: From intensive care unit admission to 2 months
Percentage of participants with urinary tract infection during intensive care unit stay
From intensive care unit admission to 2 months
Rate of Bacteremia
Time Frame: From intensive care unit admission to 2 months
Percentage of participants with blood infection during intensive care unit stay
From intensive care unit admission to 2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: ALBERTO BELENGUER MUNCHARAZ, HOSPITAL GENERAL UNIVERSITARIO CASTELLON

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

March 29, 2009

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 4, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 4, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 24, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 6, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 4, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Failure

Clinical Trials on Continuous positive airway pressure

3
Subscribe