Comparing Ropivacaine Adductor Canal Blockade by Surgeon Versus Anesthesiologist

March 4, 2019 updated by: Rothman Institute Orthopaedics

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Intraoperative Surgeon-Performed Versus Anesthesiologist-Performed Adductor Canal Blockade After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of two methods of administering an adductor canal block (ACB) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA); intraoperative surgeon performed intra-articular adductor canal block (IACB) and anesthesiologist ultrasound guided ADC in the post-anesthesia recovery unit (PACU).

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

164

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Rothman Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing unilateral primary TKA with underlying diagnosis of osteoarthritis
  • ASA I - III
  • Spinal anesthesia
  • All patients will have cemented total knee utilizing a medial parapatellar approach with posterior stabilized or cruciate retaining implants. A tourniquet will be used in all cases.
  • Patients must be between 18 and 80 years of age.
  • Active and valid email address for the participant.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to anesthetics or study analgesic medications.
  • Contraindication to regional anesthesia
  • Non-english speaking
  • ASA IV or greater
  • Renal insufficiency with Cr > 2.0 or hepatic failure
  • General or epidural anesthesia
  • Sensory/motor disorder involving the operative limb
  • Patients who consume preoperative opioids for pain control.
  • Pregnant women
  • Mentally disabled patients and patients with psychiatric disorders that would prevent them from properly understanding and evaluating an informed consent process.
  • Prisoners

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Control
Anesthesiologist preforms ultrasound guided adductor canal block post-operatively
Drug: Ropivacaine
For primary TKA, Ropivacaine is used in both arms, either performed intra-operatively by surgeon or post-operatively (ultrasound guided) by anesthesiologist.
Experimental: Intervention
Surgeon preforms inter-operative adductor canal block
Drug: Ropivacaine
For primary TKA, Ropivacaine is used in both arms, either performed intra-operatively by surgeon or post-operatively (ultrasound guided) by anesthesiologist.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in visual analog scale pain score
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks post-surgery
The primary end point is the patients' reported visual analogue pain score (VAS). 0-100mm scale
Up to 6 weeks post-surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in range of motion
Time Frame: up to 6 weeks post-surgery
Range of motion
up to 6 weeks post-surgery
Change in timed up and go
Time Frame: up to 6 weeks post-surgery
Timed up and go
up to 6 weeks post-surgery
Change in daily opioid consumption
Time Frame: up to 6 weeks post-surgery
daily opioid consumption
up to 6 weeks post-surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Rothman Institute Orthopaedics

Collaborators

Sharpe-Strumia Research Foundation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 26, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 6, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 6, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2018LonnerSS

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Postoperative

Clinical Trials on Ropivacaine

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Saint Lucia

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe