Effect of Carbohydrate Distribution on Blood Glucose in Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)

September 27, 2019 updated by: University of Aarhus

The Effect of High-morning-carbohydrate Intake Versus Low-morning-carbohydrate Intake on Glycemic Variability Measured by Continuous Glucose Monitoring in GDM Patients - a Randomized Crossover Study

This study aims to investigate whether high-morning carbohydrate intake (HMK) compared with low-morning carbohydrate intake (LMK) affects glycemic variability in GDM patients based on Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM).

High carbohydrate morning intake is expected to reduce hyperglycemic episodes and stabilize blood glucose compared with low morning carbohydrate intake.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Detailed Description

Background:

Women with GDM have an increased risk of macrosomia, cesarean section, birth defects and long term complications such as an increased risk, in both mother and child, to develop type 2 diabetes.

According to Invitro and invivo studies of type 1 and 2 diabetes, great variations in blood glucose levels caused more complications than constantly elevated glucose levels. This study, therefore, intends to use Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for day-to-day monitoring of glycemic variability, including frequency, duration, and magnitude of hyperglycaemic fluctuations.

Carbohydrate is the macronutrient that has the greatest impact on postprandial blood glucose response. Despite this, there is a current lack of evidence of how the carbohydrate intake should be distributed throughout a day.

This study aims to investigate whether high-morning carbohydrate intake (HMK) compared to low-morning carbohydrate intake (LMK) affects glycemic variability in GDM patients.

Design:

Randomized crossover intervention study comparing two intervention diets; high-morning carbohydrate intake (HMK) versus low-morning carbohydrate intake (LMK) each of 3 days duration with four-day washout.

Diet intervention: Both intervention diets have the same calorie content and contain the same amounts of protein, carbohydrate and fat for the individual patient, but the distribution of carbohydrate and energy differs throughout the day.

Dietary intake will be estimated through 24-hour recall interview by trained dietitians. Estimation of actual intake is validated by photos of every main meal.

All data will be collected and stored in RedCap to secure data checks.

Statistics Analysis and sample size:

Power calculation on primary outcome MAGE- estimates 15 patients for inclusion with a power of 80%, SD 0,6mmol/l, a significance level of 0,05 and a MIREDIF of 0,5 mmol/l. 15 persons include an expected dropout rate at 20%.

Non-parametric tests will be used for the secondary and primary outcome.

Perspective:

A future perspective of this study is to improve the current treatment in regards to nutritional recommendations. Thus, the study could potentially contribute with the knowledge that would clarify the carbohydrate recommendations and improve the glycemic control of patients with GDM and therefore be beneficial to patients' future treatment and prevent complications and development of type 2 diabetes in the child.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Aarhus N
      • Skejby, Aarhus N, Denmark, 8200
        • University Hospital Aarhus
      • Skejby, Aarhus N, Denmark, 8200
        • University of Aarhus

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosed according to current WHO criteria for a 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) > 8.5 mmol/l
  • Non-insulin depending
  • Adult 18+ years
  • Gestational age weeks 30-36 at start of inclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with celiac disease
  • Received bariatric surgery
  • Diagnosed eating disorder
  • Insulin-dependent diabetes at trial start
  • Known with type 2 diabetes before pregnancy
  • Children under 18 years
  • Starting up in insulin during the intervention period
  • Diagnosed with lactose intolerance
  • Goes into labor before the intervention is completed

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Low-morning-carbohydrate

Low morning intake and high evening intake of carbohydrates. This means a distribution of carbohydrate as follows:

10% morning, 40% lunch, 50% dinner. The overall recommendations for macro- and micronutrient intake for GDM patients will be met.

A total of 2x3 days, were the patient follow a detailed diet plan. For 3 days they follow a diet plan where the majority of the carbohydrates are located on either the first part of the day(HMK) or the last part of the day(LMK). 4 days of washout are placed between the two interventions. They will not receive food but will be guided by a trained dietitian and the use of a meal plan.
Other Names:
  • High-energy breakfasting compared with high-energy dinner
Experimental: High-morning-carbohydrate

High morning intake and low evening intake of carbohydrates.

This means a distribution of carbohydrate as follows:

50% morning, 40% lunch, 10% dinner. The overall recommendations for macro- and micronutrient intake for GDM patients will be met.

A total of 2x3 days, were the patient follow a detailed diet plan. For 3 days they follow a diet plan where the majority of the carbohydrates are located on either the first part of the day(HMK) or the last part of the day(LMK). 4 days of washout are placed between the two interventions. They will not receive food but will be guided by a trained dietitian and the use of a meal plan.
Other Names:
  • High-energy breakfasting compared with high-energy dinner

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
mean amplitude of glucose excursions (MAGE)
Time Frame: 6 days
An index for glycemic variability assessment MAGE is the average variation in amplitude and is calculated as the mean of absolute value differences between adjacent glucose peaks and valleys, where the differences exceed 1 Standard Deviation (SD) from the mean.
6 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Coefficient of variation
Time Frame: 6 days
Coefficient of variation
6 days
MBG
Time Frame: 6 days
The average blood glucose, calculated for each two intervention periods using CGM data.
6 days
Glucagon-like-peptide 1 (GLP1)
Time Frame: 1 hour *2
glucagon-like-peptide 1, difference in 1 hour postprandial response
1 hour *2
Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP)
Time Frame: 1 hour*2
Gastric inhibitory polypeptide difference in 1 hour postprandial response
1 hour*2
C-peptide
Time Frame: 11 days
Changes in C-peptide according to carbohydrate distribution
11 days

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
3-hydroxy-butyrate
Time Frame: 11 days
To assess ketonemia
11 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Per G Ovesen, Dr.Med, Women's diseases and births

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 25, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 27, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 8, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 30, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes, Gestational

Clinical Trials on High/low carbohydrate distribution

3
Subscribe