- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03853811
Customized Orthosis for Children With Clubfoot
April 2, 2022 updated by: Scott Van Valin, Medical College of Wisconsin
Customized Orthosis for Children With Clubfoot Following Ponseti Casting
This study will examine the use of a novel customized Ankle Foot Orthosis (AFO), created using 3D scanning, with children being treated for clubfoot.
The AFO is inserted in the standard Mitchell shoe during bracing, following Ponseti casting.
The investigators hypothesize that following Ponseti casting, the implementation of customized AFOs with Ponseti bracing will improve patient compliance and functional outcomes as well as lead to fewer relapses in comparison to the standard bracing with Mitchell shoes.
Study Overview
Status
Terminated
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
3
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53226
- Children's Hospital of Wisconsin
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
No older than 4 months (Child)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- less than 12 months old (no age minimum)
- no neuromuscular disease involved
- treated by Ponseti casting
- idiopathic bilateral or unilateral clubfoot
- no other congenital foot deformity
- no previous open surgeries to treat the deformity
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients with prior surgical treatment
- not treated by Ponseti casting
- an underlying syndrome
- neurological disorder
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Mitchell Shoe + AFO
Group will receive standard Mitchell shoes along with the custom orthotic insert.
|
The intervention group will receive the custom AFO to use in their standard Mitchell shoe.
|
No Intervention: Standard Mitchell Shoe (Control - Standard Treatment)
Group will receive standard treatment which includes bracing with standard Mitchell shoes (no custom orthotic).
Patients would receive this treatment regardless of study participation.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Assessment of Functional Outcomes of Bracing Treatment Using Dimeglio Scores
Time Frame: Collected when visit where cast is applied, visit when cast is removed, then at 2 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks of bracing
|
Assessed using changes in Dimeglio Scores.
The Dimeglio scoring system uses a 20-point system (20 being the most severe and <5 as benign) by assessing four parameters.
The severity of the deformity is then assigned a grade of I-IV with IV being the most severe.
(A score of <5 is given a grade of I, =5<10 is grade II, =10<15 is grade III, and =15<20 is grade IV)
|
Collected when visit where cast is applied, visit when cast is removed, then at 2 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks of bracing
|
Time Spent in Brace to Assess Brace Compliance
Time Frame: 24 weeks (from start of bracing treatment)
|
Measured with sensor placed in Mitchell shoe
|
24 weeks (from start of bracing treatment)
|
Assessing Treatment Factors that Impact Brace Compliance with Parental Questionnaires
Time Frame: 24 weeks (from start of bracing treatment)
|
Assessing reasons for poor compliance with parental questionnaires.
The questionnaires ask questions about casting, occurrences of skin lesions, history of treatments, bracing information, reasons for not using brace, and brace slippage
|
24 weeks (from start of bracing treatment)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Assessing Demographic Factors that Impact Brace Compliance with Parental Questionnaire
Time Frame: 24 weeks (from start of bracing treatment)
|
The initial questionnaire asks questions about parental demographics to determine what factors may influence brace treatment compliance
|
24 weeks (from start of bracing treatment)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Scott Van Valin, MD, Medical College of Wisconsin
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
April 17, 2019
Primary Completion (Actual)
March 2, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
March 2, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 20, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 21, 2019
First Posted (Actual)
February 26, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 11, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 2, 2022
Last Verified
April 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1246407
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Congenital Talipes Equinovarus
-
Assiut UniversityEnrolling by invitationRecurrent Congenital Talipes EquinovarusEgypt
-
The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing...RecruitingPrenatal Diagnosis and Closed-loop Management System of Congenital Talipes EquinovarusChina
-
Albert Einstein Healthcare NetworkCompleted
-
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenWithdrawn
-
University of British ColumbiaCompletedIdiopathic Clubfoot (Talipes Equinovarus)Canada
-
Pakistan Society for Rehabilitation of Differently...RecruitingCongenital Talipes EquinovarusPakistan
-
University of British ColumbiaCompletedIdiopathic Clubfoot (Talipes Equinovarus)Canada
-
Alberta Children's HospitalCompletedClubfoot | Ponseti Method | Talipes Equinovarus | CastingCanada
-
University Hospital, LimogesAllerganCompleted
-
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De MarseilleCompletedSpastic Equinovarus FootFrance
Clinical Trials on Ankle Foot Orthosis (AFO)
-
Lieven De MaesschalckHandicap InternationalCompleted
-
Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic and District...University of Nottingham; Keele UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Oslo University HospitalSophies Minde; NITO, Norwegian engineering and technology organiziationUnknownHemiplegic Cerebral Palsy | Cerebral Palsy, SpasticNorway
-
Innovative NeurotronicsCompleted
-
ThuasneUniversity Hospital of Saint-EtienneCompletedGait, Hemiplegic | Hemiparesis;Poststroke/CVAFrance
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruiting
-
Tan Tock Seng HospitalCompletedStroke | Spinal Cord Injuries | Nerve PalsySingapore
-
TOPMEDNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, Canada; Turbomed Orthotics...Completed
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterCompletedMultiple SclerosisUnited States