Early Metabolic Resuscitation for Septic Shock

March 11, 2021 updated by: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Early Metabolic Resuscitation: A Potential Solution to Multi-Organ Dysfunction Syndrome in Septic Shock

This phase II trial studies how well early metabolic resuscitation therapy works in reducing multi-organ dysfunction in patients with septic shock. Early metabolic resuscitation is made of large doses of glucose, protein, and essential metabolic molecules that may help lower the effects of septic shock on the body. Giving patients early metabolic resuscitation in combination with standard of care may work better in reducing multi-organ dysfunction syndrome in patients with septic shock compared to standard of care alone.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To assess the efficacy of administering early metabolic resuscitation with standard of care (SC + EMR) in patients diagnosed with septic shock for reducing 28-day mortality versus using the standard of care alone (SC).

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To assess whether early metabolic resuscitation with standard of care (SC + EMR) is an effective strategy to reduce intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, hospital mortality, and 90-day mortality of septic shock patients relative to SC.

II. To compare the time to death from any cause between patients administered SC + EMR versus SC after being diagnosed with septic shock.

III. To assess whether SC + EMR is an effective strategy to reduce complications of septic shock such as: i) acute kidney injury, ii) dialysis requirements, iii) need for cardiovascular support or days on vasopressors, iv) need for invasive ventilation, days on ventilator support, v) duration of ICU stay, and vi) duration of hospital stay versus SC.

IV. To describe the presence of any adverse effects between the two study groups (SC + EMR group versus [vs] SC group); thus, characterizing their safety.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 groups.

GROUP I: Patients receive standard of care for septic shock.

GROUP II: Patients receive standard of care treatment for septic shock and early metabolic resuscitation (IV) over continuous infusion for up to 7 days.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • M D Anderson Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Admitted to the adult medical intensive care unit (MICU).
  • Diagnosis of septic shock within 12 hours of ICU admission defined as meeting criteria for sepsis in addition to the following: A) Vasopressor therapy needed to elevate mean arterial pressure (MAP) >= 65 mmg Hg. B) Lactate > 2 mmol/L (18 mg/dL) after adequate fluid resuscitation.
  • Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score meeting the following requirements A) Cardiovascular SOFA >= 2 B) Total SOFA score =< 12.
  • Patients meeting the above and not able to tolerate enteral nutrition above 70% of their estimated daily caloric need.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Do not resuscitate (DNR).
  • Comfort care and end-of-life patients.
  • Patients with SOFA scores greater than 12.
  • Pregnant women.
  • Jehovah Witnesses that do not accept albumin.
  • Active bleeding (e.g., gastrointestinal bleeding).
  • Acute neurological syndromes (e.g., stroke, hemorrhage, etc.).
  • End-stage renal disease (ESRD).
  • Chronic liver disease

    • Child-Pugh class C
    • Diagnosis of cirrhosis
  • Heart rate less than 50 beats per minute (bpm).
  • Respiratory rate less than 8 respirations per minute (rpm).
  • Temperature less than 95 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or 35 degrees Celsius (C).
  • Tumor lysis syndrome.
  • Sulfite allergy: amino acids administration are contraindicated. It is more common in steroid dependent asthmatics. (Please note that this is NOT sulfa allergy and is NOT contraindicated patients with sulfa allergy). Sulfites are present in dried fruits, beer, wines, sausages, jams, maple syrup, and many other food products.
  • Serum sodium concentration < 130 mEq/L or > 150 mEq/L (Note: Once serum sodium levels are >= 130 or =< 150 mEq/L within 12 hours after meeting inclusion criteria, the patient can then be considered for the study. This is only a temporary restriction.
  • Serum creatinine level: Serum creatinine (SCr) > 2.5 mg/dL (Note: Once serum creatinine levels are =< 2.5 mg/dL within 12 hours after meeting inclusion criteria, the patient can then be considered for the study. This is only a temporary restriction).
  • Urine output < 400 cc/24 hours (hrs) plus creatinine > 2.5 mq/dl (Note: Once urine output levels are >= 400 cc within 12 hours after meeting inclusion criteria, the patient can then be considered for the study. This is only a temporary restriction).
  • Hyperkalemia K > 5.5 mEq/L (Note: Once potassium levels are =< 5.5 mEq/L within 12 hours after meeting inclusion criteria, the patient can then be considered for the study. This is only a temporary restriction).
  • Hyperglycemia: Glucose > 250 mg/dL (Note: Once glucose is below 250 mg/dL within 12 hours after meeting inclusion criteria, the patient can then be considered for the study. This is only a temporary restriction.)
  • Hyperphosphatemia: Serum phosphorous > 5.5 mg/dL.
  • Patient with a history of metabolic abnormality in any one of the following amino acids: alanine, arginine, cysteine hydrochloride, glycine, histidine, isoleucine, leucine, lysine acetate, methionine, phenylalanine, phosphoric acid, proline, serine, threonine, tryptophan, and valine.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group I (standard of care)
Patients receive standard of care for septic shock.
Receive standard of care
Other Names:
  • standard of care
  • standard therapy
Experimental: Group II (early metabolic resuscitation)
Patients receive standard of care treatment for septic shock and early metabolic resuscitation (IV) over continuous infusion for up to 7 days.
Receive standard of care
Other Names:
  • standard of care
  • standard therapy
Given Intravenous
Other Names:
  • EMR
  • glucose
  • hyperalimentation
  • protein
  • essential metabolic molecules

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With 28-day Mortality
Time Frame: up to 28 days or until death, whichever comes first
To assess the efficacy of administering Early Metabolic Resuscitation with Standard of Care (SC + EMR) in patients diagnosed with septic shock for reducing 28-day mortality versus using the Standard of Care alone (SC). Twenty-eight day mortality is defined during the time from the day SC+EMR or SC was first administered until a patient dies or is followed through 28 days (whichever comes first).
up to 28 days or until death, whichever comes first

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With 90-Day Mortality
Time Frame: up to 90 days or until death, whichever comes first
To assess whether Early Metabolic Resuscitation with standard of care (SC + EMR) is an effective strategy to reduce ICU mortality, hospital mortality, and 90-day mortality of septic shock patients relative to SC. ICU mortality is defined as mortality at ICU discharge relative to SC.
up to 90 days or until death, whichever comes first
Number of Participants With Hospital Mortality
Time Frame: up to 90 days or until death, whichever comes first
To assess whether Early Metabolic Resuscitation with standard of care (SC + EMR) is an effective strategy to reduce hospital mortality of septic shock patients relative to SC.
up to 90 days or until death, whichever comes first
Number of Participants With ICU Mortality
Time Frame: up to 90-days or until death, whichever comes first
To assess whether Early Metabolic Resuscitation with standard of care (SC + EMR) is an effective strategy to reduce ICU mortality of septic shock patients relative to SC. ICU mortality is defined as mortality at ICU discharge relative to SC.
up to 90-days or until death, whichever comes first

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joseph L. Nates, MBA,MD, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 4, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 4, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

May 4, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 28, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2018-0986 (Other Identifier: M D Anderson Cancer Center)
  • P30CA016672 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • NCI-2019-01392 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Septic Shock

Clinical Trials on Best Practice

3
Subscribe