Study Evaluating the Impact of Short Message Service on Compliance With Surveillance of Patients With Germ-cell Tumors (TEXTIS)

Phase II, Open-label, Randomized, Non-comparative Study Evaluating the Impact of Short Message Service (SMS) on Compliance With Surveillance of Patients With Germ-cell Tumors. (TEXTIS Study)

This study will evaluate the impact of Short Message Service (SMS) on compliance with surveillance of patients with germ-cell tumors. Patients will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to get 2 groups : (1) patients will receive reminder SMS before appointment detailing the date of consultation and exams to be performed before; (2) standard of care without SMS.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

235

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Franche-Comté
      • Besançon, Franche-Comté, France, 25030

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

235 patients, with 157 in the experimental arm, with SMS sending and 78 patients in the control arm, without sending SMS.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with germ cell tumor.
  • Patient with a mobile phone.
  • Patient on surveillance.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Testicular cancer without germ cell component.
  • Prior history of other malignancy except for: cutaneous cancers excluding melanoma, superficial bladder tumor, localized prostate cancer with undetectable PSA.
  • Cognitive condition that would preclude patient's understanding and completion of study procedures.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: reminder SMS before appointment
SMS before appointment detailing the date of consultation and exams to be performed before
short message service
Active comparator: standard of care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of patients who report optimal compliance to surveillance
Time Frame: 1 year

Optimal compliance is defined according to the following 2 parameters:

  • The patient comes to all the appointments, on the expected day, AND
  • With all the biological and imaging exams previously scheduled by the physician.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of patients who report intermediate compliance to surveillance
Time Frame: 1 year

Intermediate compliance is defined according to the following 2 parameters:

  • The patient comes to all the appointments, but in one of the consultations, he delays his scheduled appointment of more than 3 weeks but less than 6 weeks OR
  • Missing a biological or imaging exam.
1 year
Rate of patients who report a non compliance to surveillance
Time Frame: 1 year

Non compliance is defined according to the following 3 parameters:

The patient misses a consultation, without warning, OR

  • He delays of more than 6 weeks his appointment of consultation, OR
  • At least 2 biological or imaging exams requested by the oncologist are missing from all consultations.
1 year
Patient satisfaction of sending SMS, in experimental arm
Time Frame: 1 year
It is evaluated with the following question: do you find that having reminder sms for your appointments and exams is useful? evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10 (0: useless, 10: useful)
1 year
biological recurrence rate
Time Frame: 1 year
Biological recurrence rate is defined by the increase in tumor markers (alpha-fetoprotein, lactic dehydrogenase, human chorionic gonadotropin).
1 year
Radiological recurrence rate
Time Frame: 1 year
Radiological recurrence rate is defined according to Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) criteria 1.1.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 28, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 1, 2021

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 4, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 8, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 8, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Compliance, Patient

Clinical Trials on short message service

3
Subscribe